Date: 20.1.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 657
Assignmentgeek.dehaorhan.com #Harvard university application essay prompt

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Harvard university application essay prompt

Harvard university application essay prompt

Mar/Sat/2018 | Uncategorized





Guide to the 2017-2018 Harvard University Supplemental Essay

Harvard university application essay prompt

Custom Academic Paper Writing Services -
Top 6 Harvard Admissions Essays - Study Notes

balkan ghosts essay I picked up Balkan Ghosts because I was interested in university prompt, the subject matter, and I hadn#8217;t read anything by Robert D. Kaplan before this. It#8217;s interesting that this book was published in the #8220;Vintage Departures#8221; series because it might not have occurred to me that this book is a travelogue, even though Kaplan does spend much of the book on rickety trains and in decrepit hotels throughout the Balkans. Essays About Business Plans! So unmethodical are his travels that #8220;travelogue#8221; seems a misnomer. Nonetheless, Kaplan#8217;s descriptions of the Balkans just months after the harvard university application essay prompt, fall of Communism are illuminating. At every turn, he is essay prompts for high seniors digging up hidden details unseen by Western eyes during the decades of communism. Through the shattered republics of Yugoslavia he travels, then on university, to Romania, Bulgaria and Greece. Kaplan imbues the book with an offshore essay impressive amount of historical context, going to great lengths to university essay prompt avoid the generalizations that are more typically employed to explain the seemingly perpetual strife of the Balkans. The book was published in 1995, the mid-point of a bloody decade in the Balkans, and it contains a good deal of forewarning of what was to come to pass in the region in coursework wire, the coming years. In this sense the book is impressive in a third way. Harvard Application Prompt! Beyond a travelogue, beyond a regional history, Balkan Ghosts is the rare #8220;current events#8221; book that will not soon become obsolete. One Response to #8220;Review: Balkan Ghosts by Robert D. Kaplan#8221; at 6:14 am on July 5, 2013.

Robert Kaplan#8217;s Balkan Ghosts is an enjoyable, insightful and educational travelogue with curious shortcomings and puzzling omissions. I second the opinion of other critics who point out that snapshot experiences and anecdotal knowledge are insufficient for the sort of sweeping generalizations made by Kaplan. The rumor that US Balkan policy was influenced by these peripheral observations speaks volumes about the lack of well informed and knowledgeable local experts in gcse coursework, State Department circles. Harvard Application Essay Prompt! Having myself lived in provincial Northern Greece for over two years, I heartily concur that Greece is more Balkan than Western European, local Hellenistic posturing none withstanding. It was a revelation to sox fatherhood me, though, that Saloniki was at one time a Jewish stronghold.

No hint of harvard university this significant history is available, as the writer correctly points out. Sox Fatherhood Essay! His depreciative commentary about Apostle Paul’s Christian mission in the area, however, reveals a distinct and harvard university lamentable bias on the part of the writer, also exposed in other works of his ( ref.). Despite Kaplan#8217;s many citations and a sort of bibliography, it seems his most frequent references are previous travel generalizers who agree with him. Justice! Nevertheless, I must concur, based on my own limited local observations, that the Greek / Turkish / Albanian / Egyptian / Macedonian relationships are laid down in essence correctly. Harvard University Essay Prompt! Many Greeks consider the Turks as #8220;Untermenschen#8221;, despite that fact that their race, food, music, style of gcse physics resistance wire life, etc. are virtually indistinguishable from their own. I had the pleasure to become friends with a hulking Greek stevedore, scion of a respected family in Kavalla, who was honored to be selected as Macedonian guard in Athens during military service. It was he who enlightened me as to the significance of the 400 folds in harvard university application, the white skirt of their traditional uniform.

This is the sort of insightful factoid Kaplan omits. Surely, the remembrance of oil drilling 400 years of Ottoman rule in such overt fashion says much about the Greek xenophobic attitude toward her neighbors. Essay! Kaplan mentions travel across the resistance wire, Northern border and comments on the similarity on both sides, as well as the intentional blindness of the Greeks for the extant Muslim villages on harvard university application essay, their side. Wire! I, too, crossed the WWI era two lane bridge separating the enemy border, but even my untrained eye recognized the dug-out tank and artillery positions on both sides of the harvard university application essay prompt, frontier. The bridge is brightly painted blue and white on usc emba essays, one side and red and white on the other. Exactly in the middle stand two soldiers in battle gear, shoulder to university application essay prompt shoulder, staring stoically straight ahead. Not since crossing the old West/East German border had I experienced such fanatical posturing. Kaplan says that Greeks are unable to articulate the name of Istanbul, but what Kaplan fails to mention is that nowhere inside Greece, as far back as Saloniki, do road signs show a correct indication on the highway leading to that metropolis straddling the physics, Bosporus. Harvard University! The blue and white signs invariably read #8220;Konstantinopolis#8221;, a mythical destination, kept very much alive by delusion of Hellenistic manifest destiny. Robert Kaplan extemporizes on the Albanians and Egyptians viz-a-viz Greece, but tells us little of gcse coursework resistance substance. Albanians are the wetbacks of Greece, in status just barely above the Turks and Gypsies.

They work in agriculture and other menial occupations and the Greeks deride them in terms rivaling the worst American immigration critics. Similarly, Kavalla is the birthplace of one of the last Ottoman rulers and the Greek Egyptian connection continues. Seasonally, thousands of essay Egyptian laborers shuttle to white sox fatherhood essay the Greek countryside for the olive, tobacco and grape harvests. I do not know if these are Muslim or Coptic Egyptians, though it would have been useful to application prompt have Kaplan figure it out. The Macedonian hyperbole broke while I was resident in the little seaport East of prompts school seniors Saloniki. I personally witnessed the unloading of German made Leopard battle tanks and their deployment toward the Northwestern frontier, ostensibly on #8216;maneuvers#8217;.

My friend, the great big ex-honor guard, was the most hospitable, kind and generous Greek one can possibly imagine, yet there was no way to talk any sense into him when it came to harvard essay prompt Turks or the issue of gcse physics resistance wire Macedonia. University Essay! The depth of Greek universal antipathy in regards to the Macedonian issue is, if anything, understated in Balkan Ghosts. Kaplan depreciates the #8216;Zorba the Greek#8217; image Americans have of Greece. That is a fair thing to do, but I must also balance it. Oil Drilling! One of my local employees was a native of a simple goat herder#8217;s village in the mountains bordering Bulgaria. My wife and I were invited to the village fest commemorating its Orthodox saint. I witnessed, and harvard application participated in, a night of usc emba essays dancing, feasting and hospitality exceeding the scenes in the above mentioned story film. There is a genuine Greek hospitality, depth of melancholic soul and application essay prompt sincerity that makes up a true and admirable Greek culture. I suspect this can be said about each and every part of the essays, Balkans brushed over by Kaplan. The values are surely different and unique, but they are not pulled together.

Balkan Ghosts gives us repeated small slivers of such genuine appreciation and deference to native culture, yet these impressions are never generalized into positive summations the way analogous negative sentiments are condensed. Without firsthand knowledge I am unable to comment on the various ecclesiastic observations made by Kaplan throughout the rest of the Balkans. His treatment of religion and harvard university prompt its connection to nationality in Greece, however, is deficient. No mention is made of Athos, the semi-autonomous peninsula, so significant in the preservation of Greek culture during the 400 years. I learned that young Greek men regularly opt to offshore essay experience a sabbatical in one of the university essay prompt, mythical monasteries and then have the legal right to resume their profane professions, presumably much improved spiritually.

To my surprise, the oldest known monastery is located in the center of the prompts seniors, Sinai and it persevered under centuries of Arab, Ottoman, Egyptian and even, briefly, Israeli rule. St. Katherine#8217;s fortress redoubt at the foot of Moses#8217; mountain is university application manned by orthodox Greek monks, a testament to the unique strength and permanence of this protean Christian faith. Oil Drilling! More to the point, however, is the emergence of a widespread trans-national religious experience. I suspect Kaplan did, or could have, seen it elsewhere, but fails to recognize its significance. Upon arrival in Kavalla we inquired as to the existence of a Protestant denomination and were told bluntly by everyone we knew that such a thing did not exist. Exist it did, as it does in harvard university essay, the remotest jungle villages of on the criminal justice Peru and the very last hamlet of the supposedly Catholic Brazilian interior. We found two fundamental Protestant congregations practicing their faith almost underground and in clear juxtaposition to the state recognized Orthodox mantle. Greece postures to have religious freedom and tolerance in keeping with its pretense to European membership.

Our experience shows otherwise. It is forbidden by law to proselytize and the proscription goes deep. The group we worshipped with was made up more of people from the margins of Greek society; extremely poor, some Muslim apostates, a score #8216;Bulgarians#8217; and harvard university essay prompt more than one who had had conflicts with the Orthodox Church. One convert lived in an outlying village and resistance lay on university application, her deathbed. The pastor, cardiac surgeon at the Kavalla hospital, went to see her on a pastoral visit only to find the local orthodox priest in gcse resistance wire, attendance, at the urging of various meddlesome relatives. He was trying to get the poor soul to renounce her convictions and return to the bosom of orthodox mythology. She eventually relented under the harvard essay prompt, pressure, else she would have been denied a #8216;Christian#8217; burial in the village cemetery. The pastor and elders of the church nevertheless attended the interment. At the open graveside, the orthodox priest berated the apostate Protestants for their heresy and sox fatherhood praised the deceased for turning away from the worship of harvard university satan ! The new Protestant presence in essays plans, Greece and around the world is an extremely significant phenomenon, not lost on harvard application essay, the papacy, but not apparent to Kaplan. This is the sort of depth one would wish for from a bestselling commentary about the Balkans.

Here comes my generalization, based on about plans, partial and biased observation: The Balkans, Greece specifically included, have not undergone the spiritual cleansing of the university, reformation, never concluded WWI and offshore essay have certainly not learned one whit from WWII. This is to their peril, because these people are in harvard university essay, danger of living through the dictate which predicts that those who fail to oil drilling learn from history, are condemned to repeat it. Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead. Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion. NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Application Prompt! Don't be a jerk. We reserve the white essay, right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.

Hell Doesn’t Discriminate: On #8216;Spoils#8217; by Brian Van Reet September 27, 2017 Three Authors in Search of Melville September 25, 2017 Karl Ove Knausgaard Shows You What Makes Life Worth Living September 20, 2017 Closer to Truth: On Nicole Krauss#8217;s #8216;Forest Dark#8217; September 18, 2017 Making Myths in the Space Between the Lines September 15, 2017 View All. Women Who Want Out October 3, 2017 Must-Read Poetry: October 2017 October 3, 2017 Spitting in the Face of Empire: The Millions Interviews Nisi Shawl October 2, 2017 October Preview: The Millions Most Anticipated (This Month) October 1, 2017 The Creative Life: How We Do It (Any Way We Can) September 29, 2017 View All. steven augustine says H! Anyone who wants their eyes opened to the nauseating, utterly un-heroic, irrefutably evil reality of the American War Machine (war. Harvard University! Art of white sox fatherhood essay War: The Legacy of Michael Herr C B says Also, I#8217;ve been reading his earliest short story collections and they are AMAZING. October Preview: The Millions Most Anticipated (This Month) C B says Yeah, I thought I#8217;d mention the paperback anyway, even if it isn#8217;t actually new. But I love that he has a new. October Preview: The Millions Most Anticipated (This Month) H.A. says Hi C B, as a T.C.

Boyle fan since Water Music (hilarious) to my favorite #8220;Drop City#8221;, I could not get through The. October Preview: The Millions Most Anticipated (This Month) H.A. says What an unfortunate name for a car! Ha! And indeed Steve you are right about application essay prompt wars, they are all pretty much an usc emba essays invasion of harvard sorts by a grossly. Art of War: The Legacy of Michael Herr.

Mmix The Millions. White Sox Fatherhood Essay! Some rights reserved. This work is application essay prompt licensed under a cc attribution-noncommercial-Sharealike 2.5 License.

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Should You Submit the Harvard Optional Supplement Essay?

Report For Spm English Essays and Research Papers. ? SPM Oral English Test Name: Lai Jin Suan(40) 980223-14-6223 Euguein Low Cheng Wei(37) Zhe Hui() Class: 5S Xin . Date: Model: 4 Topic: Activity: Talking and sharing information Whitney: Hey, Jessica, have a seat. You always seem to harvard university, be looking for a place to hide. It must be tough with your dad on white essay the television almost every night now. Cafeterias sure aren't private, and you do have to university application, eat! Jessica: What a pain hiding from essay people sometimes! Still, dad's been in politics for awhile now. Air pollution , Mississippi River , Oxygen 1211 Words | 3 Pages. English Report ---drug abase Solution: drug abase (family) Parents how to harvard university application essay prompt, help their child to offshore oil drilling, stay away from prompt drug? . Essay On The Justice. Parents played a really important role of helping teenagers to harvard university application, stay away from drug. The reason is parents are really close to their child When their child faced some problems and they don’t know how to solve the problem, parents should do something for them to help them to solve the problem. So that important thing is on the criminal justice build up a strong with their child.

There are four effective. A. R. Harvard University. Gurney , Child , Childhood 695 Words | 3 Pages. ? English Visual Representation “Fear-Less” Away- Michael Gow The Fear- Ben Howard Thomas Noble S.Colley Visual Representation . Report “Discovery and white sox fatherhood essay Discovering can offer new understanding and renew perceptions of university essay prompt ourselves and others” Introduction In the essay on the texts Away- Michael Gow and The Fear- Ben Howard the audience discovers the university essay prompt concept that fear, in essay criminal justice an individual is more a process than a single moment in life, this is the university application prompt core idea communicated to the aspiring. Anxiety , Claustrophobia , Fear 1291 Words | 6 Pages. ?MINUTES OF ENGLISH PANEL MEETING (15 Jan 2013 @ 1.35 pm, Physics Lab) Attendance : 1. Puan Adila bt Ahmad (Head of Panel) 2. Puan . Offshore Oil Drilling. Julaila bt Yahya (Senior Teacher of Language Department) 3. Puan Zuraini bt Abdullah 4. Puan Suhaila bt Kayat 5. Puan Syazrin Syimee bt Sharifuddin 6. Puan Zuhira @ Suria bt Ghazali 7. Puan Asmaton bt Mohd Nawawi 8. Puan Robitah bt Nordin 9. Puan Santhi Nair a/p Baskaran Nair 10. En Mohd Azlan b. Mohd Ali Secretary : En.Azlan bin Mohd Ali Absentees. Education , English people , School 997 Words | 6 Pages. A Report on English Camp Activities. A Report on application essay English Camp Activities Last school holidays, the on the criminal English Language Society in my school had . organised an English Camp for all students. There were many activities organised by the society to attract the students to university, participate and to usc emba essays, practise using English language through out the camp. As the secretary of the English Language Society, I has been asked to harvard university essay, report on the activities during the English Camp.

There were several activities organised by the member of English Language. British Isles , Dialect , E. Nesbit 665 Words | 3 Pages. Report On The English Week Programme In SMK Alam Shah English Week was an opportunity for students to on the justice, show . everyone their appreciation and ability at English . In SMK Alam Shah, the application essay English Week was carried out from 18 April until 22 April 2011. The programme was organized by essay, the English Language Society. With the slogan “I Love English ”, this programme was aimed to encourage all pupils to use English Language as a medium of interaction with their friends and teachers. Various activities were.

British Isles , England , English language 859 Words | 3 Pages. LITERATURE Class: VHVH 01 – Group: 4 Name: Le Kim Ha Anh Student ID: 0957010009 Writing Book Reports : DOING ENGLISH – A . GUIDE FOR LITERATURE STUDENTS (Robert Eaglestone) Ranked in harvard university application the list of more than 700 thousands of the essay on the justice world's best-selling books, Doing English is essay really a good choice that needed for the study of English college students. The author of the book – Robert Eaglestone, a lecturer in usc emba essays English at university application essay Royal Holloway, University of London, and Series Editor of Routledge Critical Thinkers –. Critical thinking , Elizabeth I of England , English literature 1248 Words | 4 Pages. Introduction In UK there are three main sources of for high school English law, Legislation (Statue Law), Common Law (Judge-made Law) and harvard university essay the European . Communities law. Sox Fatherhood Essay. Pg 41, Longshaw, (2002) The purpose of this report is to harvard university essay, explain the basis of Common made Law and also to explain duty of care, negligence, trespass, and consent. I will also look at how specific legislations instruct health care practitioners as to essay justice, their legal responsibilities. Statute Law Legislation however, is probably the most important source. Common law , Duty of care , English law 1994 Words | 6 Pages.

English for Management Recommendation Report. UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE ENGLISH FOR MANAGEMENT (UALE 2003) MAY TRIMESTER 2012 ASSIGNMENT 1: . INFORMAL REPORT TUTORIAL GROUP NO: T15 LECTURER’S NAME : TUTOR‘S NAME : MS.NUR AIZURI BINTI MD.AZMIN Item | Student’s Name | ID | Year / Sem. | 1. | CYHEETAL KAUR SANDHU D/O AUTAR SINGH | 1105929 | Y1/S1 | 2. Harvard Application. | LIM LIK KHOON | 1103683 | Y1/S1 | 3. | MALVEENN PREET KAUR GILL | 1105909 | Y1/S1 | 4. | TAN YONG KEAT | 1105969 |. Employment , Fast food restaurant , Food 1954 Words | 6 Pages. program. | |RSVP Company- 31C, Ly Tu Trong Street, 1 District. Gcse Physics Coursework Resistance. |Assist in the event activities: Concert, Activation, Party. . | |Magazine, Event, Acency. | Report event Activities: Powerpoint, Excel | | | | |4/2012-7/2012 . Dak Nong Province , Ecole superieure d'informatique reseaux et systemes d'information , Event planning 352 Words | 3 Pages. [pic] Queenwood Department of harvard university application prompt English Year 11 Assessment: Area of offshore oil drilling essay Study Task 2: Creative Response Due Date: Tuesday 13th . March (Day 2, Week 7) 2012 Word Limit: 800-1000 words Outcomes: P3, P4, P6-8, P11-13 Weighting: 10% ‘Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is university application prompt unhappy in its own way.’ Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy Using the essay on the justice stimulus provided, compose a narrative which demonstrates your understanding of harvard application prompt relationships. You will be. Anna Karenina , Assessment , Demonstration 306 Words | 3 Pages. background as a writer.

B.J. Gcse Physics. - B.J. was a manager at the first job Ehrenreich took during the university application essay experiment, at a restaurant in Key West. George- George was . a dishwasher in the Key West Restaurant. An immigrant from Czechoslovakia, George spoke little English and had trouble understanding the problems that were happening in the restaurant around him. He was eventually accused of stealing from the on the justice restaurant and university application prompt fired without understanding the reason. Ted- Is the manager of The Maids, a housekeeping. Barbara Ehrenreich , Cost , Nickel and Dimed 914 Words | 4 Pages. wondering if any of our workers would be interested in such a scheme. Essay Prompts For High School Seniors. Would you speak to a sample of them about harvard it and find out gcse coursework, their opsand then write a . report for me?

Any information or suggestions about harvard prompt this proposed scheme would be welcome.” Proposed Incentive Scheme Terms of reference Mr Jules Laval, Office Manager, has asked me to write this report on a proposed incentive scheme offering rewards, possibly financial, to members of essay staff for harvard application, money-saving or ways to improve work practices. Proceedings. Business letter , Creative writing , Idea 469 Words | 7 Pages. the significance of studying english history Report Theme: “The significance of studying history of . English language and its connection with the other disciplines” Effectuated by essays business, : Rotaru Cristina, group 402 B Chisinau, 2012 English Present and harvard essay prompt Future The History of English language as a cultural subject It was observed by the remarkable twelve-century chronicler Henry of on the criminal justice Huntingon that an interest in the past was one of the university essay prompt distinguished characteristics. England , English language , German language 1655 Words | 5 Pages.

Guess Paper – 2009 Class – X Subject – English (Grammar) Make regular practice of about English grammar at www.amuseonline.com . Learn English from home. email : amrita@amuseonline.com Max. Marks 25 Que. 1. The following passage has not been edited. There is an error in each of the line against which a blank is given. Underline the incorrect. Doctor , English grammar , English-language films 688 Words | 4 Pages.

(Found this online. Pretty helpful) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices ( SPM ) Copyright © 2007 by NCS . Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of application this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Physics Coursework. Pearson and TalentLens logos are trademarks, in the U.S. University Essay. and/or other countries. All rights reserved , Candidate , Conversion of physics coursework wire units 649 Words | 3 Pages. interim report Standardize procedures and maintain internal management system to harvard essay prompt, comply with local and China regulations Standardized all . accounting policies in usc emba essays Hong Kong and essay China and created a manual to essay on the, set out the harvard university essay prompt procedures Set up an e-payment system to process banking transactions, saving manpower costs by 20% Assistant Accountant, Deluxe Group Handle full set of accounts including cash management, accounts payable and white sox fatherhood accounts receivable function Prepare management report , annual.

Accountancy , Accountant , Accounting software 480 Words | 3 Pages. client projects for overhead allocations and other relevant entries. Was part of the university General Accounting and offshore essay timesheets tasks transition between Manila . Shared Service Center and Global Finance and Accounting, Chennai Tamil Nadu Skills: Fluent in application English and gcse physics coursework resistance Filipino Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, Power Point and university application essay Access and Oracle 11 Application Demonstrated interpersonal skills: equally effective, cooperative team player, hardworking, motivating and independent. Achievements: Certified. Accountancy , Accountant , Bookkeeping 425 Words | 3 Pages. Year 12 English Extension 2 Work Report “Children and fools speak the truth” From the many different options of major . works available in seniors Extension 2, I chose to write a short story as the creative aspect of this option was appealing. The reality of this course was not exactly what I had initially expected, and application essay prompt the first two terms which were nearly purely investigative were challenging. I believe that if I had begun writing earlier, and essay implementing research only when necessary, I would have. Antagonist , Creative writing , Fiction 1519 Words | 4 Pages. Government Company (d) Warehousing (4?5 Foundation Course in application English - 2 (FEG-02) Assignment All questions are compulsory.

Course Code: . FEG-03 Assignment Code: FEG-2/TMA/ZO I 1 - 12 Max. Marks: 100 1 Write a paragraph on any one of the following topics. (1 50-200 words) (1 0) .1. Protecting the environment 11 Impact of justice globalization on your culture iii Mercy Killing I Euthanasia iv Curbing Corruption 2 Write a report for a newspaper about the inaugural ceremony of a major sporting . Dinosaur , Endangered species , Evolution 704 Words | 3 Pages. 1 Techniques for Answering English Paper. TECHNIQUES FOR ANSWERING ENGLISH PAPER | MUKA UTAMA | [ Klik ke Menu ] | TECHNIQUES FOR ANSWERING THE SPM . ENGLISH PAPER (PAPER 2) a. DIRECTED WRITING In the university application prompt first section of the SPM English Paper 2, students are expected to offshore oil drilling essay, spend about thirty minutes, expanding on given notes. For this section, imagination and creativity do come into play because even though certain facts are given, they serve as a mere guide. You are required to university application essay, do at least three major things: 1. Use. Grammar , Linguistics , Meaning of life 1477 Words | 4 Pages. Masters Degree in essay Social Work (MSW), 1st Division - Specialisation: Community Development - Elective : project . Report 1995 – 1998 Utkal University, NISWASS, Bhubaneswar, Orissa Bachelors Degree in Social Work (BSW), passed in 1998 with general distinction Language known Oriya, English , Hindi Nepali |KEY EXPERTISE . Change management , Management , Organization 1299 Words | 7 Pages. Oral Report English 111 Written Report.

?Nikita J. Mattison Mercy College English 111 April 22nd, 2015 Female vs. Male Dominance In Susan Glaspell’s, “Trifles” and “A Doll’s House” . by Henry Ibsen, we noticed the vast similarity the prompt two stories share. Two different woman make a decision to take matters into their own hands by doing what they want to essays, do, no matter what the outcome may be and in harvard university application prompt spite of what society thinks. These two women come from on the criminal justice different homes and lead very different lives yet, these two women share similar situations-. A Doll's House , Henrik Ibsen 1435 Words | 6 Pages. Internship Report for Book Translation Name: GULIQIANTE, Connie Student ID: 50914346 Date: 28 July 2009 My internship experiences . start from the harvard snapshot task for SIZE magazine practically. But there wasn't a definite contract at that time, I just took over from one of my friend and photographed modern persons on essays about business plans the street to show the trend of fashion in Hong Kong. I have got the joy of meeting different kinds of people, talking to them and university essay recording their sparkling moments. And speaking.

China , Language , Literal translation 1221 Words | 3 Pages. dressed as a cavalry leader, was badly wounded; not wishing the British to capture her body, she told a hermit to burn it. After her death a few local people . cremated her body. The British captured the city of Gwalior after three days. Prompts For High Seniors. In the essay prompt British report of this battle, Hugh Rose commented that Rani Lakshmibai is personable, clever and beautiful and essay criminal justice she is the most dangerous of all Indian leaders.[35][36] Rose reported that she had been buried with great ceremony under a tamarind tree under the. Baji Rao II , British Raj , East India Company 2363 Words | 7 Pages. ?TECHNIQUES FOR ANSWERING THE SPM ENGLISH PAPER (PAPER 1) a. Harvard University. DIRECTED WRITING In the first section of the SPM . English Paper 2, students are expected to spend about thirty minutes, expanding on essay on the criminal justice given notes.

For this section, imagination and creativity do come into play because even though certain facts are given, they serve as a mere guide. You are required to do at least three major things: 1. Use the right format for harvard application essay, your writing 2. Include all the facts given in school seniors the question 3. Elaborate or provide. Claudia Palacios , Question , Sentence 2478 Words | 10 Pages. Advantages of Speaking English X [pic] John London John London is an English journalist who has been writing professionally . since 2006. His articles have appeared in major British newspapers such as The Times and The Guardian.

London holds a Master of Arts in journalism from the harvard university application essay University of the Arts London. By John London, eHow Contributor [pic]When you go abroad, English will probably be the single language many people will understand. English is known to be so useful throughout. British Empire , Commonwealth of Nations , England 586 Words | 3 Pages. Why English is oil drilling important in Job Requirement? A study conducted by one of the biggest agencies, Job.com, founded that lack of . communication skills in application essay both speaking and writing has caused the main reasons for the failure of graduates in seeking jobs. Essay. An English lecturer of University Utara Malaysia’s school of cognitive science and university application essay education, M.Puveneswary who taught English at coursework the University for university essay prompt, about 11 years said, there was a gap between English at the workplace and academic environments. British Empire , Commonwealth of white sox fatherhood Nations , Communication 1291 Words | 4 Pages.

THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS FULL! In the university last few years, the English language has undergone many changes. Dubbed the . Physics Wire. international language, English has become the university essay language that most people wish to learn. Usc Emba Essays. Many reasons explain such a choice but none explains it better than the harvard application essay prompt fact that the strongest economy still remains the United States of America. Being an about business, Englishspeaking country, its language radiates around the world. Most countries and national governments grant English a special.

Dialect , English language , French language 742 Words | 2 Pages. ?Nikoloz Vetsko 9/4/2014 Cause English The first time I read a book in English , and honestly a book in general, was in 5th . grade. I grew up in harvard university essay the Republic of Georgia, went to a public school for most of my first four years, with teachers that didn’t really care if I paid attention or really, if I was there at all. Prompts School. It was hard for me to care when they didn’t seem to, I wasn’t motivated to harvard university application essay, do anything, and in essay prompts school seniors fact it would be accurate to harvard university, say that in those first four years, I didn’t learn anything. British Empire , British Isles , Commonwealth of Nations 873 Words | 3 Pages. Priya Patel Mr. Frank English (4TH period) October 7, 2012 Should teen curfews be enforced ? There are many words or phrases that teens . dread hearing from their parents; one of these words is “curfew.” The topic of teenage curfews is usually a controversial one. Sox Fatherhood. Parents impose curfews to harvard university application essay prompt, protect their teens, and teens often feel this is an unfair limitation placed on usc emba essays them.

Many teens see the adolescent years as a time to break away from their family and harvard university application essay parents, and experience more freedom. Adolescence , Childhood , Crime 1069 Words | 3 Pages. English Week Programme Report - Primary School. ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC SPEAKING MONTH PROGRAMME REPORT . ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- SK SEMENGGOK ENGLISH LANGUAGE PANEL REPORT ON INTER CLASS PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETITION 2011 INTRODUCTION This year our school English Language Panel has carried out oil drilling essay, a public speaking competition as one of the panel programmes. This competition. Competition , Computer program , English language 1428 Words | 6 Pages. ?Chloe Winston Ms. McDaniel Honors English 9/6th period 2 September 2014 Societal corruption can be shown through Animalistic Behaviors. . Harvard University Essay. Thesis: In the classic novel Animal Farm, the author, George Orwell shows how societal corruption can occur through propaganda, pride, and hypocrisy. White Sox Fatherhood Essay. The book opens with a rebellion being led by the cows on the farm as they fought for their rights and better treatment. This rebellion began with secret meetings being held with all the animals on the farm.

Snowball. Animal Farm , Communism , Deception 830 Words | 3 Pages. language has been threatened because of promotion of application essay prompt English use with the development of media. Second, information by media is white sox fatherhood limited for . poor students. In Brunei, bilingual education system began in 1945. With the harvard university increasing use of English , media has been developed as well in justice last thirty years. Consequently, people can access to English anytime and university application everywhere.

For example, with the essay increase of TV channels with satellite people learned to watch more English TV programs and by the Internet, people came. Bandar Seri Begawan , Borneo , Brunei 1466 Words | 6 Pages. a complex sentence, a Senate committee is harvard essay prompt believed to have found. (The Age, 13 September 2007) Nothing unites a country more than its common language . because from a language comes a history and a culture. (John Howard quoted in Migrants to white sox fatherhood, sit English test, ABC Online, 11 December 2006) Linguists suggest that some people deliberately choose a low status accent as a way of prompt invoking prestige, although this is less common amongst women than men. The Australian-born children of migrants from Europe. Australian English , Culture of Australia , Dialect 942 Words | 3 Pages. To Maintain daily Cash amp; Bank Management * To undertake Ledger Scrutiny * To Maintain Bank Reconciliation Statements * To obtain online Bank . statements * To Prepare Management Information Report [MIS] according to the need of hour * To generate different MIS reports according to essay on the justice, Government amp; Funding Agency * To calculate Income tax Package * To calculate VAT * Familiar with TDS calculations * Independent letter drafting and university application essay prompt undertaking different correspondences . Accounting software , Accounts receivable , Bank statement 573 Words | 3 Pages.

Seminar Group: SEM003 WRITTEN AND SPOKEN ENGLISH Giving effective presentations is white sox fatherhood essay one of the essentials when competing in harvard application essay the . business world and taking up leadership positions. Yet, I was used to be a shy person, and afraid of public speaking before. Usc Emba Essays. I felt extremely nervous when making presentations in front of crowds. This year, being an Aiesecer member of the external relations team, it helps me to boost up my confidence in speaking English . I was given many opportunities to university application essay, meet the. Better , Business ethics , China 1563 Words | 5 Pages. schools involved. In the physics coursework wire past years, only 2 days were allocated to this event, however, with the outline of the harvard application essay diversity stage and an upsurge in the number . of offshore essay schools participating, the duration of the event extended to 4 days (SMC events LTD, annual report 2012) knowingly the complex of the planning required. It is safe to say that such processes involved in the planning and decision making of the application essay prompt ASB Polyfest and its difficulties has the potential to increase if the organisations involved are not loyal. Auckland , Auckland Region , Environmental impact assessment 1833 Words | 6 Pages. Islamic Studies(Old New Syllabi)/ Ethics (First Group)* English Language (First Group)** English (for B.Sc. Candidates) . For High School. Education, (First Group) Applied Psychology/ Psychology, Microbiology Journalism, Chemistry, Space Science A Comp.

A Evening: 2.00 P.M. TO 5.00 P.M. On Friday Only (2:30 P.M To5:30 P.M.) Subjects Sociology (Old New Syllabi), Library and Information Science Islamic Studies (Old New Syllabi)/ Ethics (Second Group) )* English Language (Second Group)** Paper A Comp. A A A 11th. Islam , Mathematics , Pakistan 559 Words | 3 Pages. making. Application Prompt. Here in this report it has been mentioned about the key roles which a strategic management accountant would undertake in an . Essay On The Justice. organisation. When considering the application prompt cost of a production process there are both relevant and irrelevant costs and it is important to about business plans, identify them separately. So here the meanings of university essay relevant and about business plans irrelevant costs have been discussed. Activity based costing is another method in cost accounting and it contains both benefits and problems. Here in this report benefits and problems.

Activity-based costing , Cost , Cost accounting 598 Words | 3 Pages. SPM Biology – Answering Techniques in Paper 3 SPM Biology candidates typically commit the mistake of thinking that the length . of their answered essay or structured questions equates to marks deserve, under the formula, Length of Structure Answer/Essay = Marks. Prompt. This is white essay wrong and Berry Berry Easy wishes to harvard university prompt, clear the air regarding this issue. Essays About Business. It is never about how long you write but more about how accurate you write. Harvard University Application. So for on the criminal, Berry Readers who can write long answers but never seemed to score well. 2 , 37 , Enzyme 1244 Words | 5 Pages. SPM Essay Directed Writing Year 2011/ 2012 Informal Letters Writing Letters the Right Way! This week we will take a look at letter . writing. Generally, students are taught to write two types of application prompt letters – formal letters and white sox fatherhood informal letters. Harvard University Application Essay. Informal letters are easier to write in prompts for high school terms of format, language and tone.

These letters are sometimes called social or friendly letters. Examples of informal letters include letters to family members and friends. When writing an harvard university essay prompt, informal letter. Eating , Essay , Formal system 323 Words | 3 Pages. trades with China. The colonies in Australia and New Zealand were also well maintained in plans order to protect the trading route. In India, however, the British . infiltrated the whole nation in a more intricate way than in any other of their colonies. The English language and culture were imposed on both schools and other official institutions. They even had their own army, the East India Company. When the Indians rebelled against the British colonization, this army brutally knocked them down.

Then the East. British Empire , Canada , Colonialism 1154 Words | 4 Pages. Best of the university essay Web How to Read a Poem Summary Summary Chapter Summaries Stanza I (Lines 1-11) Stanza II (Lines 12-30) Stanza III (Lines 31-54) . ADVERTISEMENT Table of offshore oil drilling essay Contents Stanza II (Lines 12-30) Summary The Poem Summary AP English Language AP English Literature SAT Test Prep ACT Exam Prep ADVERTISEMENT Stanza I (Lines 1-11) Summary Get out the microscope, because we’re going through this poem line-by-line. Lines 1-2 In Xanadu did Kubla Khan A stately pleasure dome. Genghis Khan , Kubla Khan , Kublai Khan 964 Words | 4 Pages. Jackie Stam Unit 5 Comp and Lit 1 Essay Holt tells us that joke books became routine after the first one was published in English in . 1484. Jokes remained fairly lowbrow until the middle of the 19th century when with especially the clever retort became prized in English culture. Harvard University Essay Prompt. A typical joke concerned a hefty fellow rushing to Florence late one evening. Offshore Oil Drilling. He asked a peasant “Do you think I’ll be able to make it through the harvard university city gate?” The man replied, “Why if a cart of hay can make it through.

Comedy , Humor , Joke 812 Words | 3 Pages. www.jntuworld.com || www.android.jntuworld.com || www.jwjobs.net || www.android.jwjobs.net Model Question Paper Subject Code:R13101/R13 I B. Tech I Sem . Regular Examinations Feb. - 2014 ENGLISH -I Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 70 Question Paper Consists of prompts seniors Part-A and harvard university application essay Part-B Answer All the questions in Part-A Any Three Questions should be answered from Part-B ***** PART-A 1. Compulsory Question which consists of grammar prescribed in essays about business the text book (12+5+5=22) A (i) Write the Synonyms. Airline , Comprehension , Following 319 Words | 4 Pages. ?GCSE English Language – Unit Three Spoken Language Study – 10% AO2 i. Understand variations in spoken language, explaining why language . changes in relation to contexts. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. ii. Evaluate the impact of spoken language choices in their own and others’ use. Essay Criminal. Example One Example Two Task Band / Grade Mark Description 5 24 23 22 21 Perceptive understanding of the way spoken language works.

Perceptive understanding of the ways spoken language changes according to harvard university essay prompt, context and for high why these. According to Jim , Awareness , ConTeXt 302 Words | 3 Pages. of your child’s behavior. Type response here (Make sure that you remove highlighting upon completion of assignment) 10 - 19 Months 1. Is your child . delayed or advanced in any area of harvard university application prompt development according to the 19-month developmental examiner’s report ? Based on essay criminal what you have studied, do you think this is university application essay prompt most likely a result of specific biological or environmental factors? Describe at least one area of delay or advance, explain whether or not you believe this is a result of white sox fatherhood biological or environmental. Adolescence , Childhood , Developmental psychology 1595 Words | 5 Pages. solving abilities.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Date of Birth : 05-07-1988 Sex : Male Pan No. : BGQPR7157C . Nationality : Indian Marital status : Married Spoken Languages : English , Hindi, Urdu Hobbies : Playing Outdoor and Indoor Games, Reading books and application essay making new Friends. DECLARATION I hereby affirm that the above mentioned facts are true to the best of my knowledge and I hope. Greatest hits , Insurance , Microsoft 457 Words | 3 Pages. Daven Thomas Mrs. Ellis 2nd Hour English 4/16/14 Gulliver’s More Dangerous Travels As Gulliver is swimming away from the Island of the . Brobdingnagians he is caught off guard by a Giant 400 ton whale. It snatches him up in his mouth as if he were krill and carries him over 10,000 miles across the ocean, then blows him out at essay justice the Island of prompt Abarat. Essays. Gulliver is harvard university essay prompt unconscious for at essays business plans least a few hours. When he finally comes to, he is harvard university essay prompt awoken by great band of hearty Pirates. They quickly tie him up.

American films , Gli equivoci , Piracy 891 Words | 3 Pages. Royal Military College of Canada Department of English ENE 110-4: Introduction to Literary Studies and University Writing Skills . Monday, 1000-1050; Wednesday, 1240-1330 ; Friday, 1000-1050 Instructor: Dr. Huw Osborne Office: M323 Phone: 6269 Email: osborne@rmc.ca Office Hours: by appointment Course Objectives There are two primary goals for this course: 1. Physics Resistance Wire. Above all, we are concerned with exploring literary expression with a simple desire to improve our abilities. An Imaginary Life , Final examination , Modern Language Association 872 Words | 6 Pages. ? Compare and Contrast Essay – Final Jennifer Hopes English 121 Mr. Walters March 7, 2014 Introduction While Narration follows a . logical order, typically chronological. Descriptive writing is application different from narrative writing because it uses vivid language. Narrative essay are clearly, less effective than descriptive essays, they narrow down every item and make conclusions for prompts for high school, the reader. Harvard. Descriptive essays are a major component of academic success; an effective writer does not allow the. Essay , Essays , First-person narrative 1500 Words | 7 Pages.

monitoring and inspection structure based on agreed quality standards. We have regular get together meetings and seminars with the Clubs to share ideas, best . practice and provide Clubs with ongoing training and information relevant to the programmer We report to essay on the criminal justice, our funding partners on the progress of the harvard Youth Development programme. This is to ensure the continuity of the funding provided to the Clubs and to support them in all areas of essays about business Youth Development. We would like to harvard essay, emphasize that we seek to provide. Academy , Aldershot F.C. , Aston Villa F.C. Business Plans. 1302 Words | 4 Pages. maps. 4. Give students time to develop their own mind maps and harvard university make connections in sox fatherhood essay their own way(s). 5. Display mind maps for students to refer to and use. Harvard. . 6. Explain that mind maps can be used in a variety of ways — as the basis for information reports , to usc emba essays, provide the application basis for organising information, as topics for further investigation. As an introduction to defining Humanity value students produced a mind map, recording what they already knew on the story using black pen.

Abuse , Concept map , Diagram 1239 Words | 5 Pages. “ English Not a Native Tongue” English as a second language is an offshore essay, issue now days. Many people that don’t speak or write . English , life tends to be a bit harsh on them. I personally have experience how difficult it is when one is university application essay prompt not born in a family where English is not the native language. I came across two great essays, written by white, Amy Tan and Richard Rodriguez. These two great authors wrote about the challenges they faced while growing up in families that English was not their native tongue. Tan. English language , Family , Father 1283 Words | 3 Pages.

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education LITERATURE ( ENGLISH ) Paper 3 . Unseen Additional Materials: *6929925437* 0486/32 May/June 2010 1 hour 20 minutes Answer Booklet/Paper READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST If you have been given an Answer Booklet, follow the instructions on application essay the front cover of the Booklet. On The Justice. Write your Centre number, candidate number and harvard application prompt name on all the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen. Essay. Do. Question , UCLES , University of Cambridge 1542 Words | 6 Pages. ENGLISH Paper 1 (Two Hours) Answer to this paper must be written on the paper provided separately. You will not be allowed to write during . the first 15 minutes. Application Essay. This time is to be spent in physics coursework resistance reading the question paper.

The time given at the head of the harvard university prompt paper is the time allowed for writing the answers. ________________________________________ Attempt all four questions. The intended marks for usc emba essays, questions or parts of questions are given in brackets [ ]. University Application. You are advised to spend not more than. Meaning of life , Narcolepsy , Polysomnography 1570 Words | 5 Pages. child. | |Connects both texts through content, but |Woolf’s purpose is also to usc emba essays, expose a harsh reality . underlying superficial social complacency. | |differentiates them through context |By 1928, English women had made some significant advances in university application the struggle for genuine equality| | |with men, particularly in being able to earn and retain their own incomes and to vote. They | | . Comedy , Edward Albee , Leonard Woolf 1387 Words | 5 Pages. defamatory nature is prohibited and wire may result in disciplinary action up to prompt, and including termination of oil drilling essay employment. STEP 3 Draft policy Policies . should be written in plain English and harvard essay prompt easily understood by all employees. Essay Prompts For High School Seniors. Consider translating the university essay prompt policies into appropriate languages for employees whose first language is not English . Ensure all employees understand what the policies mean. Explain how to comply with the policies and essays about business plans the implications of harvard application prompt not complying. Agree on a format to be used and seek. At-will employment , Bullying , Discrimination 1597 Words | 7 Pages.

?RESEARCH PROJECT REPORT (MBA - 043) ON “CREDIT POLICY LOANS DEPARTMENT OF HDFC SISTER CONCERN BRANCH HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LIMITED” . Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of offshore oil drilling Master of Business Administration (MBA) Programme: 2013 -14 Of Gautam Buddh Technical University, Lucknow Under the university prompt supervision of SUBMITTED BY- Prof. Manmohan Bansal Pradeep Shukla MBA Department . Bareilly , Bihar , Business school 423 Words | 3 Pages.

Write my essay -
Commonly Asked Questions: College Essays?! | Harvard College

7 Ways to Impress Recruiters with Your Resume. Recruiters are a justifiably jaded bunch. (Having been one, I know this for a fact!) They spend large amounts of harvard application essay, their time reading resumes and gcse physics coursework wire, they have seen every trick in the book. This makes them extremely hard to harvard university essay prompt impress. Trust me, if you think you#8217;ve come up with a creative way to hide your career flaws from a recruiter, you#8217;re wrong. They#8217;ve seen it before and offshore, they can spot it a mile off.

So how do you impress them? Here are 7 strategies that work: Don#8217;t use 10 words when 3 will do and harvard application, don#8217;t pepper your resume with big words because they sound impressive. Gcse Coursework Resistance! Recruiters want to harvard university application essay prompt know the facts about you and they don#8217;t want to wade through oceans of #8216;resume speak#8217; to get to those facts. Use simple, clear and essay prompts for high school seniors, direct language throughout your resume and you will have a head start on all the #8220;accomplished team leaders leveraging resources across global infrastructures, locations and satellites while delivering exceptional cost savings in university application cross-functional and highly matrixed organizations.#8221; Resume writing is one of the only endeavors where people seem to physics coursework think copying is the thing to harvard application do. If they#8217;ve seen words frequently on gcse coursework, other resumes, they assume those same words belong on theirs. So recruiters have had more than their fill of #8216;dynamic, results-oriented team players#8217; who #8216;think outside the box.#8217; Trust me if the best you can come up with is harvard prompt, #8216;think outside the box,#8217; you#8217;re not thinking outside the box. Recruiters are paid by their clients to find candidates who meet certain factual criteria for example, they may need someone with 10 years of industry experience, or someone with a history of essay, working in companies over a certain size, or leading teams of 100+. Whatever the criteria, it is fact-based.

Sure, the employer may also have specified some important personality traits, but they can#8217;t be judged based on essay prompt, your resume those will be evaluated during an offshore oil drilling essay interview. This means that your resume should cover all the application key facts a recruiter needs to essay know. Harvard Prompt! How many people a manager supervised. Seniors! How many users an IT person supported. Application! What budgets an oil drilling essay executive controlled. All these facts must be on your resume and harvard application prompt, easy to see.

At first glance this might seem contradictory. I just told you to be factual and now I#8217;m saying to show some personality. But by showing some personality, I don#8217;t mean straying from the facts. I just mean that you should present those facts in on the justice fresh and interesting language that reflects who you are. That#8217;s the best way to stand out from essay all those other dynamic, results-oriented team players#8217;

5. Write a profile that summarizes the important facts. I like to start resumes with a summary that describes my client in just a few lines. Some recruiters skip these altogether, but the ones who read them are not interested in generic claims or descriptions of how fabulous you are. Once again, they want the facts. School Seniors! Tell them how many years experience you have. Summarize 3 of your best accomplishments.

List the high-profile companies you#8217;ve worked for. In other words, select whatever facts are most impressive about you and use the resume profile to highlight those. Oh and drop the objective statement no recruiter cares what you want. Harvard Essay Prompt! He figures you#8217;ll worry about your own needs. He has a client to worry about. Spend almost no time on job responsibilities and instead use the space to tell a story of how you made an prompts school impact in university application prompt each of your jobs. Usc Emba Essays! If each section of your resume doesn#8217;t clearly show how you can make a difference, you are losing out on interviews. Don#8217;t tell me that your job required you to harvard application essay prompt handle filing for the whole department instead, tell me that you cleared a backlog of essay criminal, 8 months filing in just 2 weeks and then developed a system to harvard university application essay prompt keep things running smoothly.

That#8217;s the kind of information that makes a recruiter want to meet you. It#8217;s one thing to describe how fabulous you are, but it#8217;s quite another to validate those claims by providing evidence. Sox Fatherhood Essay! Have you won awards for your work? If so, highlight them right up front. Have you earned several promotions?

Say so in the introduction. Are all your performance reviews glowing? Tell them! Have all your former managers enthusiastically agreed to be references? Boast about that fact!

Any time your worth is validated by prompt someone else, use it on your resume. Impressing recruiters isn#8217;t easy but it#8217;s not impossible if you follow these 7 pointers. Prompts Seniors! If you#8217;d like more help with your resume, check out harvard essay prompt, my free resume writing course.(And if I missed anything, please feel free to offshore oil drilling essay add a comment). Love this article? Share it! About the Author. Louise co-founded Blue Sky in 2002 after a career as an HR executive. Her industry experience includes music, video games, fashion and advertising. She lived and worked in the US for many years, but moved back to harvard university essay her native UK in 2012, where she now lives in the Yorkshire countryside. In addition to her full-time role with Blue Sky, she's a professional artist, so you can imagine why she couldn't answer the 'what do you do with your free time' question! Contact Louise by email.

6 comments on “7 Ways to Impress Recruiters with Your Resume” Be very clear in defining the name of the job or job title you are so qualified for. Be specific. Avoid general terms such as: I am seeking a Management position. Well, OK, but what kind of Management position are you seeking? Marketers signal in on one product at a time and so will you! You will hit the usc emba essays bull’s eye when you define your precise career direction and put that down on paper. When your prospective employer reads it, they should have no doubt that you are seeking the exact job that they need filled. After starting your resume with your contact information, your next section will clearly start with your job objective. Once your prospective employer can see that what you bring to the table is what they want, they will continue to scan for more. Essay Prompt! Employers separate the essay on the criminal wheat from the chaff very quickly.

They look for objectives that meet with their own expectations. They know there are many prospects out there that really don’t know what they want. Employers are not looking for these types. Your objective will convey that your objective proves you will make the harvard application essay kind of contributions to the company that they need and want. Keep in mind, too, that an employer is oil drilling, looking for university application prompt, a candidate who will meet their own needs, and usc emba essays, not for one who is looking to meet his or her own goals and harvard university prompt, agenda. Your goal can be to offer this company your unique skill set and experience, but, the key is in putting that across in a way that proves you are their to essay service them and not the other way around. Your resume must grab them within the harvard university prompt first few seconds, so, your objective must be dynamite! Clearly state the job title you are going for and then add a few key phrases to show you will meet their exact needs#8230;more on this later. Prompts School Seniors! Great advice, Louise. I#8217;ve recently recorded an online Career Coaching QA video with clients, because get asked about resumes a lot #8216;How Important Is A Good C.V?#8217; (http://youtu.be/oFBuQV8Wcb4). As you can see, I advise that whilst a resume isn#8217;t appropriate in every case when it *is*, they need to seek out some good advice on how to pull theirs together.

I shall be directing them to this site in the future! Three Popular Articles you will kick yourself for not reading. Essay Prompt! Like what you see? Sign up to get our very best stuff sent by email. We hate spam so we#039;ll never do it and essays, we#039;ll never share your email address with anyone. is harvard university essay, a small team of professional writers and white sox fatherhood essay, job search experts based in the US and the UK. We offer one-of-a-kind resumes, smart career advice and fantastic customer service. We love what we do.

All Content © 2014 Blue Sky Resumes. Application Essay Prompt! Like what you see? Sign up to get our very best stuff sent by email. We hate spam so we#039;ll never do it and we#039;ll never share your email address with anyone.

Custom Essay Order -
Commonly Asked Questions: College Essays?! | Harvard College

compliance resume SUBJECT: EEOC COMPLIANCE MANUAL. PURPOSE: This transmittal covers the issuance of application essay prompt, Section 12 of the new Compliance Manual on “Religious Discrimination.” The section provides guidance and instructions for investigating and analyzing charges alleging discrimination based on religion. EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon receipt. DISTRIBUTION: EEOC Compliance Manual holders.

OBSOLETE DATA: This Section of the Compliance Manual replaces Section 628: Religious Accommodation , EEOC Compliance Manual, Volume II and its Appendices: Appendix A, Policy Statement on Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook and Religious Accommodation ; Appendix B, Policy Guidance On ‘New Age’ Training Programs Which Conflict With Employees’ Religious Beliefs ; and usc emba essays, Appendix C, Religious Objections to Unionism . It also replaces the university application, following policy documents: Religious Organizations that Pay Women Less than Men in Accordance with Religious Beliefs ; Religious Organization Exemption Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ; and about business, Policy Statement on application Goldman v. Weinberger (Accommodation of the Wearing of Religious Dress) . The Commission’s Guidelines on Discrimination Because of usc emba essays, Religion, 29 C.F.R. Part 1605, remain in effect. SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. This Section of the Compliance Manual focuses on religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). [2] Title VII protects workers from employment discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or protected activity. Solely with respect to religion, Title VII also requires reasonable accommodation of employees’ [3] sincerely held religious beliefs, observances, and practices when requested, unless accommodation would impose an undue hardship on business operations. [4] Undue hardship under Title VII is defined as “more than de minimis ” cost or burden -- a substantially lower standard for application prompt employers to satisfy than the “undue hardship” defense under the essays, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is defined instead as “significant difficulty or expense.” [5] The prohibition on discrimination and harvard prompt, the requirement of reasonable accommodation apply whether the religious views in question are mainstream or non-traditional, and even if not recognized by any organized religion. These protections also extend to those who profess no religious beliefs. [6] Questions about essay, religion in the workplace have increased as religious pluralism has increased.

In a 2001 survey of harvard university application essay prompt, human resource professionals conducted by the Society for on the justice Human Resource Management and the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 36% of human resource professionals who responded reported an increase in the religious diversity of their employees in the preceding five years. Prompt. [7] Further, the number of religious discrimination charges filed with EEOC has more than doubled from 1992 to 2007, although the total number of such charges remains relatively small compared to charges filed on other bases. [8] Many employers seek legal guidance in managing the issues that arise as religious diversity in the American workplace continues to increase. [9] This Section of the Compliance Manual is designed to be a practical resource for essay school employers, employees, practitioners, and EEOC enforcement staff on Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination. University Application Prompt. The Section defines religious discrimination, discusses typical scenarios in which religious discrimination may arise, and usc emba essays, provides guidance to university application essay employers on how to balance the needs of individuals in a diverse religious climate. Essay On The Justice. [10] The Section is organized by university application prompt legal topic, as follows: I - Coverage issues , including the definition of business plans, “religion” and “sincerely held,” the religious organization exception, and the ministerial exception. II - Disparate treatment analysis of employment decisions based on religion, including recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, and compensation, as well as differential treatment with respect to religious expression; customer preference; security requirements; and bona fide occupational qualifications. III - Harassment analysis , including religious belief or practice as a condition of employment or advancement, hostile work environment, and employer liability issues.

IV - Reasonable accommodation analysis , including notice of the conflict between religion and work, scope of the accommodation requirement and harvard university essay prompt, undue hardship defense, and common methods of usc emba essays, accommodation. V - Related forms of discrimination , including discrimination based on university application essay prompt national origin, race, or color, as well as retaliation. Some charges of religious discrimination may raise multiple claims, for example requiring analysis under disparate treatment, harassment, and denial of reasonable accommodation theories of liability. In addition, there are some instances where Title VII religious discrimination cases implicate federal constitutional provisions. [11] For example, a government employer may contend that granting a requested religious accommodation would pose an wire undue hardship because it would constitute government endorsement of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause of the university, First Amendment. White Sox Fatherhood Essay. [12] A private sector employer may contend that its own First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise or Free Speech Clauses would be violated if it is compelled by harvard university prompt Title VII to grant a particular accommodation. [13] In addition, government employees often raise claims under the First Amendment parallel to their Title VII accommodation claims. Criminal. [14] Defining the exact parameters of the First Amendment is beyond the scope of this document. Essay. However, these First Amendment issues are referenced throughout this document in order to illustrate how they often arise in usc emba essays Title VII cases. [15] Title VII prohibits covered employers, employment agencies, and unions [16] from: (1) treating applicants or employees differently (disparate treatment) based on their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof in any aspect of application essay prompt, employment, including recruitment, hiring, assignments, discipline, promotion, and benefits; (2) subjecting employees to harassment because of their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof or because of the religious practices or beliefs of people with whom they associate ( e.g. , relatives, friends, etc.); (3) denying a requested reasonable accommodation of an applicant’s or employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof if an accommodation will not impose an usc emba essays undue hardship on university application prompt the conduct of the business; [17] and, (4) retaliating against an applicant or employee who has engaged in protected activity, including participation ( e.g. , filing an EEO charge or testifying as a witness in someone else’s EEO matter), or opposition relating to coursework alleged religious discrimination ( e.g. , complaining to human resources department about alleged religious discrimination). Although more than one of these theories of harvard university application prompt, liability may apply in a particular case, they are discussed in separate parts of this manual for ease of coursework resistance wire, use.

Charges involving religion may give rise to claims for disparate treatment, harassment, denial of reasonable accommodation, and/or retaliation. Therefore, these charges should be investigated and analyzed under all four theories of liability to the extent applicable, even if the charging party only harvard university application essay prompt, raises one claim. Overview: Religion is very broadly defined under Title VII. Religious beliefs, practices, and observances include those that are theistic [18] in nature, as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is white, right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.” Religious beliefs can include unique views held by a few or even one individual; however, mere personal preferences are not religious beliefs. Harvard University Essay Prompt. Title VII requires employers to essays business plans accommodate religious beliefs, practices, and observances if the beliefs are “sincerely held” and harvard essay, the reasonable accommodation poses no undue hardship on the employer. Title VII defines “religion” to include “all aspects of religious observance and practice as well as belief.” [19] Religion includes not only traditional, organized religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, but also religious beliefs that are new, uncommon, not part of a formal church or sect, only criminal justice, subscribed to by a small number of people, or that seem illogical or unreasonable to others. [20] Further, a person’s religious beliefs “need not be confined in either source or content to traditional or parochial concepts of religion.” [21] A belief is “religious” for Title VII purposes if it is “‘religious’ in the person’s own scheme of things,” [22] i.e. , it is “a sincere and meaningful belief that occupies in the life of university essay, its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God.” [23] An employee’s belief or practice can be “religious” under Title VII even if the essay on the justice, employee is harvard university application, affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief or practice, or if few or no other people adhere to physics resistance wire it. [24]

Religious beliefs include theistic beliefs as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the harvard, strength of traditional religious views.” [25] Although courts generally resolve doubts about particular beliefs in favor of finding that they are religious, [26] beliefs are not protected merely because they are strongly held. Rather, religion typically concerns “ultimate ideas” about usc emba essays, “life, purpose, and harvard essay, death.” [27] Social, political, or economic philosophies, as well as mere personal preferences, are not “religious” beliefs protected by Title VII. [28] Religious observances or practices include, for example, attending worship services, praying, wearing religious garb or symbols, displaying religious objects, adhering to certain dietary rules, proselytizing or other forms of white sox fatherhood, religious expression, or refraining from certain activities. Determining whether a practice is harvard prompt, religious turns not on usc emba essays the nature of the activity, but on the employee’s motivation. The same practice might be engaged in by one person for religious reasons and by another person for purely secular reasons.

Whether or not the practice is “religious” is therefore a situational, case-by-case inquiry. Application. [29] For example, one employee might observe certain dietary restrictions for religious reasons while another employee adheres to usc emba essays the very same dietary restrictions but for university secular ( e.g. Coursework Resistance. , health or environmental) reasons. [30] In that instance, the same practice might in one case be subject to reasonable accommodation under Title VII because an employee engages in the practice for religious reasons, and in harvard university application essay prompt another case might not be subject to reasonable accommodation because the practice is white sox fatherhood, engaged in for harvard university secular reasons. The following examples illustrate these concepts: Employment Decisions Based on “Religion” An otherwise qualified applicant is not hired because he is a self-described evangelical Christian. Essay Prompts School Seniors. A qualified non-Jewish employee is application essay prompt, denied promotion because the supervisor wishes to give a preference based on religion to on the criminal justice a fellow Jewish employee. An employer terminates an employee based on his disclosure to the employer that he has recently converted to the Baha’i Faith. Harvard. Each of these is an example of an employment decision based on the religious affiliation of the applicant or employee, and therefore is based on “religion” within the meaning of Title VII.

Religious Practice versus Secular Practice. A Seventh-day Adventist employee follows a vegetarian diet because she believes it is religiously prescribed by usc emba essays the scriptural passage “[b]ut flesh with the harvard essay, life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat,” (Genesis 9:4). Her vegetarianism is a religious practice, even though not all Seventh-day Adventists share this belief or follow this practice, and even though many individuals adhere to a vegetarian diet for purely secular reasons. Types of white sox fatherhood, Religious Practice or Observance. A Catholic employee requests a schedule change so that he can attend church services on Good Friday. A Muslim employee requests an exception to the company’s dress and grooming code allowing her to wear her headscarf, or a Hindu employee requests an university essay exception allowing her to wear her bindi (religious forehead marking). An atheist asks to be excused from the for high, religious invocation offered at the beginning of staff meetings. An adherent to Native American spiritual beliefs seeks unpaid leave to attend a ritual ceremony. An employee who identifies as Christian but is not affiliated with a particular sect or denomination requests accommodation of university essay prompt, his religious belief that working on his Sabbath is prohibited.

Each of criminal, these accommodation requests relates to a “religious” belief or practice within the meaning of harvard university essay prompt, Title VII. By contrast, a request for a schedule change to help set up decorations or prepare food for essays business a church event, for instance, typically does not involve a “religious” belief or practice within the meaning of Title VII. [31] Supervisor Considers Belief Illogical. Morgana asks for time off on October 31 to attend the “Samhain Sabbat,” the New Year observance of Wicca, her religion. Her supervisor refuses, saying that Wicca is not a “real” religion but an university prompt “illogical conglomeration” of “various aspects of the occult, such as faith healing, self?hypnosis, tarot card reading, and spell casting, which are not religious practices.” The supervisor’s refusal to accommodate her on the ground that he believes her religion is illogical violates Title VII unless the employer can show her request would impose an undue hardship.

The law applies to religious beliefs even though others may find them “incorrect” or “incomprehensible.” [32] Unique Belief Can Be Religious. Edward practices the sox fatherhood essay, Kemetic religion, based on ancient Egyptian faith, and affiliates himself with a tribe numbering fewer than ten members.He states that he believes in various deities, and follows the faith’s concept of Ma’at, a guiding principle regarding truth and harvard university application prompt, order that represents physical and moral balance in the universe. During a religious ceremony he received small tattoos encircling his wrist, written in the Coptic language, which express his servitude to offshore oil drilling essay Ra, the Egyptian god of the sun. When his employer asks him to cover the tattoos, he explains that it is a sin to cover them intentionally because doing so would signify a rejection of Ra. These can be religious beliefs and practices even if no one else or few other people subscribe to university application prompt them. [33] Personal Preference That is Not a Religious Belief. Sylvia wears several tattoos and gcse, has recently had her nose and application essay prompt, eyebrows pierced. A newly hired manager implements a dress code that requires that employees have no visible piercings or tattoos. Sylvia says that her tattoos and piercings are religious because they reflect her belief in body art as self-expression and white sox fatherhood, should be accommodated.

However, the harvard university essay prompt, evidence demonstrates that her tattoos and piercings are not related to any religious belief system. White Sox Fatherhood Essay. For example, they do not function as a symbol of any religious belief, and do not relate to any “ultimate concerns” such as life, purpose, death, humanity’s place in the universe, or right and harvard essay, wrong, and they are not part of a moral or ethical belief system. Therefore, her belief is a personal preference that is not religious in nature. [34] Title VII requires employers to accommodate only those religious beliefs that are “sincerely held.” [35] Therefore, whether or not a religious belief is “sincerely held” by an applicant or employee is only relevant to religious accommodation, not to claims of white sox fatherhood, disparate treatment or harassment because of religion. In those claims, it is the motivation of the discriminating official, not the harvard application, actual beliefs of the individual alleging discrimination, that are typically relevant in determining if the essay prompts for high seniors, discrimination that occurred was because of religion. A detailed discussion of reasonable accommodation of sincerely held religious beliefs appears in § IV, but the meaning of harvard university application prompt, “sincerely held” is addressed here. Like the “religious” nature of essay prompts seniors, a belief or practice, the “sincerity” of an employee’s stated religious belief is usually not in dispute. Harvard University Prompt. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances in which an employer may assert as a defense that it was not required to provide accommodation because the employee’s asserted religious belief was not sincerely held.

Factors that either alone or in combination might undermine an employee’s assertion that he sincerely holds the religious belief at issue include: whether the employee has behaved in a manner markedly inconsistent with the professed belief; [36] whether the accommodation sought is a particularly desirable benefit that is likely to be sought for secular reasons; whether the justice, timing of the request renders it suspect ( e.g. , it follows an earlier request by the employee for the same benefit for secular reasons); and whether the employer otherwise has reason to believe the accommodation is not sought for religious reasons. However, none of these factors is dispositive. For example, although prior inconsistent conduct is relevant to the question of sincerity, an essay individual’s beliefs or degree of adherence may change over time, and therefore an employee’s newly adopted or inconsistently observed religious practice may nevertheless be sincerely held. Essay On The Justice. [37] An employer also should not assume that an employee is insincere simply because some of his or her practices deviate from the commonly followed tenets of his or her religion. [38] 3. Employer Inquiries into Religious Nature or Sincerity of Belief. Because the harvard university, definition of religion is broad and protects beliefs and practices with which the employer may be unfamiliar, the employer should ordinarily assume that an employee’s request for religious accommodation is essay school seniors, based on a sincerely-held religious belief. If, however, an employee requests religious accommodation, and an employer has an objective basis for university application questioning either the religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief or practice, the employer would be justified in seeking additional supporting information. See infra § IV-A-2. If the Respondent (R) disputes that the Charging Party’s (“CP’s”) belief is “religious,” consider the offshore oil drilling essay, following: Begin with the harvard essay, CP’s statements. What religious belief or practice does the CP claim to white have? In some cases, the CP’s credible testimony regarding his belief or practice will be sufficient to demonstrate that it is religious.

In other cases, however, the harvard essay prompt, investigator may need to ask follow-up questions about the offshore, nature and tenets of the asserted religious beliefs, and/or any associated practices, rituals, clergy, observances, etc., in university application essay prompt order to about business plans identify a specific religious belief or practice or determine if one is at issue. Since religious beliefs can be unique to an individual, evidence from harvard university application others is not always necessary. However, if the CP believes such evidence will support his or her claim, the essay, investigator should seek evidence such as oral statements, affidavits, or other documents from CP’s religious leader(s) if applicable, or others whom CP identifies as knowledgeable regarding the religious belief or practice in question. Remember, where an alleged religious practice or belief is at issue, a case-by-case analysis is required. Investigators should not make assumptions about a religious practice or belief. In some cases, to application determine whether CP’s asserted practice or belief is “religious” as defined under Title VII, the investigator’s general knowledge will be insufficient, and additional objective information will have to be obtained, while nevertheless recognizing the essays about plans, intensely personal characteristics of adherence to a religious belief. If the Respondent disputes that CP’s belief is “sincerely held,” the harvard university essay, following evidence may be relevant:

Oral statements, an affidavit, or other documents from CP describing his or her beliefs and offshore oil drilling, practices, including information regarding when CP embraced the belief or practice, as well as when, where, and university prompt, how CP has adhered to the belief or practice; and/or, Oral statements, affidavits, or other documents from essay prompts school potential witnesses identified by CP or R as having knowledge of whether CP adheres or does not adhere to the belief or practice at harvard university application, issue ( e.g ., CP’s religious leader (if applicable), fellow adherents (if applicable), family, friends, neighbors, managers, or co-workers who may have observed his past adherence or lack thereof, or discussed it with him). Overview: Title VII jurisdictional rules apply to all religious discrimination claims under the statute. However, specially-defined “religious organizations” and “religious educational institutions” are exempt from essay certain religious discrimination provisions, and a “ministerial exception” bars Title VII claims by employees who serve in clergy roles. Title VII’s prohibitions apply to prompt employers, employment agencies, and unions, [39] subject to the statute’s jurisdictional requirements.

See EEOC Compliance Manual, “Threshold Issues,” https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/threshold.html. Those covered entities must carry out offshore oil drilling essay their activities in a nondiscriminatory manner and harvard, provide reasonable accommodation unless doing so would impose an for high school undue hardship. [40] Unions also can be liable if they knowingly acquiesce in employment discrimination against university application prompt, their members, join or tolerate employers’ discriminatory practices, or discriminatorily refuse to represent employees’ interests. White. [41] Under Title VII, religious organizations are permitted to give employment preference to members of university, their own religion. On The. [42] The exception applies only to harvard university application essay those institutions whose “purpose and character are primarily religious.” [43] That determination is to be based on “[a]ll significant religious and secular characteristics.” [44] Although no one factor is for high school seniors, dispositive, significant factors to consider that would indicate whether an entity is harvard university essay, religious include: Do its articles of incorporation state a religious purpose? Are its day-to-day operations religious ( e.g. , are the gcse resistance wire, services the entity performs, the harvard application prompt, product it produces, or the educational curriculum it provides directed toward propagation of the religion)? Is it not-for-profit? Is it affiliated with or supported by a church or other religious organization? [45] This exception is not limited to criminal justice religious activities of the organization. [46] However, it only harvard application, allows religious organizations to prefer to employ individuals who share their religion. [47] The exception does not allow religious organizations otherwise to discriminate in employment on protected bases other than religion, such as race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. [48] Thus, a religious organization is not permitted to engage in racially discriminatory hiring by school seniors asserting that a tenet of its religious beliefs is not associating with people of other races. Similarly, a religious organization is not permitted to deny fringe benefits to married women but not to married men by asserting a religiously based view that only men can be the head of university, a household. Sex Discrimination Not Excused.

Justina works at essay, Tots Day Care Center. Tots is run by a religious organization that believes that, while women may work outside of the harvard application prompt, home if they are single or have their husband’s permission, men should be the about, heads of their households and the primary providers for their families. Believing that men shoulder a greater financial responsibility than women, the university essay prompt, organization pays female teachers less than male teachers. The organization’s practice of unequal pay based on essay justice sex constitutes unlawful discrimination. [49] Courts have held, based on First Amendment constitutional considerations, that clergy members cannot bring claims under the federal employment discrimination laws, including Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, because “[t]he relationship between an harvard university organized church and its ministers is its lifeblood.” [50] This “ministerial exception” comes not from the text of the statutes, but from the First Amendment principle that governmental regulation of white, church administration, including the appointment of university prompt, clergy, impedes the free exercise of religion and constitutes impermissible government entanglement with church authority. [51] Thus, courts will not ordinarily consider whether a church’s employment decision concerning one of essay for high, its ministers was based on discriminatory grounds, although some courts have allowed ministers to bring sexual harassment claims. [52] The ministerial exception applies only to application those employees who perform essentially religious functions, namely those whose primary duties consist of engaging in church governance, supervising a religious order, or conducting religious ritual, worship, or instruction. [53] The exception is not limited to ordained clergy, [54] and has been applied by courts to others involved in clergy-like roles who conduct services or provide pastoral counseling. However, the exception does not necessarily apply to everyone with a title typically conferred upon clergy ( e.g. Essays. , minister). [55] In short, in each case it is necessary to make a factual determination of whether the function of the position is harvard university prompt, one to which the exception applies. Title VII’s prohibition against disparate treatment based on religion generally functions like its prohibition against disparate treatment based on race, color, sex, or national origin.

Disparate treatment violates the statute whether motivated by essay prompts for high seniors bias against or preference toward an applicant or employee due to his religious beliefs, practices, or observances or lack thereof. Thus, for harvard university application essay prompt example, except to the extent permitted by essay prompts for high seniors the religious organization and harvard university application prompt, ministerial exceptions, an employer may not refuse to recruit, hire, or promote individuals of a certain religion, may not impose stricter promotion requirements for persons of usc emba essays, a certain religion, and may not impose more or different work requirements on an employee because of that employee’s religious beliefs or practices. [56] The following sub-sections address work scenarios that may lead to claims of religious discrimination. 1. Harvard Prompt. Recruitment, Hiring, and Promotion. Employers that are not religious organizations may neither recruit individuals of a particular religion nor adopt recruitment practices, such as word-of-mouth recruitment, that have the purpose or effect of discriminating based on religion. Title VII permits employers that are not religious organizations to hire and employ employees on the basis of about, religion only if religion is “a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of application essay, that particular business or enterprise.” [57]

For example, an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant simply because he does not share the employer’s religious beliefs, and conversely may not select one applicant over another based on a preference for employees of a particular religion. [58] Similarly, employment agencies may not comply with requests from employers to about engage in discriminatory recruitment or referral practices, for example by screening out essay applicants who have names often associated with a particular religion ( e.g., Mohammed). Moreover, an employer may not exclude an essay applicant from hire merely because he or she may need a reasonable accommodation that could be provided absent undue hardship. [59] Charles, the president of a company that owns several gas stations, needs managers for the new convenience stores he has decided to add to the stations. He posts a job announcement at university application, the Hindu Temple he attends and asks other members of the temple to on the criminal refer only Hindu friends or family members who may be interested in the position. He does no other recruitment. By limiting his recruitment to university prompt Hindus, Charles is engaging in unlawful discrimination. Mary is a human resources officer who is filling a vacant administrative position at her company. During the gcse, application process, she performs an Internet search on the candidates and learns that one applicant, Jonathan, has written an article for the local chapter of the Ethical Society setting forth his view that religion has been historically divisive and explaining why he subscribes to prompt no religious beliefs or practices.

Although Mary believes he is the business plans, most qualified candidate, she does not hire him because she knows that many current company employees are observant Christians like her, and she believes they would be more comfortable working with someone like-minded. By not hiring Jonathan because of his lack of religious identification, the company violated Title VII. Darpak, who practices Buddhism, holds a Ph.D. degree in engineering and applied for a managerial position at the research firm where he has worked for ten years. He was rejected in favor of a non-Buddhist candidate who was less qualified. The company vice president who made the promotion decision advised Darpak that he was not selected because “we decided to go in a different direction.” However, the vice president confided to co-workers at a social function that he did not select Darpak because he thought a Christian manager could make better personal connections with the firm’s clients, many of whom are Christian. The vice president’s statement, combined with the lack of any legitimate non-discriminatory reason for selecting the less qualified candidate, as well as the evidence that Darpak was the best qualified candidate for essay prompt the position, suggests that the proffered reason was a pretext for discrimination against Darpak because of his religious views. [60] Title VII also prohibits employers from usc emba essays disciplining or discharging employees because of their religion. [61] Joanne, a retail store clerk, is harvard university, frequently 10-15 minutes late for her shift on gcse coursework resistance several days per week when she attends Mass at harvard university, a Catholic Church across town. Her manager, Donald, has never disciplined her for this tardiness, and instead filled in for her at the cash register until she arrived, stating that he understood her situation. On the other hand, Yusef, a newly hired clerk who is essay seniors, Muslim, is harvard university application, disciplined by Donald for arriving 10 minutes late for his shift even though Donald knows it is about plans, due to harvard application prompt his attendance at services at the local Mosque.

While Donald can require all similarly situated employees to be punctual, he is essays business plans, engaging in disparate treatment based on religion by disciplining only university application essay prompt, Yusef and not Joanne absent a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for treating them differently. A charge alleging the above facts might also present a claim for denial of reasonable accommodation. While the employer may require employees to offshore oil drilling be punctual, it may have to accommodate an employee who seeks leave or a schedule change to resolve the conflict between religious services and a work schedule, unless the accommodation would pose an undue hardship. [62] 3. Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, or Privileges of Employment. Title VII prohibits discrimination on a protected basis “with respect to . University Essay Prompt. . Oil Drilling. . compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” for example, setting or adjusting wages, granting benefits, and/or providing leave in a discriminatory fashion. [63] Wages and Benefits. Janet, who practices Native American spirituality, is a newly hired social worker for an agency. As a benefit to its employees, the agency provides tuition reimbursement for professional continuing education courses offered by selected providers. Janet applied for tuition reimbursement for application essay prompt an approved course that was within permitted cost limit. Janet’s supervisor denied her request for tuition reimbursement, stating that since Janet believes in “voodoo” she “won’t make a very good caseworker.” By refusing, because of Janet’s religious beliefs, to provide the tuition reimbursement to which Janet was otherwise entitled as a benefit of her employment, Janet’s supervisor has discriminated against Janet on the basis of religion. Title VII’s prohibition on disparate treatment based on religious beliefs also can apply to disparate treatment of religious expression in the workplace. [64]

Eve is a secretary who displays a Bible on her desk at work. Xavier, a secretary in the same workplace, begins displaying a Quran on his desk at work. Their supervisor allows Eve to retain the Bible but directs Xavier to put the Quran out of view because, he states, co-workers “will think you are making a political statement, and with everything going on in the white essay, world right now we don’t need that around here.” This differential treatment of similarly situated employees with respect to university application prompt the display of a religious item at work constitutes disparate treatment based on religion in gcse physics wire violation of Title VII. University Application Essay. [65] Charges involving religious expression may present claims not only business, of disparate treatment, but also of university application, harassment and/or denial of reasonable accommodation. Investigation of claims of on the criminal justice, harassment and harvard application prompt, denial of reasonable accommodation are addressed respectively in §§ III and IV of this document. As discussed in greater detail in oil drilling those sections, Title VII requires employers to accommodate expression that is based on application essay a sincerely held religious practice or belief, unless it threatens to constitute harassment or otherwise poses an undue hardship on the conduct of the business. Prompts For High Seniors. Thus, for application essay prompt example, an employer can restrict religious expression where it would cause customers or co-workers reasonably to perceive the materials to express the employer’s own message, or where the item or message in question is sox fatherhood essay, harassing or otherwise disruptive. [66] For further discussion of how to analyze when accommodation of religious expression would pose an university essay undue hardship, refer to prompts for high seniors the sections on university application prompt Harassment at § III-C and Accommodation at § IV-C-6. If an employer takes an white sox fatherhood essay action based on harvard application the discriminatory preferences of essay for high, others, including co-workers or clients, the employer is university, unlawfully discriminating. Employment Decision Based on Customer Preference. Harinder, who wears a turban as part of his Sikh religion, is hired to work at the counter in a coffee shop. A few weeks after Harinder begins working, the manager notices that the work crew from the construction site near the shop no longer comes in for coffee in the mornings.

When he inquires, the crew complains that Harinder, whom they mistakenly believe is usc emba essays, Muslim, makes them uncomfortable in light of the September 11 th attacks. The manager tells Harinder that he has to harvard application essay let him go because the customers’ discomfort is offshore, understandable. The manager has subjected Harinder to unlawful religious discrimination by taking an adverse action based on customers’ preference not to have a cashier of Harinder’s perceived religion. Harvard Essay. Harinder’s termination based on customer preference would violate Title VII regardless of whether he was Muslim, Sikh, or any other religion. In general, an employer may adopt security requirements for white essay its employees or applicants, provided they are adopted for nondiscriminatory reasons and are applied in a nondiscriminatory manner. For example, an harvard university application prompt employer may not require Muslim applicants to essay justice undergo a background investigation or more extensive security procedures because of their religion while not imposing the same requirements on similarly situated applicants who are non-Muslim, unless such job requirements are imposed by federal statute or Executive Order in the interest of national security. Harvard University Essay. [67]

D. White Essay. Bona Fide Occupational Qualification. Title VII permits employers to hire and employ employees on the basis of harvard university application essay, religion if religion is “a bona fide occupational qualification [“BFOQ”] reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise.” [68] Religious organizations do not typically need to rely on this BFOQ defense, however, because the “religious organization” exception in Title VII permits them to prefer their co-religionists. See supra § I-C. It is well settled that for employers that are not religious organizations and therefore seek to rely on the BFOQ defense to justify a religious preference, the defense is physics resistance wire, a narrow one and harvard university application essay, can rarely be successfully invoked. [69] Employers can reduce the risk of discriminatory employment decisions by establishing written objective criteria for wire evaluating candidates for hire or promotion and university, applying those criteria consistently to all candidates. In conducting job interviews, employers can ensure nondiscriminatory treatment by asking the same questions of all applicants for a particular job or category of job and inquiring about matters directly related to the position in question. Essay On The Criminal. Employers can reduce the risk of religious discrimination claims by carefully and timely recording the accurate business reasons for disciplinary or performance?related actions and sharing these reasons with the harvard university, affected employees. When management decisions require the exercise of subjective judgment, employers can reduce the risk of discriminatory decisions by providing training to inexperienced managers and encouraging them to consult with more experienced managers or human resources personnel when addressing difficult issues.

If an employer is oil drilling essay, confronted with customer biases, e.g., an adverse reaction to being served by an employee due to harvard essay prompt religious garb, the employer should consider engaging with and educating the customers regarding any misperceptions they may have and/or the equal employment opportunity laws. Overview: Religious harassment is analyzed and proved in the same manner as harassment on other Title VII bases, e.g., race, color, sex, or national origin. [70] However, the facts of religious harassment cases may present unique considerations, especially where the alleged harassment is usc emba essays, based on another employee’s religious practices a situation that may require an employer to reconcile its dual obligations to take prompt remedial action in response to alleged harassment and to accommodate certain employee religious expression. Religious harassment in violation of Title VII occurs when employees are: (1) required or coerced to abandon, alter, or adopt a religious practice as a condition of essay prompt, employment (this type of “quid pro quo” harassment may also give rise to a disparate treatment or denial of essays business plans, accommodation claim in some circumstances), [71] or (2) subjected to application essay unwelcome statements or conduct that is based on religion and is so severe or pervasive that the individual being harassed reasonably finds the work environment to be hostile or abusive, and there is a basis for holding the employer liable. [72] 1. Religious Coercion That Constitutes a Tangible Employment Action. Title VII is violated when an employer or supervisor explicitly or implicitly coerces an employee to abandon, alter, or adopt a religious practice as a condition of receiving a job benefit or avoiding an adverse action. [73] Religious Conformance Required for Promotion. Wamiq was raised as a Muslim but no longer practices Islam. Essays. His supervisor, Arif, is a very devout Muslim who tries to persuade Wamiq not to application essay prompt abandon Islam and advises him to follow the teachings of the Quran. Arif also says that if Wamiq expects to advance in the company, he should join Arif and other Muslims for weekly prayer sessions in Arif’s office. Notwithstanding this pressure to conform his religious practices in order to be promoted, Wamiq refused to attend the weekly prayer sessions, and was subsequently denied the promotion for which he applies even though he was the most qualified. Arif’s conduct indicates that the promotion would have been granted if Wamiq had participated in the prayer sessions and usc emba essays, had become an observant Muslim.

Absent contrary evidence, the employer will be liable for harassment for conditioning Wamiq’s promotion on harvard university essay his adherence to Arif’s views of about business plans, appropriate religious practice. Harvard. [74] This would also be actionable as disparate treatment based on religion. In addition, if the prayer sessions were made mandatory and Wamiq had asked to be excused on religious grounds, Arif would have been required to excuse him from the criminal, prayer sessions as a reasonable accommodation. A claim of harassment based on coerced religious participation or non-participation, however, only arises where it was intended to make the employee conform to or abandon a religious belief or practice. By contrast, an employer would not be engaging in coercion if it required an employee to participate in a workplace activity that conflicts with the employee’s sincerely held religious belief, so long as the employer demonstrates that it would impose an undue hardship to accommodate the employee’s request to application essay be excused. Offshore. However, the same fact pattern may give rise to claims of disparate treatment, harassment, and/or denial of accommodation. University Application Essay. For example, terminating rather than accommodating an sox fatherhood essay employee may give rise to both denial of essay, accommodation and discriminatory discharge claims. [75] For discussion of the accommodation issue, see § IV, infra .[76] Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination can also be violated if the sox fatherhood essay, employee is subjected to a hostile work environment because of religion. [77] An unlawful hostile environment based on religion might take the harvard application, form of either verbal or physical harassment or unwelcome imposition of religious views or practices on an employee. A hostile work environment is created when the “workplace is permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that is essay, sufficiently severe or pervasive to application alter the conditions of the victim’s employment and physics resistance wire, create an abusive working environment.” [78] To establish a case of religious harassment, an employee must show that the harassment was: (1) based on university his religion; (2) unwelcome; (3) sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the gcse coursework, conditions of employment by university essay prompt creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment; and, (4) that there is essay justice, a basis for employer liability. [79] To support a religious harassment claim, the adverse treatment must be based on religion. [80] This standard can be satisfied regardless of whether the harassment is motivated by the religious belief or observance or lack thereof of harvard university application prompt, either the harasser or the targeted employee.

Moreover, while verbally harassing conduct clearly is based on religion if it has religious content, harassment can also be based on religion even if religion is not explicitly mentioned. [81] Harassing Conduct Based on Religion Religion Mentioned. Mohammed is an Indian-born Muslim employed at a car dealership. Because he takes scheduled prayer breaks during the work day and observes Muslim dietary restrictions, his co-workers are aware of his religious beliefs. Upset about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, his co-workers and managers began making mocking comments about his religious dietary restrictions and essays business plans, need to pray during the harvard university essay prompt, workday. They repeatedly referred to him as “Taliban” or “Arab” and asked him “why don’t you just go back where you came from sox fatherhood essay since you believe what you believe?” When Mohammed questioned why it was mandatory for all employees to application essay attend a United Way meeting, his supervisor said: “This is America.

That’s the essays about business, way things work over here. This is not the Islamic country where you come from.” After this confrontation, the supervisor issued Mohammed a written warning stating that he “was acting like a Muslim extremist” and that the supervisor could not work with him because of his “militant stance.” This harassment is university essay, “based on” religion and national origin. [82] Harassing Conduct Based on Religion Religion Not Mentioned. Shoshanna is essay for high seniors, a Seventh-day Adventist whose work schedule was adjusted to accommodate her Sabbath observance, which begins at sundown each Friday. When Nicholas , the new head of Shoshanna’s department, was informed that he must accommodate her, he told a colleague that “anybody who cannot work regular hours should work elsewhere.” Nicholas then moved the regular Monday morning staff meetings to late Friday afternoon, repeatedly scheduled staff and client meetings on Friday afternoons, and often marked Shoshanna AWOL when she was not scheduled to work.

In addition, Nicholas treated her differently than her colleagues by, for example, denying her training opportunities and loudly berating her with little or no provocation. Although Nicholas did not mention Shoshanna’s religion, the evidence shows that his conduct was because of Shoshanna’s need for religious accommodation, and therefore was “based on” religion. Application Prompt. [83] To be unlawful, harassing conduct must be unwelcome. Conduct is “unwelcome” when the employee did not solicit or incite it and regards it as undesirable or offensive. Prompts School Seniors. [84] It is application prompt, necessary to gcse wire evaluate all of the surrounding circumstances to determine whether or not particular conduct or remarks are unwelcome. [85] For example, where an application essay employee is upset by essay prompts school seniors repeated mocking use of university application, derogatory terms or comments [86] about usc emba essays, his religious beliefs or observance by a colleague, it may be evident that the conduct is unwelcome. This would stand in prompt stark contrast to a situation where the same two employees were engaged in a consensual conversation that involves a spirited debate of gcse physics, religious views, and neither employee indicates that he was upset by it. The distinction between welcome and unwelcome conduct is especially important in the religious context in situations involving proselytizing of employees who have not invited such conduct. [87] Where a religious employee attempts to persuade a non-religious employee of the correctness of his belief, or vice versa, the conduct may or may not be welcome. When an harvard application prompt employee objects to essay on the justice particular religious expression, unwelcomeness is evident. [88] Beth’s colleague, Bill, repeatedly talked to essay her at work about her prospects for salvation. For several months, she did not object and discussed the matter with him. When he persisted even after she told him that he had “crossed the about, line” and should stop having non-work related conversations with her, the conduct was clearly unwelcome. Harvard Prompt. [89] Even unwelcome religiously motivated conduct is not unlawful unless “the victim . . . subjectively perceive[s] the on the criminal, environment to be abusive” and the conduct is “severe or pervasive enough to harvard university essay create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment -- an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive.” [90] Whether a reasonable person would perceive the conduct as abusive turns on common sense and usc emba essays, context, looking at harvard, the totality of the about business, circumstances. [91] Relevant factors include whether the conduct was abusive, derogatory, or offensive; [92] whether the conduct was frequent; [93] and whether the harvard university essay, conduct was humiliating or physically threatening. Offshore Essay. [94]

Reasonable Person Perceives Conduct To Be Hostile. Although he hired employees of all religions, the Director of “Get Drug Free Today” required employees to harvard university sign a statement that they would support the values of the Church of Scientology. He regularly chastised those whose conduct did not conform to about business those values. A reasonable person would perceive this to be a religiously hostile work environment. [95] To “alter the conditions of employment,” conduct need not cause economic or psychological harm. [96] It need not impair work performance, discourage employees from remaining on the job, or impede their advancement. [97] The presence of one or more of those factors would buttress the claim, but is harvard application prompt, not required. [98] However, Title VII is not a general civility code, and does not render all insensitive or offensive comments, petty slights, and annoyances illegal. [99] Offhand or isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to the level of illegality. Essays Plans. [100] Insensitive Comments Not Enough To Constitute Hostile Environment. Marvin is an Orthodox Jew who was hired as a radio show host. When he started work, a co-worker, Stacy, pointed to his yarmulke and asked, “Will your headset fit over that?” On a few occasions, Stacy, made other remarks about the harvard prompt, yarmulke, such as: “Nice hat. Is that a beanie?” and “Do they come in different colors?” Although the co-worker’s comments about his yarmulke were insensitive, they were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment for Marvin. [101] Isolated Comments Not Enough to Constitute Hostile Environment.

Bob, a supervisor, occasionally allowed spontaneous and voluntary prayers by employees during office meetings. During one meeting, he referenced Bible passages related to usc emba essays “slothfulness” and “work ethics.” Amy complained that Bob’s comments and the few instances of allowing voluntary prayers during office meetings created a hostile environment. The comments do not create an actionable harassment claim. They were not severe, and because they occurred infrequently, they were not sufficiently pervasive to state a claim. [102] The severity and university application essay prompt, pervasiveness factors operate inversely. The more severe the harassment, the less frequently the essays about business plans, incidents need to recur. University Application. At the same time, incidents that may not, individually, be severe may become unlawful if they occur frequently or in close proximity. [103] Although a single incident will seldom create an gcse resistance unlawfully hostile environment, it may do so if it is unusually severe, particularly if it involves physical threat. [104] One Instance of Physically Threatening Conduct Is Enough to Constitute Hostile Environment. Ihsaan is a Muslim.

Shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Ihsaan came to work and found the words “You terrorists go back where you came from! We will avenge the victims!! Your life is next!” scrawled in red marker on his office door. Because of the timing of the statement and the direct physical threat, this incident, alone, is sufficiently severe to constitute hostile environment harassment based on religion and national origin. [105] Persistent Offensive Remarks Constitute Hostile Environment. Betty is a Mormon. During a disagreement regarding a joint project, a co-worker, Julian, tells Betty that she doesn’t know what she is talking about and that she should “go back to Salt Lake City.” When Betty subsequently proposes a different approach to the project, Julian tells her that her suggestions are as “flaky” as he would expect from “her kind.” When Betty tries to resolve the harvard university essay, conflict, Julian tells her that if she is essay school, uncomfortable working with him, she can either ask to be transferred, or she can “just pray about it.” Over the next six months, Julian regularly makes similar negative references to university application Betty’s religion. His persistent offensive remarks create a hostile environment. Religious expression that is repeatedly directed at an employee can become severe or pervasive, whether or not the content is intended to white sox fatherhood essay be insulting or abusive. Thus, for example, persistently reiterating atheist views to a religious employee who has asked that it stop can create a hostile environment. However, the extent to which the expression is directed at a particular employee is harvard application essay, relevant to determining whether or when it could reasonably be perceived to gcse physics resistance wire be severe or pervasive by that employee. [106] For example, although it is conceivable that one employee may allege that he is harvard prompt, offended by a colleague’s wearing of religious garb, expressing one’s religion by wearing religious garb is not religious harassment.

It merely expresses an business plans individual’s religious affiliation and does not demean other religious views. As such, it is not objectively hostile. University Application Essay. Nor is it directed at any particular individual. Oil Drilling Essay. Similarly, workplace displays of university application prompt, religious artifacts or posters that do not demean other religious views generally would not constitute religious harassment. No Hostile Environment from Comments That Are Not Abusive and Not Directed at Complaining Employee. While eating lunch in physics the company cafeteria, Clarence often overhears conversations between his co-workers Dharma and Khema. University Application Essay Prompt. Dharma, a Buddhist, is discussing meditation techniques with Khema, who is interested in Buddhism. Clarence strongly believes that meditation is an occult practice that leads to devil worship and white essay, complains to their supervisor that Dharma and university essay prompt, Khema are creating a hostile environment for usc emba essays him.

Such conversations do not constitute severe or pervasive religious harassment of Clarence because they do not insult other religions and they were not directed at university, him. Overview: An employer is always liable for a supervisor’s harassment if it results in a tangible employment action. However, if it does not, the employer may be able to gcse physics wire avoid liability or limit damages by establishing an affirmative defense that includes two necessary elements: (a) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any harassing behavior, and (b) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to avoid harm otherwise. In cases of harassment by a co-worker or a third party over whom the employer had some control, an employer is liable if it knew or should have known about the harvard application, harassment and failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. 1. Harassment by essays about plans Supervisors or Managers. Employers are automatically liable for supervisory harassment that results in harvard university essay prompt a tangible employment action such as a denial of promotion, demotion, discharge, or constructive discharge. If the harassment does not result in white a tangible employment action, the employer can attempt to prove, as an affirmative defense to liability, that: (1) the harvard application essay, employer exercised reasonable care to resistance wire prevent and promptly correct any harassing behavior, and (2) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to otherwise avoid harm. [107] Supervisory Harassment with Tangible Employment Action. George, a high level official in a state agency, is an harvard essay atheist who has frequently been heard to white say that he thinks anyone who is deeply religious is a zealot with his own agenda and cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of the public.

George particularly ridicules Debra, a devoutly observant Jehovah’s Witness, and consistently withholds the most desirable assignments from her. He denies her request for university application a promotion to a more prestigious job in another division, saying that he can’t let her “spread that religious poppycock any further.” Debra files a religious harassment charge. Business. Respondent asserts in harvard its position statement that it is not liable because Debra never made a complaint under its internal anti-harassment policy and complaint procedures. Because the harassment culminated in a tangible employment action (failure to promote), the employer is liable for the harassment even if it has an effective anti-harassment policy, and even if Debra never complained. Additionally, the denial of promotion would be actionable as disparate treatment based on essays about religion. Supervisory Harassment Without Tangible Employment Action. Jennifer’s employer, XYZ, had an anti-harassment policy and complaint procedure that covered religious harassment.

All employees were aware of it, because XYZ widely and regularly publicized it. Despite his knowledge of the policy, Jennifer’s supervisor frequently mocked her religious beliefs. When Jennifer told him that his comments bothered her, he told her that he was just kidding and she should not take everything so seriously. Jennifer never reported the problem. When one of Jennifer’s co-workers eventually reported the university, supervisor’s harassing conduct, the employer promptly investigated, and acted effectively to stop the supervisor’s conduct. Jennifer then filed a religious harassment charge. Because the harassment of Jennifer did not culminate in a tangible employment action, XYZ may assert as an affirmative defense that it is not liable because Jennifer failed to make a complaint under its internal anti-harassment policy and complaint procedures. On these facts, XYZ will not be liable for the harassment because Jennifer unreasonably failed to utilize XYZ’s available, effective complaint mechanisms, and because XYZ took prompt and reasonable corrective measures once it did learn of the harassment. An employer is liable for harassment by co-workers where it: knew or should have known about the harassment, and failed to offshore essay take prompt and appropriate corrective action. [108] Harassment by Co-Workers.

John, who is a Christian Scientist, shares an office with Rick, a Mormon. Rick repeatedly tells John that he is practicing a false religion, and that he should study Mormon literature. Despite John’s protestations that he is very happy with his religion and has no desire to convert, Rick regularly leaves religious pamphlets on John’s desk and tries to talk to application him about religion. After vainly asking Rick to stop the behavior, John complains to their immediate supervisor, who dismisses John’s complaint on white sox fatherhood the ground that Rick is a nice person who believes that he is university application essay prompt, just being helpful. If the harassment continues, the employer is liable because it knew, through the white sox fatherhood, supervisor, about Rick’s harassing conduct but failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. [109] An employer is liable for harassment by non-employees where it: knew or should have known about the harassment, could control the harasser’s conduct or otherwise protect the employee, and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action. [110] Harassment by a Contractor. Tristan works for XYZ, a contractor that manages Crossroads Corporation’s mail room. When Tristan delivers the mail to Julia, the Crossroads receptionist, he gives her religious tracts, attempts to convert her to his religion, and persists even after she tells him to stop. Julia reports Tristan’s conduct to application her supervisor, who tells her that he cannot do anything because Tristan does not work for oil drilling essay Crossroads. If the harassment continues, the supervisor’s failure to act will subject Crossroads to application prompt liability because Tristan’s conduct is pervasive and Crossroads refused to take preventive action within its control.

Options available to Julia’s supervisor or the appropriate individual in about plans the supervisor’s chain of command might include initiating a meeting with Tristan and harvard application essay prompt, XYZ management regarding the harassment and demanding that it cease, that appropriate disciplinary action be taken if it continues, and/or that a different mail carrier be assigned to essay criminal Julia’s route. C. Special Considerations for Employers When Balancing Anti-Harassment and harvard application essay, Accommodation Obligations With Respect to Religious Expression. While some employees believe that religion is intensely personal and private, others are open about their religion. [111] There are employees who may believe that they have a religious obligation to essay for high seniors share their views and to try to persuade co-workers of the truth of their religious beliefs, i.e. , to proselytize. Some employers, too, may wish to express their religious views and share their religion with their employees. [112] As noted above, however, some employees may perceive proselytizing or other religious expression as unwelcome harassment based on harvard university application prompt their own religious beliefs and observances, or lack thereof. This mix of divergent beliefs and practices can give rise to physics coursework wire conflicts requiring employers to balance the rights of employees who wish to express their religious beliefs with the rights of other employees to be free from religious harassment under the foregoing Title VII harassment standards. [113] As discussed in more detail in § IV-C-6 of this document, an employer never has to accommodate expression of a religious belief in the workplace where such an accommodation could potentially constitute harassment of harvard university, co-workers, because that would pose an undue hardship for usc emba essays the employer. Therefore, while Title VII requires employers to accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious belief in engaging in religious expression ( e.g. , proselytizing) in harvard application essay the workplace, an employer does not have to allow such expression if it imposes an undue hardship on the operation of the business. For example, it would be an undue hardship for an employer to prompts for high accommodate proselytizing by an employee if it constituted potentially unlawful religious harassment of a co-worker who found it unwelcome, or if it otherwise interfered with the operation of the business. [114] Because employers are responsible for maintaining a nondiscriminatory work environment, they are liable for harvard university essay prompt perpetrating or tolerating religious harassment of their employees. Gcse Coursework Resistance. An employer can reduce the harvard prompt, chance that employees will engage in conduct that rises to the level of unlawful harassment by implementing an anti-harassment policy and an effective procedure for reporting, investigating, and correcting harassing conduct. Plans. [115] Even if the policy does not prevent all such conduct, it will likely limit the employer’s liability where the affected employee allows the conduct to rise to harvard university prompt the level of illegality by white sox fatherhood failing to harvard essay prompt report it. Sox Fatherhood Essay. However, Title VII violations may result if an employer tries to harvard university avoid potential co-worker objections to employee religious expression by preemptively banning all religious communications in the workplace, since Title VII requires that employees’ sincerely held religious practices and beliefs be accommodated as long as no undue hardship is posed.

Employers should have a well-publicized and sox fatherhood essay, consistently applied anti-harassment policy that: (1) covers religious harassment; (2) clearly explains what is university essay, prohibited; (3) describes procedures for bringing harassment to usc emba essays management’s attention; and, (4) contains an application essay assurance that complainants will be protected against school, retaliation. The procedures should include a complaint mechanism that includes multiple avenues for harvard university application essay complaint; prompt, thorough, and impartial investigations; and prompt and appropriate corrective action. Employers should allow religious expression among employees to the same extent that they allow other types of personal expression that are not harassing or disruptive. Once an employer is on notice that an employee objects to religious conduct that is directed at on the criminal, him or her, the employer should take steps to end the conduct because even conduct that the employer does not regard as abusive can become sufficiently severe or pervasive to affect the conditions of employment if allowed to persist in the face of the employee’s objection. If harassment is harvard application prompt, perpetrated by a non-employee assigned by a contractor, the supervisor or other appropriate individual in the chain of command should initiate a meeting with the contractor regarding the essays about, harassment and demand that it cease, that appropriate disciplinary action be taken if it continues, and/or that a different individual be assigned by the contractor.

To prevent conflicts from harvard escalating to the level of a Title VII violation, employers should immediately intervene when they become aware of objectively abusive or insulting conduct, even absent a complaint. Physics. Employers should encourage managers to intervene proactively and harvard university application essay prompt, discuss with subordinates whether particular religious expression is welcome if the manager believes the expression might be construed as harassing to offshore oil drilling essay a reasonable person. While supervisors are permitted to engage in certain religious expression, they should avoid expression that might due to their supervisory authority reasonably be perceived by harvard university prompt subordinates as coercive, even when not so intended. Employees who are the essays about plans, recipients of unwelcome religious conduct should inform the individual engaging in the conduct that they wish it to stop. If the conduct does not stop, employees should report it to their supervisor or other appropriate company official in accordance with the procedures established in the company’s anti-harassment policy. Harvard University Essay Prompt. Employees who do not wish to personally confront an criminal individual who is directing unwelcome religious or anti-religious conduct towards them should report the conduct to their supervisor or other appropriate company official in accordance with the company’s anti-harassment policy. Overview: Title VII requires an employer, once on notice, to reasonably accommodate an harvard application essay prompt employee whose sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance conflicts with a work requirement, unless providing the accommodation would create an undue hardship. Sox Fatherhood Essay. [116] However, the Title VII “undue hardship” defense is defined very differently than the harvard university, “undue hardship” defense for disability accommodation under the usc emba essays, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Under Title VII, the harvard prompt, undue hardship defense to usc emba essays providing religious accommodation requires a showing that the proposed accommodation in a particular case poses a “more than de minimis” cost or burden, which is a far lower standard for an employer to meet than undue hardship under the ADA, which is harvard university essay, defined in that statute as “significant difficulty or expense.” [117] A religious accommodation claim is essays, distinct from a disparate treatment claim, in which the question is essay, whether employees are treated equally. Oil Drilling. An individual alleging denial of religious accommodation is seeking an adjustment to a neutral work rule that infringes on harvard prompt the employee’s ability to practice his religion. The accommodation requirement is “plainly intended to relieve individuals of the burden of choosing between their jobs and their religious convictions, where such relief will not unduly burden others.” [118]

A reasonable religious accommodation is any adjustment to the work environment that will allow the white, employee to harvard essay comply with his or her religious beliefs. However, it is subject to the limit of more than de minimis cost or burden. The need for white religious accommodation most frequently arises where an individual’s religious beliefs, observances, or practices conflict with a specific task or requirement of the job or the application process. The employer’s duty to accommodate will usually entail making a special exception from, or adjustment to, the particular requirement so that the employee or applicant will be able to practice his or her religion. Accommodation requests often relate to work schedules, dress and harvard essay, grooming, or religious expression or practice while at work. 1. Notice of the Conflict Between Religion and Work.

An applicant or employee who seeks religious accommodation must make the employer aware both of the need for accommodation and that it is being requested due to a conflict between religion and essay justice, work. Harvard Application Essay. The employee is obligated to explain the religious nature of the belief or practice at issue, and cannot assume that the employer will already know or understand it. [119] Similarly, the employer should not assume that a request is invalid simply because it is based on religious beliefs or practices with which the employer is unfamiliar, but should ask the employee to explain the religious nature of the practice and the way in which it conflicts with a work requirement. No “magic words” are required to place an employer on notice of an applicant’s or employee’s conflict between religious needs and a work requirement. Essay Criminal Justice. To request an accommodation, an individual may use plain language and need not mention any particular terms such as “Title VII” or “religious accommodation.” However, the applicant or employee must provide enough information to harvard university make the employer aware that there exists a conflict between the individual’s religious practice or belief and a requirement for usc emba essays applying for or performing the harvard application essay, job. [120] Failure to Advise Employer That Request Is Due to Religious Practice or Belief. Jim agreed to take his employer’s drug test but was terminated because he refused to sign the accompanying consent form.

After his termination, Jim filed a charge alleging that the employer failed to accommodate his religious objection to swearing an essay school oath. Until it received notice of the charge, the harvard university application essay, employer did not know that Jim’s refusal to coursework sign the form was based on his religious beliefs. Because the employer was not notified of the conflict at university application prompt, the time Jim refused to sign the form, or at any time prior to Jim’s termination, it did not have an white sox fatherhood opportunity to offer to accommodate him. The employer has not violated Title VII. [121] While an employer is not required by harvard essay Title VII to conduct a discussion with an employee before denying the employee’s accommodation request, as a practical matter it can be important to do so. Both the employer and the employee have roles to play in resolving an accommodation request. In addition to placing the employer on notice of the need for accommodation, the employee should cooperate with the employer’s efforts to determine whether a reasonable accommodation can be granted.

Once the employer becomes aware of the employee’s religious conflict, the essay criminal justice, employer should obtain promptly whatever additional information is needed to determine whether an accommodation is available that would eliminate the religious conflict without posing an harvard undue hardship on the operation of the employer’s business. [122] This typically involves the employer and employee mutually sharing information necessary to process the accommodation request. Employer?employee cooperation and flexibility are key to the search for justice a reasonable accommodation. If the accommodation solution is not immediately apparent, the employer should discuss the request with the employee to determine what accommodations might be effective. If the employer requests additional information reasonably needed to university application essay evaluate the request, the employee should provide it. Failure to confer with the essays business, employee is not an independent violation of harvard essay prompt, Title VII but, as a practical matter, such failure can have adverse legal consequences for both an employee and an employer. About Business. For example, in harvard application some cases where an employer has made no effort to act on an accommodation request, courts have found that the employer lacked the evidence needed to meet its burden of proof to for high seniors establish that the plaintiff’s proposed accommodation would actually have posed an undue hardship. Essay Prompt. [123] Likewise, courts have ruled against employees who refused to cooperate with an employer’s requests for reasonable information when, as a result, the essays business plans, employer was deprived of the information necessary to resolve the accommodation request. Harvard Application Essay. For example, if an employee requested a schedule change to gcse resistance accommodate daily prayers, the university prompt, employer might need to about business plans ask for information about the religious observance, such as time and duration of the daily prayers, in order to determine if accommodation can be granted without posing an undue hardship on the operation of the employer’s business. [124] Moreover, even if the employer does not grant the harvard university application, employee’s preferred accommodation but instead provides an alternative accommodation, the employee must cooperate by essay prompts school seniors attempting to application meet his religious needs through the employer’s proposed accommodation if possible. [125] Where the usc emba essays, accommodation request itself does not provide enough information to enable the employer to make a determination, and the employer has a bona fide doubt as to the basis for the accommodation request, it is entitled to make a limited inquiry into the facts and circumstances of the harvard university application essay, employee’s claim that the belief or practice at gcse coursework resistance, issue is religious and sincerely held, and that the belief or practice gives rise to the need for the accommodation. See “Sincerely Held” and “Employer Inquiries into Religious Nature or Sincerity of Belief,” supra §§ I-A-2 and I-A-3. [126] Whether an employer has a reasonable basis for seeking to verify the harvard application essay, employee’s stated beliefs will depend on the facts of essay, a particular case.

Sincerity of Religious Belief Questioned. Bob, who had been a dues-paying member of the CDF union for fourteen years, had a work-related dispute with a union official and one week later asserted that union activities were contrary to his religion and harvard application essay prompt, that he could no longer pay union dues. The union doubted whether Bob’s request was based on a sincerely held religious belief, given that it appeared to be precipitated by an unrelated dispute with the union, and he had not sought this accommodation in his prior fourteen years of employment. In this situation, the union can require him to wire provide additional information to support his assertion that he sincerely holds a religious conviction that precludes him from belonging to or financially supporting a union. [127] When an employer requests additional information, employees should provide information that addresses the employer’s reasonable doubts. That information need not, however, take any specific form. For example, written materials or the employee’s own first-hand explanation may be sufficient to alleviate the employer’s doubts about the sincerity or religious nature of the employee’s professed belief such that third-party verification is unnecessary. Further, since idiosyncratic beliefs can be sincerely held and religious, even when third-party verification is needed, it does not have to harvard come from usc emba essays a church official or member, but rather could be provided by others who are aware of the employee’s religious practice or belief. [128] An employee who fails to prompt cooperate with an employer’s reasonable request for verification of the sincerity or religious nature of a professed belief risks losing any subsequent claim that the employer improperly denied an accommodation. Usc Emba Essays. By the harvard prompt, same token, employers who unreasonably request unnecessary or excessive corroborating evidence risk being held liable for denying a reasonable accommodation request, and having their actions challenged as retaliatory or as part of a pattern of harassment.

It also is important to white remember that even if an employer concludes that an individual’s professed belief is sincerely held and religious, it is only required to harvard prompt grant those requests for accommodation that do not pose an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. Clarifying a Request. Diane requests that her employer schedule her for oil drilling “fewer hours” so that she can “attend church more frequently.” The employer denies the request because it is not clear what schedule Diane is requesting or whether the change is sought due to a religious belief or practice. While Diane’s request lacked sufficient detail for the employer to make a final decision, it was sufficient to constitute a religious accommodation request. Rather than denying the essay, request outright, the employer should have obtained the information from Diane that it needed to make a decision. The employer could have inquired of Diane precisely what schedule change was sought and for what purpose, and how her current schedule conflicted with her religious practices or beliefs. Diane would then have had an obligation to prompts provide sufficient information to permit her employer to make a reasonable assessment of whether her request was based on a sincerely held religious belief, the precise conflict that existed between her work schedule and university application prompt, church schedule, and whether granting the accommodation would pose more than a de minimis burden on the employer’s business. 3. Essay Prompts For High. What is a “Reasonable” Accommodation?

Although an university application employer never has to provide an accommodation that would pose an essay on the justice undue hardship, see infra § IV-B, the accommodation that is provided must be a reasonable one. An accommodation is not “reasonable” if it merely lessens rather than eliminates the conflict between religion and work, provided eliminating the conflict would not impose an harvard application undue hardship. Essays Plans. [129] Eliminating the conflict between a work rule and an employee’s religious belief, practice, or observance means accommodating the employee without unnecessarily disadvantaging the employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of essay prompt, employment. Essays About Business. [130] Where there is more than one reasonable accommodation that would not pose an undue hardship, the employer is harvard university, not obliged to usc emba essays provide the harvard application, accommodation preferred by the employee. [131] However, an employer’s proposed accommodation will not be “reasonable” if a more favorable accommodation is essay on the, provided to other employees for non-religious purposes, [132] or, for example, if it requires the employee to accept a reduction in pay rate or some other loss of harvard essay, a benefit or privilege of employment and there is an offshore oil drilling essay alternative accommodation that does not do so. [133] Ultimately, reasonableness is a fact-specific determination. “The reasonableness of an application employer’s attempt at accommodation cannot be determined in a vacuum. Instead, it must be determined on a case?by?case basis; what may be a reasonable accommodation for one employee may not be reasonable for another . . . . Usc Emba Essays. ‘The term ‘reasonable accommodation’ is a relative term and cannot be given a hard and fast meaning; each case . . . necessarily depends upon its own facts and circumstances, and essay prompt, comes down to essay on the criminal a determination of ‘reasonableness’ under the unique circumstances of the individual employer-employee relationship.’” [134] Employer Violates Title VII if it Offers Only Partial Accommodation Where Full Accommodation Would Not Pose an Undue Hardship. Rachel, who worked as a ticket agent at a sports arena, asked not to be scheduled for any Friday night or Saturday shifts, to university application essay permit her to observe the Jewish Sabbath from sunset on seniors Friday through sunset on Saturday. The arena wanted to give Rachel only every other Saturday off.

The arena’s proposed accommodation is not reasonable because it does not fully eliminate the religious conflict. Harvard Essay Prompt. The arena may deny the accommodation request only about plans, if giving Rachel every Saturday off poses an undue hardship for the arena. [135] Employer Not Obligated To Provide Employee’s Preferred Accommodation. Tina, a newly hired part-time store cashier whose sincerely held religious belief is that she should refrain from work on Sunday as part of her Sabbath observance, asked her supervisor never to university application essay prompt schedule her to work on Sundays. Tina specifically asked to be scheduled to essays business plans work Saturdays instead. In response, her employer offered to allow her to work on Thursday, which she found inconvenient because she takes a college class on that day. Even if Tina preferred a different schedule, the employer is not required to grant Tina’s preferred accommodation. [136] Accommodation By Transfer Where Accommodation in Current Position Would Pose Undue Hardship. Yvonne, a member of the Pentecostal faith, was employed as a nurse at a hospital.

When she was assigned to harvard application essay the Labor and Delivery Unit, she advised the nurse manager that her faith forbids her from participating “directly or indirectly in ending a life,” and that this proscription prevents her from essays about business plans assisting with abortions. She asked the hospital to accommodate her religious beliefs by allowing her to trade assignments with other nurses in the Labor and Delivery Unit as needed. University Essay Prompt. The hospital concluded that it could not accommodate Yvonne within the Labor and Delivery Unit because there were not enough staff members able and willing to trade with her. The hospital instead offered to permit Yvonne to transfer, without a reduction in essay prompts seniors pay or benefits, to a vacant nursing position in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit, which did not perform any such procedures. The hospital’s solution complies with Title VII. The hospital is not required to grant Yvonne’s preferred accommodation where it has offered a reasonable alternative solution that eliminates the conflict between work and a religious practice or belief under its existing policies and procedures. [137] If there had been no other position to which she could transfer, the employer would have been entitled to terminate her since it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate her in the Labor and Delivery Unit. Title VII is violated by an employer’s failure to accommodate even if to avoid adverse consequences an employee continues to work after his accommodation request is denied. “An employee does not cease to be discriminated against because he temporarily gives up his religious practice and submits to the employment policy.” [138] Thus, the fact that an employee acquiesces to the employer’s work rule, continuing to work without an accommodation after the employer has denied the harvard application prompt, request, should not defeat the employee’s legal claim. [139] In addition, the obligation to provide reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship is a continuing obligation. Employers should be aware that an employee’s religious beliefs and practices may evolve over time, and that this may result in requests for additional or different accommodations. [140] Similarly, the employer has the school, right to university application prompt discontinue a previously granted accommodation that is no longer utilized for religious purposes or poses an essays about business undue hardship. An employer can refuse to provide a reasonable accommodation if it would pose an undue hardship. Undue hardship may be shown if the accommodation would impose “more than de minimis cost” on the operation of the employer’s business. [141] The concept of “more than de minimis cost” is discussed below in sub-section 2. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. Although the employer’s showing of undue hardship under Title VII is easier than under the ADA, the burden of persuasion is still on on the the employer. [142] If an employee’s proposed accommodation would pose an undue hardship, the employer should explore alternative accommodations.

The determination of whether a particular proposed accommodation imposes an university prompt undue hardship “must be made by considering the particular factual context of each case.” [143] Relevant factors may include the essay for high, type of workplace, the nature of the employee’s duties, the identifiable cost of the accommodation in relation to the size and operating costs of the employer, and the number of employees who will in fact need a particular accommodation. [144] For example, an employer with multiple facilities might be better able than another employer to accommodate a Muslim employee who seeks a transfer to a location with a nearby mosque that he can attend during his lunch break. To prove undue hardship, the employer will need to demonstrate how much cost or disruption the employee’s proposed accommodation would involve. [145] An employer cannot rely on potential or hypothetical hardship when faced with a religious obligation that conflicts with scheduled work, but rather should rely on objective information. [146] A mere assumption that many more people with the harvard application essay prompt, same religious practices as the oil drilling essay, individual being accommodated may also seek accommodation is not evidence of undue hardship. The determination of whether a proposed accommodation would pose an undue hardship is based on concrete, fact-specific considerations. [147] To establish undue hardship, the employer must demonstrate that the accommodation would require more than de minimis cost. [148] Factors to be considered are “the identifiable cost in relation to the size and operating costs of the employer, and the number of individuals who will in fact need a particular accommodation.” [149] Generally, the payment of administrative costs necessary for an accommodation, such as costs associated with rearranging schedules and recording substitutions for payroll purposes or infrequent or temporary payment of harvard university application essay prompt, premium wages ( e.g. , overtime rates) while a more permanent accommodation is sought, will not constitute more than de minimis cost, whereas the prompts school seniors, regular payment of premium wages or the hiring of additional employees to provide an accommodation will generally cause an undue hardship to the employer. [150] “[T]he Commission will presume that the infrequent payment of premium wages for a substitute or the payment of premium wages while a more permanent accommodation is being sought are costs which an employer can be required to bear as a means of providing reasonable accommodation.” [151] Costs to be considered include not only essay prompt, direct monetary costs but also the burden on the conduct of the employer’s business. For example, courts have found undue hardship where the accommodation diminishes efficiency in other jobs, [152] infringes on other employees’ job rights or benefits, [153] impairs workplace safety, or causes co-workers to about business plans carry the university essay, accommodated employee’s share of potentially hazardous or burdensome work. On The Criminal Justice. [154] Whether the proposed accommodation conflicts with another law will also be considered. [155] Religious Need Can Be Accommodated. David wears long hair pursuant to his Native American religious beliefs.

David applies for a job as a server at a restaurant which requires its male employees to harvard university application wear their hair “short and offshore oil drilling, neat.” When the restaurant manager informs David that if offered the position he will have to cut his hair, David explains that he keeps his hair long based on his religious beliefs, and offers to wear it in a pony tail or held up with a clip. The manager refuses this accommodation, and denies David the application essay prompt, position based on his long hair. Since the evidence indicated that David could have been accommodated, without undue hardship, by wearing his hair in a ponytail or held up with a clip, the gcse wire, employer will be liable for denial of reasonable accommodation and harvard university application prompt, discriminatory failure to hire. Safety Risk Poses Undue Hardship. Patricia alleges she was terminated from her job as a steel mill laborer because of for high, her religion (Pentecostal) after she notified her supervisor that her faith prohibits her from essay prompt wearing pants, as required by the mill’s dress code, and requested as an criminal justice accommodation to university application essay prompt be permitted to wear a skirt. Management contends that the dress code is essential to essays about plans the safe and efficient operation of the mill, and has evidence that it was imposed following several accidents in which skirts worn by employees were caught in the same type of mill machinery that Patricia operates. Because the evidence establishes that wearing pants is harvard university application essay prompt, truly necessary for essay for high school seniors safety reasons, the accommodation requested by harvard university essay prompt Patricia poses an undue hardship. [156]

3. Seniority Systems and Collectively Bargained Rights. A proposed religious accommodation poses an undue hardship if it would deprive another employee of offshore oil drilling, a job preference or other benefit guaranteed by a bona fide seniority system or collective bargaining agreement (CBA). [157] Of course, the mere existence of a seniority system or CBA does not relieve the university essay, employer of the duty to attempt reasonable accommodation of its employees’ religious practices; the question is whether an accommodation can be provided without violating the seniority system or CBA. [158] Allowing voluntary substitutes and essay on the justice, swaps does not constitute an undue hardship to the extent the arrangements do not violate a bona fide seniority system or CBA. [159] Schedules Based on university application essay prompt a Seniority System or Collectively Bargained Rights. Susan, an employee of QRS Corp., asks not to essay work on her Sabbath. QRS and its employees’ union have negotiated a CBA which provides that weekend shifts will rotate evenly among employees. If Susan can find qualified co-workers voluntarily willing to swap shifts to application essay accommodate her sincerely held religious beliefs, the employer could be found liable for denial of reasonable accommodation if it refuses to permit the gcse coursework resistance, swap to occur. The existence of the harvard university application essay, collectively bargained system for determining weekend shifts should not result in the denial of white, accommodation if a voluntary swap can be arranged by the employee without violating the system or otherwise posing an undue hardship.

The result would be the harvard university, same if QRS had a unilaterally imposed seniority system (rather than a CBA) pursuant to which weekend shifts are determined. However, if other employees were unwilling to swap shifts or were otherwise harmed by not requiring Susan to work on the shift in question, or the employer would be subject to other operational costs that were more than de minimis by usc emba essays allowing Susan to swap shifts, then the harvard application, employer can demonstrate undue hardship. [160] Although infringing on co-workers’ ability to perform their duties [161] or subjecting co-workers to a hostile work environment will generally constitute undue hardship, [162] the general disgruntlement, resentment, or jealousy of sox fatherhood, co-workers will not. [163] Undue hardship requires more than proof that some co-workers complained; a showing of undue hardship based on co-worker interests generally requires evidence that the accommodation would actually infringe on the rights of co-workers or cause disruption of work. University Essay. [164] See also §§ III-C and IV-C-6 (discussing specifically complaints regarding proselytizing and essays about plans, other forms of religious expression), infra . If a religious practice actually conflicts with a legally mandated federal, state, or local security requirement, an employer need not accommodate the practice because doing so would create an undue hardship. If a security requirement has been unilaterally imposed by the employer and is not required by law or regulation, the employer will need to decide whether it would be an undue hardship to modify or eliminate the requirement to accommodate an employee who has a religious conflict. Accommodation Implicating Security Concerns. Patrick is employed as a correctional officer at a state prison, and his brother William is employed as a grocery store manager. Both Patrick and William seek permission from their respective employers to wear a fez at harvard university essay, work as an act of faith on a particular holy day as part of white essay, their religious expression. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. Both employers deny the business plans, request, citing a uniformly applied workplace policy prohibiting employees from wearing any type of head covering. The prison’s policy is based on security concerns that head coverings may be used to conceal drugs, weapons, or other contraband, and may spark internal violence among prisoners.

The grocery store’s policy is based on a stated desire that all employees wear uniform clothing so that they can be readily identified by customers. If both brothers file EEOC charges challenging the denial of university essay, their accommodation requests, Patrick will likely not prevail because the prison’s denial of his request was based on essay on the justice legitimate security considerations posed by the particular religious garb sought to application essay be worn. Usc Emba Essays. William will likely prevail because there is no indication it would pose an undue hardship for the grocery store to modify its policy with respect to his request. [165] Harvinder, a baptized Sikh who works in a hospital, wears a small (4-inch), dull and sheathed kirpan (miniature sword) strapped and hidden underneath her clothing, as a symbol of her religious commitment to defend truth and moral values. When Harvinder’s supervisor, Bill, learned about her kirpan from a co-worker, he instructed Harvinder not to wear it at university essay prompt, work because it violated the hospital policy against weapons in the workplace. Gcse Physics Resistance. Harvinder explained to harvard university essay prompt Bill that her faith requires her to wear a kirpan in essays about order to comply with the Sikh Code of Conduct, and gave him literature explaining that the kirpan is a religious artifact, not a weapon. Application Prompt. She also showed him the usc emba essays, kirpan, allowing him to see that it was no sharper than butter knives found in the hospital cafeteria. Nevertheless, Bill told her that she would be terminated if she continued to wear the kirpan at work. Absent any evidence that allowing Harvinder to wear the harvard university application essay prompt, kirpan would pose an undue hardship in the factual circumstances of this case, the hospital is liable for denial of accommodation. [166] C. Justice. Common Methods of harvard application essay prompt, Accommodation in the Workplace. Under Title VII, an physics coursework wire employer or other covered entity may use a variety of methods to provide reasonable accommodations to harvard essay its employees.

The most common methods are: (1) flexible scheduling; (2) voluntary substitutes or swaps of shifts and assignments; (3) lateral transfer and/or change of job assignment; and, (4) modifying workplace practices, policies, and/or procedures. An employer may be able to plans reasonably accommodate an employee by allowing flexible arrival and departure times, floating or optional holidays, flexible work breaks, use of lunch time in exchange for early departure, staggered work hours, and other means to enable an harvard university employee to business make up time lost due to the observance of religious practices. [167] However, EEOC’s position is that it will be insufficient merely to eliminate part of the conflict, unless eliminating the conflict in harvard application its entirety will pose an undue hardship by disrupting business operations or impinging on other employees’ benefits or settled expectations. Break Schedules/Prayer at Work. Rashid, a janitor, tells his employer on his first day of work that he practices Islam and will need to seniors pray at harvard application essay, several prescribed times during the workday in order to adhere to his religious practice of praying at five specified times each day, for several minutes, with hand washing beforehand. The employer objects because its written policy allows one fifteen-minute break in the middle of each morning and afternoon.

Rashid’s requested change in break schedule will not exceed the business plans, 30 minutes of total break time otherwise allotted, nor will it affect his ability to harvard university application prompt perform his duties or otherwise cause an undue hardship for his employer. Thus, Rashid is entitled to accommodation. White Sox Fatherhood Essay. [168] Blanket Policies Prohibiting Time Off for Religious Observance. A large employer operating a fleet of buses had a policy of refusing to accept driver applications unless the applicant agreed that he or she was available to be scheduled to work any shift, seven days a week. This policy violates Title VII to university the extent that it discriminates against essays about, applicants who refrain from work on certain days for religious reasons, by failing to allow for the provision of religious accommodation absent undue hardship. [169] 2. Harvard Essay. Voluntary Substitutes and Shift Swaps. Although it would pose an offshore oil drilling essay undue hardship to require employees involuntarily to substitute for one another or swap shifts, the university application essay prompt, reasonable accommodation requirement can often be satisfied without undue hardship where a volunteer with substantially similar qualifications is available, either for a single absence or an extended period of essay, time. The employer’s obligation is to make a good faith effort to allow voluntary substitutions and shift swaps, under circumstances which do not discourage employees from application essay prompt substituting for one another or trading shifts to offshore oil drilling accommodate a religious conflict. University. [170] However, if the essay on the criminal justice, employer is on notice that the employee’s religious beliefs preclude him not only from working on his Sabbath but also from inducing others to do so, reasonable accommodation requires more than merely permitting the employee to swap. [171] Nevertheless, an employer does not have to permit a substitute or swap if it would pose more than de minimis cost or burden to business operations. As noted above, if a swap or substitution would result in the employer having to pay premium wages (such as overtime pay), the frequency of the arrangement will be relevant to determining if it poses an undue hardship; “the Commission will presume that the infrequent payment of premium wages for university essay a substitute or the sox fatherhood essay, payment of premium wages while a more permanent accommodation is being sought are costs which an employer can be required to bear as a means of providing reasonable accommodation.” [172] An employer may have to make an exception to its scheduling policies, procedures, or practices in order to grant religious accommodation. [173] For example, if it does not pose an undue hardship, an employer must make an exception to its policy of requiring all employees, regardless of seniority, to work an “equal number of weekend, holiday, and night shifts,” and harvard university essay, instead permit voluntary shift swaps between qualified co-workers in gcse physics resistance order to accommodate a particular employee’s sincerely held religious belief that he should not work on the Sabbath. Of course, if allowing a swap or other accommodation would not provide the coverage the employer needs for its business operations or otherwise pose an undue hardship, the accommodation does not have to be granted.

3. Change of Job Tasks and Lateral Transfer. When an employee’s religious belief or practice conflicts with a particular task, appropriate accommodations may include relieving the essay prompt, employee of the task or transferring the employee to gcse coursework wire a different position or location that eliminates the university application, conflict with the employee’s religion. Whether or not such accommodations pose an undue hardship will depend on factors such as the nature or importance of the seniors, duty at issue, the availability of others to perform the function, the availability of other positions, and the applicability of a CBA or seniority system. Restaurant Server Excused from Singing Happy Birthday. Kim, a server at a restaurant, informed her manager that she would not be able to join other waitresses in singing “Happy Birthday” to customers because she is a Jehovah’s Witness whose religious beliefs do not allow her to celebrate holidays, including birthdays. There were enough servers on duty at harvard application, any given time to perform this singing without affecting service.

The manager refused any accommodation. If Kim files a Title VII charge alleging denial of religious accommodation, she will prevail because the restaurant could have accommodated her with little or no expense or disruption. [174] Pharmacist Excused from Providing Contraceptives. Neil, a pharmacist, was hired by oil drilling a large corporation that operates numerous large pharmacies at which more than one pharmacist is on duty during all hours of operation. University Prompt. Neil informed his employer that he refused on religious grounds to participate in distributing contraceptives or answering any customer inquiries about contraceptives. The employer reasonably accommodated Neil by physics resistance offering to allow Neil to signal to a co-worker who would take over harvard university essay prompt, servicing any customer who telephoned, faxed, or came to business plans the pharmacy regarding contraceptives. [175] Pharmacist Not Permitted to Turn Away Customers.

In the above example, assume that instead of facilitating the university application essay, assistance of such customers by a co-worker, Neil leaves on hold indefinitely those who call on the phone about a contraceptive rather than transferring their calls, and walks away from in-store customers who seek to fill a contraceptive prescription rather than signaling a co-worker. The employer is not required to accommodate Neil’s request to remain in essay prompts such a position yet avoid all situations where he might even briefly interact with customers who have requested contraceptives, or to accommodate a disruption of business operations. The employer may discipline or terminate Neil for not meeting legitimate expectations. [176] The employee should be accommodated in his or her current position if doing so does not pose an undue hardship. [177] If no such accommodation is possible, the employer needs to consider whether lateral transfer is a possible accommodation. [178] For example, if a pharmacist who has a religious objection to dispensing contraceptives can be accommodated without undue hardship by allowing the university application essay, pharmacist to signal a co-worker to assist customers with such prescriptions, the employer cannot choose instead to accommodate by transferring the pharmacist to a different position. Moreover, if the pharmacist cannot be accommodated within his position, the usc emba essays, employer cannot transfer the pharmacist to a position that entails less pay, responsibility, or opportunity for advancement unless a lateral transfer is unavailable or would otherwise pose an undue hardship.[179] Lateral Transfer Versus Transfer to harvard essay a Lower-Paying Position. An electrical utility lineman requests accommodation of prompts for high school seniors, his Sabbath observance, but because the application, nature of his position requires being available to handle emergency problems at any time, there is no accommodation that would permit the lineman to remain in his position without posing an justice undue hardship. The employer can accommodate the lineman by offering a lateral transfer to another assignment at the same pay, if available. If, however, no job at the same pay is readily available, then the employer could satisfy its obligation to application prompt reasonably accommodate the lineman by offering to transfer him to a different job, even at lower pay, if one is sox fatherhood essay, available. [180]

4. Modifying Workplace Practices, Policies and Procedures. When an employer has a dress or grooming policy that conflicts with an harvard university application essay prompt employee’s religious beliefs or practices, the employee may ask for oil drilling essay an exception to the policy as a reasonable accommodation. [181] Religious grooming practices may relate, for example, to harvard application essay prompt shaving or hair length. Religious dress may include clothes, head or face coverings, jewelry, or other items. Absent undue hardship, religious discrimination may be found where an employer fails to accommodate the employee’s religious dress or grooming practices. Offshore Oil Drilling. [182] Prakash, who works for harvard university application CutX, a surgical instrument manufacturer, does not shave or trim his facial hair because of his Sikh religious observance. When he seeks a promotion to school manage the division responsible for sterilizing the instruments, his employer tells him that, to work in that division, he must shave or trim his beard because otherwise his beard may contaminate the sterile field. When Prakash explains that he cannot trim his beard for religious reasons, the employer offers to allow Prakash to wear two face masks instead of trimming his beard. Prakash thinks that wearing two masks is unreasonable and files a Title VII charge. CutX will prevail because it offered a reasonable accommodation that would eliminate Prakash’s religious conflict with the hygiene rule. Some courts have concluded that it would pose an undue hardship if an university prompt employer was required to accommodate a religious dress or grooming practice that conflicts with the public image the employer wishes to convey to customers. [183] While there may be circumstances in which allowing a particular exception to an employer’s dress and grooming policy would pose an undue hardship, an employer’s reliance on the broad rubric of “image” to deny a requested religious accommodation may in a given case be tantamount to reliance on customer religious bias (so-called “customer preference”) in violation of Title VII. [184]

Nasreen, a Muslim ticket agent for usc emba essays a commercial airline, wears a head scarf, or hijab, to work at the airport ticket counter. After September 11, 2001, her manager objected, telling Nasreen that the customers might think she was sympathetic to university application terrorist hijackers. Nasreen explains to her manager that wearing the hijab is her religious practice and continues to wear it. She is terminated for wearing it over her manager’s objection. Essay Justice. Customer fears or prejudices do not amount to harvard application essay undue hardship, and the refusal to white accommodate her and the termination, therefore, violate Title VII.

In addition, denying Nasreen the position due to perceptions of customer preferences about religious attire would be disparate treatment based on religion in prompt violation of physics resistance wire, Title VII, because it would be the same as refusing to hire Nasreen because she is harvard application prompt, a Muslim. White Essay. See supra § II-B. [185] There may be limited situations in which the need for uniformity of university application essay, appearance is so important that modifying the dress code would pose an undue hardship. [186] However, even in these situations, a case-by-case determination is advisable. [187] If any employee needs to use a workplace facility as a reasonable accommodation, for essay prompts school example use of a quiet area for prayer during break time, the harvard application essay prompt, employer should accommodate the request under Title VII unless it would pose an undue hardship. If the employer allows employees to use the facilities at oil drilling essay, issue for non-religious activities not related to work, it may be difficult for the employer to harvard essay prompt demonstrate that allowing the facilities to be used in the same manner for religious activities is coursework resistance, not a reasonable accommodation or poses an undue hardship. [188]

Use of harvard university application essay, Employer Facilities. An employee whose assigned work area is a factory floor rather than an criminal justice enclosed office asks his supervisor if he may use one of the company’s unoccupied conference rooms to pray during a scheduled break time. The supervisor must grant this request if it would not pose an undue hardship. Application. An undue hardship would exist, for example, if the only conference room is used for work meetings at offshore oil drilling, that time. However, the supervisor is harvard university essay, not required to gcse resistance provide the employee with his choice of the available locations, and can meet the accommodation obligation by making any appropriate location available that would accommodate the employee’s religious needs if this can be done absent undue hardship, for example by offering an unoccupied area of the work space rather than the application, conference room. c. Tests and Other Selection Procedures. An employer has an obligation to accommodate an employee or prospective employee when scheduling a test or administering other selection procedures, where the applicant has informed the usc emba essays, employer of university prompt, a sincerely held religious belief that conflicts with a pre-employment testing requirement, unless undue hardship would result. [189] An employer may not permit an applicant’s need for a religious accommodation to affect its decision whether or not to hire the applicant unless the employer can demonstrate that it cannot reasonably accommodate the applicant’s religious practice without undue hardship. [190] d. Providing Social Security Numbers. It will typically pose an undue hardship for an employer to accommodate an applicant or employee’s asserted religious belief against providing or using a social security number. [191] 5. Excusing Union Dues or Agency Fees. Absent undue hardship, Title VII requires employers and unions to accommodate an employee who holds religious objections to joining or financially supporting a union. [192] Such an employee can be accommodated by allowing the usc emba essays, equivalent of her union dues (payments by union members) or agency fees (payments often required from non-union members in a unionized workplace) to be paid to a charity agreeable to the employee, the union, and application essay, the employer. [193] Whether a charity-substitute accommodation for sox fatherhood essay payment of union dues would cause an undue hardship is an individualized determination based upon, among other things, the union’s size, operational costs, and the number of individuals that need the accommodation. [194] If an employee’s religious objection is not to joining or financially supporting the union, but rather to the union’s support of harvard university essay, certain political or social causes, the employee may be accommodated if it would not pose an oil drilling undue hardship by, for example, reducing the amount owed and/or by allowing the employee to donate to a charitable organization the full amount the application essay, employee owes or that portion that is attributable to the union’s support of the cause to business which the application prompt, employee has a religious objection, or by diverting the for high school, full amount to the national, state, or local union in the event one of those entities does not engage in support of the cause to which the harvard university essay, employee has a religious objection. Prompts For High School. [195]

6. Permitting Prayer, Proselytizing, and Other Forms of Religious Expression. Some employees may seek to display religious icons or messages at their work stations. Others may seek to proselytize by engaging in one-on-one discussions regarding religious beliefs, distributing literature, or using a particular religious phrase when greeting others. Still others may seek to engage in prayer at their work stations or to use other areas of the harvard essay prompt, workplace for either individual or group prayer or study. In some of these situations, an essays about employee might request accommodation in university application advance to permit such religious expression. In other situations, the employer will not learn of the situation or be called upon to consider any action unless it receives complaints about the religious expression from either other employees or customers. As noted in §§ II-A-3 and sox fatherhood, III-C of harvard application essay prompt, this document, prayer, proselytizing, and other forms of religious expression do not solely raise the issue of religious accommodation, but may also raise disparate treatment or harassment issues. To determine whether allowing or continuing to permit an sox fatherhood essay employee to pray, proselytize, or engage in other forms of religiously oriented expression in the workplace would pose an undue hardship, employers should consider the potential disruption, if any, that will be posed by permitting this expression of religious belief. [196] As explained below, relevant considerations may include the effect such expression has had, or can reasonably be expected to have, if permitted to harvard application continue, on co-workers, customers, or business operations. a. Effect on Workplace Rights of Co-Workers. Expression can create undue hardship if it disrupts the work of other employees or constitutes or threatens to constitute unlawful harassment. Since an employer has a duty under Title VII to offshore oil drilling essay protect employees from religious harassment, it would be an undue hardship to accommodate such expression.

As explained in § III-A-2-b of this document, religious expression directed toward co-workers might constitute harassment in some situations, for example where it is facially abusive ( i.e. , demeans people of other religions), or where, even if not abusive, it persists even though the co-workers to whom it is directed have made clear that it is application, unwelcome. It is necessary to make a case-by-case determination regarding whether the effect on co-workers actually is an undue hardship. However, this does not require waiting until the alleged harassment has become severe or pervasive. [197] As with harassment on any basis, it is permitted and advisable for employers to take action to stop alleged harassment before it becomes severe or pervasive, because while isolated incidents of white sox fatherhood, harassment generally do not violate federal law, a pattern of harvard university application essay, such incidents may be unlawful. [198] The determination of whether it is an undue hardship to allow employees to engage in religiously oriented expression toward customers is a fact-specific inquiry and will depend on the nature of the expression, the usc emba essays, nature of the employer’s business, and the extent of the impact on customer relations. For example, one court found that it did not impose an undue hardship for harvard application essay a private sector employer to essay allow a cashier to use the application essay prompt, general religious greeting “Have a Blessed Day” in accepting payment where it was said in the context of brief anonymous interactions and had little demonstrable adverse impact on customers or the business. [199] However, other courts have found undue hardship where religiously oriented expression was used in coursework resistance the context of a regular business interaction with a client. [200] Whether or not the essay prompt, client objects, this may be an undue hardship for an employer where the expression could be mistaken as the employer’s message. Where the gcse coursework resistance, religiously oriented expression is not limited to university application use of a phrase or greeting, but rather is in the manner of individualized, specific proselytizing, an employer is far more likely to be able to demonstrate that it would constitute an undue hardship to accommodate an white essay employee’s religious expression, regardless of the length or nature of the business interaction. [201] Display of Religious Objects By an Employee. Susan and Roger are members of the same church and are both employed at XYZ Corporation. Harvard University Prompt. Susan works as an architect in a private office on an upper floor, where she occasionally interacts with co-workers, but not with clients. Essay Criminal Justice. Roger is a security guard stationed at a desk in harvard essay prompt the front lobby of the XYZ building through which all employees, clients, and other visitors must enter.

At a recent service at Susan and Roger’s church, the on the justice, minister distributed posters with the application essay, message “Jesus Saves!” and encouraged parishioners to display the posters at their workplaces in order to “spread the word.” Susan and Roger each display the poster on the wall above their respective work stations. XYZ orders both to remove the poster despite the fact that both explained that they felt a religious obligation to display it, and despite the fact that there have been no complaints from co-workers or clients. Susan and Roger file charges alleging denial of religious accommodation. Gcse Resistance. The employer will probably be unable to show that allowing Susan to display a religious message in her personal workspace posed an undue hardship, because there was no evidence of harvard prompt, any disruption to the business or the white sox fatherhood essay, workplace which resulted. University Application Essay. By contrast, because Roger sits at the lobby desk and the poster is the first thing that visitors see upon entering the building, it would appear to represent XYZ’s views and would therefore likely be shown to pose an about undue hardship. [202] Undue Hardship to Allow Employee to application essay Discuss Religion with Clients. Helen, an employee in a mental health facility that served a religiously and ethnically diverse clientele, frequently spoke with clients about physics coursework wire, religious issues and shared religious tracts with them as a way to help solve their problems, despite being instructed not to do so. After clients complained, Helen’s employer issued her a letter of reprimand stating that she should not promote her religious beliefs to clients and that she would be terminated if she persisted. University Essay. Helen’s belief in the need to evangelize to clients cannot be accommodated without undue hardship. The employer has the right to control speech that threatens to resistance impede provision of university application essay prompt, effective and efficient services.

Clients, especially in a mental health setting, may not understand that the religious message represents Helen’s views rather than the clinic’s view of the essay prompts for high school seniors, most beneficial treatment for the patient. [203] Some employers have integrated their own religious beliefs or practices into the workplace, and harvard university application essay, they are entitled to do so. [204] However, if an employer holds religious services or programs or includes prayer in business meetings, Title VII requires that the employer accommodate an employee who asks to on the justice be excused for religious reasons, absent a showing of undue hardship. [205] Excusing an employee from religious services normally does not create an undue hardship because it does not cost the employer anything and university application prompt, does not disrupt business operations or other workers. [206] Prayer at essay prompts, Meetings. Michael’s employer requires that the mandatory weekly staff meeting begin with a religious prayer. Michael objects to participating because he believes it conflicts with his own sincerely held religious beliefs. Application Essay Prompt. He asks his supervisor to usc emba essays allow him to arrive at application essay, the meeting after the prayer. Gcse Physics Resistance Wire. The supervisor must accommodate Michael’s religious belief by either granting his request or offering an alternative accommodation that would remove the conflict between Michael’s religious belief and the staff meeting prayer, even if other employees of university, Michael’s religion do not object to being present for gcse physics wire the prayer. [207] Employer Holiday Decorations.

Each December, the president of XYZ corporation directs that several wreaths be placed around the office building and a tree be displayed in the lobby. Several employees complain that to accommodate their non-Christian religious beliefs, the employer should take down the wreaths and harvard university application essay, tree, or alternatively should add holiday decorations associated with other religions. For High. Title VII does not require that XYZ corporation remove the wreaths and tree or add holiday decorations associated with other religions. The result under Title VII on these facts would be the same whether in a private or government workplace. [208] Similarly, an employer is required, absent undue hardship, to excuse an employee from compulsory personal or professional development training where it conflicts with the university application essay, employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs or practices. [209] There may be cases, however, where an employer can show that it would pose an undue hardship to provide an alternative training or to excuse an employee from any part of a particular training, even if the employee asserts it is contrary to his religious beliefs to attend ( e.g. , where the training provides information on how to perform the job, on how to wire comply with equal employment opportunity obligations, or on other workplace policies, procedures, or applicable legal requirements). Religious Objection to Training Program Employee Must Be Excused. As part of its effort to promote employee health and productivity, the new president of university application, a company institutes weekly mandatory on-site meditation classes led by a local spiritualist. Usc Emba Essays. Angelina explains to application essay prompt her supervisor that the meditation conflicts with her sincerely held religious beliefs, and usc emba essays, asks to be excused from participating.

Because it would not pose an harvard application undue hardship, the offshore oil drilling, company must accommodate Angelina’s religious belief by prompt excusing her from the weekly meditation classes, even if the company and other employees believe that this form of meditation does not conflict with any religious beliefs. Religious Objection to Training Program Employee Need Not Be Excused. Employer XYZ holds an usc emba essays annual training for employees on a variety of personnel matters, including compliance with EEO laws and also XYZ’s own internal anti-discrimination policy, which includes a prohibition on sexual orientation discrimination. Harvard University Prompt. Lucille asks to be excused from the portion of the training on justice sexual orientation discrimination because she believes that it “promotes the acceptance of homosexuality,” which she sincerely believes is immoral and sinful based on her religion. Harvard University Application Prompt. The training does not tell employees to value different sexual orientations but simply discusses and reinforces the employer’s conduct rule requiring employees not to discriminate against or harass other employees and to treat one another professionally. Because an employer needs to make sure that its employees know about and comply with such employer workplace rules, it would be an undue hardship for physics coursework resistance XYZ to essay prompt excuse Lucille from the essay for high, training.[210] While not all of the following issues will be in dispute in every charge alleging denial of harvard essay prompt, religious accommodation, if CP alleges that R failed to accommodate CP’s religious beliefs or practices, the essays about, investigator should generally follow this line of inquiry, considering these steps: Ascertain the nature of the belief or practice that CP claims R has failed to accommodate ( e.g. , dress, grooming, holy day observance, etc.) and what accommodation was sought (e.g., exception to dress code, schedule change, leave, etc.). If disputed by R, determine whether CP’s beliefs are “religious” in nature.

If disputed by harvard prompt R, determine whether CP “sincerely holds” the particular religious belief or practice at issue. Ascertain whether CP actually notified R of the essay on the justice, need for a religious accommodation, i.e. , whether it was made known to R that an accommodation was needed and that it was for religious reasons. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. The investigator should seek evidence of when, where, how, and to whom such notice was given, and the names of any witnesses to the notification. If R claims that it was not notified of CP’s need for gcse coursework resistance an accommodation, the investigator should attempt to resolve the university application essay prompt, discrepancies between R’s contention and CP’s allegation by gathering additional available evidence corroborating or refuting CP’s and essay, R’s contentions. Determine R’s response, if any, to the accommodation request. Was an accommodation offered, and if so, what? The investigator should obtain R’s statement of all attempts to accommodate CP, if any attempts were made. The investigator should seek a specific and complete explanation from R as to the facts on which it relied ( e.g. , why R concluded CP did not have a sincerely-held religious belief or practice, or why R concluded that accommodation would have posed an undue hardship in terms of prompt, cost, disruption, effect on co-workers, or any other reason).

For example, in essay prompts school seniors the event R is a union and the accommodation claim relates to essay prompt payment of agency fees or union dues, the business, investigator should obtain any relevant information regarding how the harvard university prompt, particular union at issue may have handled payment by this religious objector in order to provide accommodation. If R asserts that it did not accommodate CP’s request because it would have posed an undue hardship, obtain all available evidence regarding whether or not a hardship would in essay prompts for high seniors fact have been posed, i.e. , whether the alleged burden is more than de minimis . If R’s undue hardship defense is based on cost, ascertain the cost of the accommodation in harvard application prompt relation to R’s size, nature of business operations, operating costs, and the impact, if any, of similar accommodations already being provided to other employees. If R’s undue hardship defense is based on a factor other than cost ( i.e. , disruption, production or staffing levels, security, or other factor), similarly ascertain the impact of the accommodation with respect to R’s particular workplace and business. When there is more than one method of for high seniors, accommodation available that would not cause undue hardship, the harvard university application essay prompt, investigator should evaluate whether the business plans, accommodation offered is harvard prompt, reasonable by examining: (1) whether any alternative reasonable accommodation was available; (2) whether R considered any alternatives for accommodation; (3) the alternative(s) for accommodation, if any, that R actually offered to CP; and (4) whether the alternative(s) the usc emba essays, employer offered eliminated the harvard application, conflict. [211] If R asserts CP failed to cooperate with R in reaching an coursework accommodation, obtain any available evidence regarding the harvard university application, relevant communications, including whether CP refused any offer of reasonable accommodation. Reasonable Accommodation - Generally. Employers should inform employees that they will make reasonable efforts to accommodate the usc emba essays, employees’ religious practices.

Employers should train managers and supervisors on how to recognize religious accommodation requests from employees. University Essay. Employers should consider developing internal procedures for processing religious accommodation requests. Gcse Physics Resistance. Employers should individually assess each request and avoid assumptions or stereotypes about what constitutes a religious belief or practice or what type of accommodation is appropriate. Employers and employees should confer fully and promptly to harvard university prompt the extent needed to coursework resistance share any necessary information about the application essay prompt, employee’s religious needs and the available accommodation options. An employer is not required to provide an essay employee’s preferred accommodation if there is more than one effective alternative to harvard choose from. Wire. An employer should, however, consider the employee’s proposed method of accommodation, and if it is denied, explain to university application essay prompt the employee why his proposed accommodation is not being granted. Managers and supervisors should be trained to usc emba essays consider alternative available accommodations if the particular accommodation requested would pose an undue hardship. When faced with a request for a religious accommodation which cannot be promptly implemented, an application essay prompt employer should consider offering alternative methods of accommodation on a temporary basis, while a permanent accommodation is being explored. Usc Emba Essays. In this situation, an employer should also keep the employee apprised of the application, status of the employer’s efforts to coursework resistance implement a permanent accommodation. The de minimis undue hardship standard refers to the legal requirement. As with all aspects of employee relations, employers can go beyond the requirements of the law and should be flexible in evaluating whether or not an accommodation is feasible.

An employer should not assume that an university accommodation will conflict with the terms of a seniority system or CBA without first checking if there are any exceptions for religious accommodation or other avenues to resistance allow accommodation consistent with the seniority system or CBA. An employer should not automatically reject a request for religious accommodation just because the accommodation will interfere with the existing seniority system or terms of a CBA. Although an employer may not upset co-workers’ settled expectations, an employer is harvard university essay prompt, free to seek a voluntary modification to a CBA in order to accommodate an employee’s religious needs. Employers should train managers to be aware that, if the requested accommodation would violate the CBA or seniority system, they should confer with the employee to determine if an alternative accommodation is prompts school seniors, available. Application. Employers should ensure that managers are aware that reasonable accommodation may require making exceptions to for high seniors policies or procedures that are not part of a CBA or seniority system, where it would not infringe on other employees’ legitimate expectations. Employers should work with employees who need an adjustment to their work schedule to accommodate their religious practices. Notwithstanding that the legal standard for undue hardship is “more than de minimis ,” employers may of essay, course choose voluntarily to essay criminal justice incur whatever additional operational or financial costs they deem appropriate to accommodate an employee’s religious need for scheduling flexibility. Employers should consider adopting flexible leave and scheduling policies and procedures that will often allow employees to meet their religious and other personal needs. Such policies can reduce individual requests for exceptions. For example, some employers have policies allowing alternative work schedules and/or a certain number of “floating” holidays for each employee. Essay Prompt. While such policies may not cover every eventuality and some individual accommodations may still be needed, the number of essays about business plans, such individual accommodations may be substantially reduced.

Voluntary Substitutes or Swaps. An employer should facilitate and encourage voluntary substitutions and university application essay prompt, swaps with employees of plans, substantially similar qualifications by publicizing its policy permitting such arrangements, promoting an harvard prompt atmosphere in which substitutes are favorably regarded, and white sox fatherhood, providing a central file, bulletin board, group e-mail, or other means to harvard prompt help an employee with a religious conflict find a volunteer to prompts school seniors substitute or swap. Change of Job Assignments and Lateral Transfers. An employer should consider a lateral transfer when no accommodation which would keep the employee in his or her position is possible absent undue hardship. However, an employer should only resort to transfer, whether lateral or otherwise, after fully exploring accommodations that would permit the harvard university prompt, employee to remain in his position. Where a lateral transfer is unavailable, an employer should not assume that an employee would not be interested in a lower-paying position if that position would enable the employee to abide by essay for high his or her religious beliefs.

If there is no accommodation available that would permit the employee to remain in his current position or an equivalent one, the university application, employer should offer the available position as an gcse physics resistance accommodation and harvard application essay, permit the employee to gcse coursework resistance wire decide whether or not to take it. Modifying Workplace Practices, Policies, and Procedures. Employers should make efforts to accommodate an employee’s desire to wear a yarmulke, hijab, or other religious garb. If the employer is concerned about uniform appearance in a position which involves interaction with the public, it may be appropriate to consider whether the employee’s religious views would permit him to resolve the religious conflict by, for example, wearing the item of religious garb in the company uniform color(s). Managers and essay prompt, employees should be trained not to engage in stereotyping based on religious dress and grooming practices and should not assume that atypical dress will create an undue hardship. Employers should be flexible and usc emba essays, creative regarding work schedules, work duties, and selection procedures to the extent practicable. Employers should be sensitive to the risk of unintentionally pressuring or coercing employees to attend social gatherings after the employees have indicated a religious objection to university attending. Permitting Prayer, Proselytizing, and for high, Other Forms of Religious Expression. Employers should train managers to gauge the actual disruption posed by harvard university application essay religious expression in the workplace, rather than merely speculating that disruption may result.

Employers should also train managers to identify alternative accommodations that might be offered to usc emba essays avoid actual disruption ( e.g. , designating an unused or private location in the workplace where a prayer session or Bible study meeting can occur if it is disrupting other workers). Essay Prompt. Employers should incorporate a discussion of religious expression, and offshore essay, the need for harvard application essay prompt all employees to be sensitive to usc emba essays the beliefs or non-beliefs of others, into any anti-harassment training provided to managers and employees. Employees should advise their supervisors or managers of the harvard university application, nature of the gcse, conflict between their religious needs and the work rules. Employees should provide enough information to enable the employer to understand what accommodation is needed, and why it is necessitated by university prompt a religious practice or belief. White Essay. Employees who seek to proselytize in the workplace should cease doing so with respect to any individual who indicates that the communications are unwelcome.

12-V RELATED FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION. A. National Origin, Race , and Color. Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination may overlap with Title VII’s prohibitions against discrimination based on harvard national origin, race, and color. Where a given religion is strongly associated or perceived to be associated with a certain national origin, the same facts may state a claim of both religious and national origin discrimination. [212] All four bases might be implicated where, for example, co-workers target a dark-skinned Muslim employee from Saudi Arabia for usc emba essays harassment because of his religion, national origin, race, and/or color. [213] Title VII prohibits retaliation by harvard application prompt an employer, employment agency, or labor organization because an individual has engaged in protected activity. [214] Protected activity consists of essay school, opposing a practice the employee reasonably believes is made unlawful by one of the employment discrimination statutes or of filing a charge, testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the statute. EEOC has taken the harvard university prompt, position that requesting religious accommodation is white essay, protected activity. [215] Retaliation for Requesting Accommodation. Jenny requests that she be excused from harvard daily employer-sponsored Christian prayer meetings because she is an atheist.

Her supervisor insists that she attend, but she persists in her request that she should be excused, and explains that requiring her to attend is offensive to her religious beliefs. She takes her request to usc emba essays human resources, and informs them that requiring her to attend these prayer meetings is offensive to her religious beliefs. Despite her supervisor’s objections, the human resources department instructs the supervisor that in the circumstances no undue hardship is posed and he must grant the request. Motivated by reprisal, her supervisor shortly thereafter gives her an unjustified poor performance rating, and denies her requests to attend training that is harvard application essay, approved for essays business similarly situated employees. This violates Title VII. Employers can reduce the prompt, risk of retaliation claims by training managers and supervisors to be aware of sox fatherhood, their anti-retaliation obligations under Title VII, including specific actions that may constitute retaliation. Employers can help reduce the harvard application prompt, risk of usc emba essays, retaliation claims by carefully and harvard essay, timely recording the accurate business reasons for disciplinary or performance related actions and sharing these reasons with the employee. HOW APPLICANTS OR EMPLOYEES CAN FILE A CHARGE. If you believe you have been discriminated against by usc emba essays a private sector or state or local government employer, labor union, or employment agency when applying for a job or while on the job because of your race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 or over), or disability, or believe that you have been discriminated against university application, because you opposed unlawful discrimination or participated in an equal employment opportunity (EEO) proceeding, you may file a charge of discrimination with the U.S.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Charges against essays business plans, private sector and local and university essay prompt, state government employers may be filed in person, by mail, or by telephone by offshore oil drilling essay contacting the harvard application, nearest EEOC office. If there is no EEOC office in the immediate area, call toll free 1-800?669?4000 or 1?800?669?6820 (TTY) for more information. To avoid delay, call or write beforehand if you need special assistance, such as an interpreter, to file a charge. Federal sector employees and applicants should contact the EEO office of the agency responsible for coursework wire the alleged discrimination to initiate EEO counseling. There are strict time frames in which charges of employment discrimination must be filed or your agency’s EEO office must be contacted. When charges or complaints are filed beyond these time frames, you may not be able to obtain any remedy. Charges against harvard prompt, private sector or state or local governments must be filed with EEOC within 180 days of the alleged discriminatory act.

The time frame is about plans, extended to 300 days if the university prompt, alleged discrimination arose in a state or locality that has a fair employment practices agency (FEPA) with the authority to grant or seek relief for the alleged discrimination. Federal sector employees and applicants must initiate EEO counseling at the agency responsible for the alleged discrimination within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event. Allegations of harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin are timely if at least one incident of oil drilling essay, harassment that is application essay, part of the larger pattern of essay prompts school, harassment occurred within the filing period. If you wish to remain anonymous during the period when an harvard application prompt EEOC charge is being processed involving a private sector or state or local government employer, another individual or an organization may file a charge on your behalf. In some circumstances, an EEOC Commissioner may file a charge against a private sector or state or local government employer. Prompts For High School Seniors. Federal sector employees and applicants may remain anonymous during EEO counseling, but lose the right to harvard university anonymity after filing a formal complaint. WHEN A CHARGE IS FILED AGAINST A PRIVATE SECTOR OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYER. This appendix provides general information regarding the sox fatherhood essay, processing of harvard university, a charge alleging discrimination by a private sector or state or local government employer under the EEO statutes. The information presented in this appendix applies to private sector and justice, state and local government employers only. For information on harvard university application essay prompt the processing of complaints against white sox fatherhood, federal agencies, visit the EEOC’s “Federal Sector Information” page on the Internet at http://eeoc.gov/federal/fed_employees/index.cfm. Anyone who believes that a private sector or state or local government employer has violated his or her employment rights based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age (40 or over), disability, opposition to unlawful discrimination, or participation in an EEO proceeding, may file a charge of harvard application essay prompt, discrimination with the EEOC.

A charge does not constitute a finding that your company did, in business plans fact, discriminate. The EEOC has a responsibility to investigate and determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe discrimination occurred. That process begins with the EEOC sending your company a copy of the charge, which will briefly identify the charging party, the basis ( e.g. , race, religion, etc.) and issues (hiring, promotion, etc.), and the date(s) of the alleged discrimination. You also may be asked to provide a response to harvard application essay the charge and supporting documentation. Sox Fatherhood Essay. The EEOC also may ask to visit your work site or to harvard university application essay prompt interview some employees. It is important that your company retain records relating to issues under investigation as a result of the charge until the charge or any lawsuit based on the charge is essays about business, resolved. In some cases, the EEOC notice may offer mediation as a method of resolving the charge before an investigation. EEOC’s mediation program is harvard university application essay prompt, a free service, and participation is voluntary. The process is gcse coursework resistance, confidential, and there is a firewall ( i.e. , total separation) between the mediation program and EEOC’s enforcement activities. Mediation provides employers and harvard, charging parties the essay for high seniors, opportunity to reach mutually agreeable solutions early in the process.

The EEOC will notify your company if a charge is harvard essay prompt, eligible for mediation. In the event that mediation does not succeed, the gcse coursework resistance wire, charge is referred for investigation. If the EEOC finds reasonable cause to believe that your company discriminated against a charging party, it will invite you to harvard university application conciliate the charge ( i.e. Essay For High School Seniors. , the EEOC will offer you a chance to prompt resolve the matter informally). In some cases, where conciliation fails, the EEOC will file a civil court action. If the essays, EEOC does not find discrimination, or if conciliation fails and the EEOC chooses not to file suit, it will issue a notice of a right to sue, which gives the harvard application essay prompt, charging party 90 days to file a civil court action. Oil Drilling Essay. The EEOC also must issue a notice of right to sue to the charging party on request if its handling of the charge is still pending after 180 days, or earlier if the EEOC knows it will take more than 180 days to complete action on the charge. In all cases, your company should remember that it is harvard prompt, unlawful to retaliate against the charging party for filing the charge, even if you believe the charge is without merit. You should submit a response to the EEOC and provide the information requested, even if you believe the charge is frivolous.

If the charge was not dismissed by the EEOC when it was received, that means there was some basis for proceeding with further investigation. There are many cases where it is unclear whether discrimination may have occurred and an investigation is necessary. You are encouraged to present any facts that you believe show the allegations are incorrect or do not amount to a violation of the law. [1] This document uses examples that refer to the practices and beliefs of various religions. These examples are intended to clarify the legal principles for offshore which they are used and do not purport to represent the harvard university application essay prompt, religious beliefs or practices to which they refer.

In some instances, links to essays about plans non-EEOC Internet sites are also provided for the reader’s convenience in obtaining additional information. EEOC assumes no responsibility for application essay prompt their content and does not endorse their organizations or guarantee the accuracy of these sites. [2] This Section of the on the, Compliance Manual replaces Section 628: Religious Accommodation , EEOC Compliance Manual, Volume II and its Appendices: Appendix A, Policy Statement on Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook and Religious Accommodation ; Appendix B, Policy Guidance On ‘New Age’ Training Programs Which Conflict With Employees’ Religious Beliefs ; and Appendix C, Religious Objections to Unionism . It also replaces the following policy documents: Religious Organizations that Pay Women Less than Men in application essay Accordance with Religious Beliefs ; Religious Organization Exemption Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ; and essay, Policy Statement on Goldman v. University Essay. Weinberger (Accommodation of the Wearing of Religious Dress ). The Commission’s Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion (hereafter Commission Guidelines ) are not affected by this Section. See Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. Part 1605. [3] Use of the term “employee” in this document should be presumed to include an applicant and, as appropriate, a former employee. [4] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) provides that it is an resistance unlawful employment practice for application essay prompt an employer: (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to essay school discriminate against essay prompt, any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or.

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in offshore essay any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of prompt, such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j) provides that: The term “religion” includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business. [5] Federal legislation known as the physics coursework wire, Workplace Religious Freedom Act (“WRFA”), that has been proposed since the 1990s, would amend Title VII to change the current “ de minimis ” standard for university application essay prompt establishing undue hardship to require employers to oil drilling essay show that the accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense. See H.R. 1431, 110th Cong. (2007). This compliance manual chapter interprets and applies the current federal law, and takes no position on university WRFA. Note: Various state and local laws extend beyond Title VII in terms of the protected bases covered, the discrimination prohibited or accommodation required, and the legal standards and oil drilling essay, defenses that apply. [6] See, e.g., Torcaso v. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. Watkins , 367 U.S. Oil Drilling. 488, 495 n.11 (1961) (First Amendment does not permit government to distinguish between theistic and non-theistic religions such as Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, and university, Secular Humanism); Young v. Southwestern Sav. Loan Ass’n, 509 F.2d 140 (5th Cir.

1975) (Title VII violated by requiring atheist employee to on the justice attend prayer portion of business meeting). [7] Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and university application essay, the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, Religion in the Workplace Survey, at 6 (Society for Human Resource Management, 2001) (executive summary and criminal justice, information on obtaining report available at http://www.tanenbaum.org/research.html (last visited July 2, 2008); Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, U.S. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. Religious Landscape Survey (2008), available at http://religions.pewforum.org/reports (last visited July 2, 2008). [8] In fiscal year 2007, EEOC received 2,880 religious discrimination charges, accounting for 3.5% of all charges filed with the Commission that year. Essay. In fiscal year 1992, EEOC received 1,388 religious discrimination charges, accounting for 1.9% of all charges filed with the Commission that year. University Essay. Statistics regarding the white essay, number of religious discrimination charges filed with the Commission can be found at essay, http://eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm. [9] “Religion in the Workplace is a Diversity Issue for U.S. Companies,” U.S. Usc Emba Essays. Department of State’s Bureau of International Information Programs (Nov. 28, 2007), available at http://www.america.gov/st/ washfile-english/2007/November/20071128173019xlrennef0.1781427.html (last visited July 2, 2008). [10] The principles discussed in this Section apply to harvard university application Title VII claims against private employers as well as to federal, state, and local public sector employers, unless otherwise noted.

See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e(a) - (b), 2000e-16(a), et seq. , and about business, 2000e-16a. See, e.g. University Essay Prompt. , infra nn.11-15, 66 (directing attention to situations where the white, Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) may apply), and 201-203. As explained in n.5, supra , claims under various state or local laws may be analyzed under different standards. [11] The First Amendment religion and speech clauses (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech”) protect individuals against restrictions imposed by the government, not by private entities, and therefore do not apply to rules imposed on private sector employees by their employers. The First Amendment, however, does protect private sector employers from government interference with their free exercise and speech rights. Moreover, government employees’ religious expression is protected by both the First Amendment and Title VII. See infra nn.12-15, 66, and accompanying text; Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d 650 (8th Cir. 1995); Guidelines on Religious Exercise and harvard application essay prompt, Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace (Aug. 14, 1997) (hereafter Federal Workplace Guidelines ), 158 Daily Labor Report (BNA) 1522-5968 (Aug. School Seniors. 15, 1997) (available at http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/New/html/19970819-3275.html (last visited July 2, 2008)).

Although the Federal Workplace Guidelines are directed at federal employers, they provide useful guidance for private employers as well. In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice maintains a website, www.firstfreedom.gov, which provides information on a variety of constitutional and statutory religious discrimination issues, including a section on Title VII employment protections based on harvard application essay religion. [12] See Daniels v. City of Arlington , 246 F.3d 500 (5th Cir.) (as a government entity, police department may be able to demonstrate that providing the requested accommodation would have posed an usc emba essays undue hardship because allowing the officer to wear a cross on his uniform would give the appearance of public agency endorsement of the officer’s religious views, in violation of the department’s constitutional obligations), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 951 (2001); Helland v. Harvard University Application Prompt. South Bend Cmty. Sch. Corp. , 93 F.3d 327 (7th Cir. 1996) (public school did not violate either plaintiff’s Title VII religious accommodation right or his First Amendment free exercise right by removing plaintiff from substitute teacher list due to his proselytizing in prompts school class); Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 656-59 (where there was no evidence that subordinates objected on religious grounds , it would not have posed an undue hardship under Title VII, or violated the First Amendment Establishment Clause, to accommodate supervisor’s occasional affirmations of Christianity and spontaneous voluntary prayers during meetings). [13] See, e.g., EEOC v. Townley Eng’g Mfg.

Co. , 859 F.2d 610, 621 (9th Cir. University Essay. 1988) (court must balance the application of Title VII to essay prompts for high school seniors the employment policy against private employers’ right under First Amendment Free Exercise clause to practice their religion; private secular employer’s free exercise right to hold mandatory religious services for employees did not outweigh its Title VII obligation to accommodate atheist employee’s request to be exempt from university application attending the services on gcse coursework resistance wire religious grounds; excusing plaintiff’s attendance would not pose an university application essay prompt undue hardship on operation of employer’s business). [14] See, e.g., Knight v. Connecticut Dep’t of Pub. Health , 275 F.3d 156, 164-65 (2d Cir. 2001) (state agency did not violate either Title VII or First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by refusing to allow employee to evangelize clients of physics resistance, state agency while performing job duties; in university application addition, employer would have risked First Amendment Establishment Clause violation by physics coursework permitting the accommodation); Fraternal Order of Police v. Application Prompt. City of Newark , 170 F.3d 359 (3d Cir. 1999) (police department violated Sunni Muslim officer’s First Amendment free exercise rights by usc emba essays refusing to harvard university application make a religious exception to its “no beard” policy to accommodate his beliefs, while exempting other officers for medical reasons); Draper v. Usc Emba Essays. Logan County Pub. Library , 403 F. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D.

Ky. 2005) (public library employee’s First Amendment free speech and free exercise rights were violated when she was prohibited from wearing a necklace with a cross ornament). [15] Guidance for government workplaces on essay the First Amendment religious free exercise issues, much of which is also useful for the private sector, is available in essay the Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11 ; see also Brown , 61 F.3d at 658 (applying First Amendment test governing free speech of public employees to First Amendment free exercise claims, court balanced an employee’s right to free exercise with the employer’s interest in providing effective and efficient public services; public employee’s termination constituted both denial of essay, religious accommodation under Title VII and resistance, violation of First Amendment Free Exercise Clause). [16] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. University. To determine whether an entity is covered by Title VII, see EEOC Compliance Manual, “Threshold Issues,” https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/threshold.html. Although this document concerns Title VII, employers and employees should note that there may be state and local laws in their jurisdiction prohibiting religious discrimination in oil drilling essay employment, some of which may be parallel to harvard university application prompt Title VII and some of which may afford narrower or broader coverage.

[18] “Theistic” is defined as “believing in white essay a god or gods.” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language , Fourth Ed , Houghton Mifflin Co. (2004), available at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theistic (last visited July 2, 2008). [19] 42 U.S.C. University Prompt. § 2000e(j). Redmond v. GAF Corp. , 574 F.2d 897, 900 (7th Cir. 1978) (the statutory language “all aspects of religious practice and belief” is interpreted broadly; “to restrict the act to offshore oil drilling those practices which are mandated or prohibited by a tenet of the religion, would involve the court in determining not only what are the tenets of a particular religion, which by itself perhaps would not be beyond the province of the court, but would frequently require the courts to decide whether a particular practice is or is not required by the tenets of the religion”); s ee also Employment Div., Dep’t of Human Res. of Oregon v. Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 887 (1990) (in holding that the Free Exercise Clause did not prohibit application of Oregon drug laws to ceremonial ingestion of peyote, Court noted that “[r]epeatedly and in many different contexts, we have warned that courts must not presume to harvard university application prompt determine the place of a particular belief in a religion or the plausibility of a religious claim”). [20] Thomas v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Sec. Div. , 450 U.S. 707, 714 (1981) (“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection”); see also Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah , 508 U.S. Essay Prompts For High Seniors. 520, 531 (1993) (although animal sacrifice may seem “abhorrent” to some, Santerian belief is religious in nature and is protected by the First Amendment); U.S. v. Meyers , 906 F. Supp. 1494, 1499 (D. Wyo.

1995) (“one man’s religion will always be another man’s heresy”). [21] Thomas , 450 U.S. at 716 (“[I]t is not within the judicial function and harvard university prompt, judicial competence to inquire whether the petitioner or [another practitioner] . . Essay Prompts. . more correctly perceived the commands of their common faith. Courts are not arbiters of scriptural interpretation.”). [22] Redmond , 574 F.2d at 901 n.12 (Title VII case citing United States v. Harvard University Essay. Seeger , 380 U.S. 163 (1969), and Welsh v. United States , 398 U.S. 333 (1970), which defined protected “religion” for purposes of the criminal, Universal Military Training and Service Act). Unless otherwise noted, cases are cited in this document for their Title VII holdings.

[23] Seeger , 380 U.S. at 176. “This standard was developed in [ Seeger ] and harvard application prompt, [ Welsh ]. The Commission has consistently applied this standard in its decisions.” 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1. [24] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (“The fact that no religious group espouses such beliefs or the gcse coursework resistance wire, fact that the religious group to which the university application essay, individual professes to belong may not accept such belief will not determine whether the belief is a religious belief of the employee or prospective employee.”); Welsh, 398 U.S. at 343 (petitioner’s beliefs were religious in business plans nature although the church to application prompt which he belonged did not teach those beliefs); accord Africa v. Commonwealth of Pa ., 662 F.2d 1025, 1032-33 (3d Cir.1981); Bushouse v. Local Union 2209, United Auto., Aerospace Agric. Implement Workers of Am. , 164 F. Usc Emba Essays. Supp. 2d 1066, 1076 n.15 (N.D. Ind. 2001) (“Title VII’s intention is to provide protection and accommodation for a broad spectrum of religious practices and belief not merely those beliefs based upon harvard university application prompt organized or recognized teachings of a particular sect”). [25] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1; Torcaso , 367 U.S. at 489-90 (government may not favor theism over gcse coursework resistance wire, pantheism or atheism); Welsh , 398 U.S.

333 (to be religion protected by the First Amendment, a belief system need not have a concept of a god, supreme being, or afterlife; plaintiff’s belief was deemed to be religious because it was held with strength of harvard prompt, traditional religious beliefs); Townley , 859 F.2d 610 (Title VII prohibits an employer from compelling its atheist employees to essays business plans attend religious services); Young , 509 F.2d 140 (same). [26] United States v. Meyers, 906 F. Supp. 1494, 1499 (D. Wyo. 1995) (the threshold for establishing the religious nature of beliefs is university application, low; under the First Amendment, “if there is any doubt about whether a particular set of beliefs constitutes a religion, the Court will err on the side of freedom and find that the beliefs are a religion. . On The Justice. . . [because the country’s] founders were animated in harvard university application essay prompt large part by a desire for usc emba essays religious liberty”), aff’d , 95 F.3d 1475, 1482-83 (10th Cir. Harvard University Essay. 1996); see also Smith , 494 U.S. at 887 (in holding that the Free Exercise Clause did not prohibit application of Oregon drug laws to ceremonial ingestion of peyote, Court noted that “[r]epeatedly and in many different contexts, we have warned that courts must not presume to determine the place of a particular belief in a religion or the plausibility of a religious claim”). [27] Meyers, 906 F. Supp. at essays, 1502 (religions address “ultimate ideas,” i.e. , “fundamental questions about life, purpose, and death”; holding that single-faceted worship of marijuana was not a religion for First Amendment purposes), aff’d , 95 F.3d at harvard application essay prompt, 1483; accord Africa, 662 F.2d at 1032 (“a religion [protected by the First Amendment] addresses fundamental and ultimate questions having to essay do with deep and imponderable matters [and] . . . is comprehensive in nature; it consists of a belief-system as opposed to an isolated teaching”); Dettmer v. Harvard University Essay. Landon , 617 F. Supp. Physics Coursework Resistance Wire. 592, 595-96 (E.D. Va.

1985) (under the First Amendment, Wiccans’ belief is religious in nature because, among other things, the belief structure relates to essay prompt “ultimate” concerns and reflects a broad concern for essay prompts school improving the quality of harvard application prompt, life for others), aff’d in white essay relevant part and harvard application, rev’d on other grounds , 799 F.2d 929 (4th Cir. 1986); Church of the Chosen People (No. Am. Panarchate) v. United States , 548 F. Supp. 1247 (D. White Sox Fatherhood. Minn. 1982) (a church whose single-faceted doctrine concerned sexual preference and not ultimate questions was not a religion entitled to tax exemption); Brown v. Pena , 441 F. Supp. 1382, 1385 (S.D.

Fla. 1977) (“religious” belief under Title VII “is based on a theory of ‘man’s nature or his place in the Universe,’ [and is] not merely a personal preference”), aff’d, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979). Although “religion” is often marked by university application essay prompt external manifestations such as ceremonies, rituals or clergy, such manifestations are not required for a belief to be “religious.” E.g., Malnak v. Yogi, 592 F.2d 197, 209-10 (3d Cir. Gcse Coursework Wire. 1979). [28] For example, EEOC and courts have found that the Ku Klux Klan is not a religion within the essay prompt, meaning of essay, Title VII because its philosophy has a narrow, temporal, and political character. Commission Decision No. 79-06, CCH EEOC Decisions ¶ 6737 (1983); Bellamy v. Mason’s Stores, Inc., 368 F. Supp. 1025, 1026 (E.D.

Va. 1973), aff’d , 508 F.2d 504 (4th Cir. 1974); Slater v. Harvard Prompt. King Soopers , 809 F. Supp. 809, 810 (D. Colo. 1992) (dismissing religious discrimination claim by a member of the Ku Klux Klan who allegedly was fired for participating in criminal justice a Hitler rally because the Ku Klux Klan is “political and social in nature” and harvard application prompt, is not a religion for Title VII purposes); s ee also Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Usc Emba Essays. Supp.

1382 (plaintiff’s belief that eating cat food contributes to his well-being is a personal preference and not a religion). In an analogous case, Peterson v. Wilmur Communications, Inc ., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1014, 1022 (E.D. Wis. 2002), the court held that an employee’s membership in the World Church of the Creator was a “religious” belief, even though the organization’s central tenet is prompt, white supremacy, because “it functions as religion in [plaintiff’s] life” as evidenced by the fact that he has been a minister in it for more than three years, worked to put the church’s teachings into practice, and actively proselytizes. However, the Peterson court might have reached a different conclusion had it considered whether the belief was merely one-dimensional and thus not religious, i.e. , not part of a moral or ethical belief system concerning “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and resistance, death.” [29] Compare Tiano v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc ., 139 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. Harvard University Prompt. 1998) (employer not liable for denying employee’s request to be absent from work on particular dates to attend a religious pilgrimage where the essays plans, evidence showed that her religious needs could be met by going on the pilgrimage at another time and that the particular dates she requested were simply a personal preference), with Heller v. EBB Auto Co. , 8 F.3d 1433 (9th Cir. 1993) (employer liable for harvard prompt failing to accommodate Jewish employee’s attendance of spouse’s conversion ceremony); see also Wessling v. Kroger Co. , 554 F. Supp. 548 (E.D.

Mich. 1982) (employer not liable for usc emba essays denial of accommodation where employee requested leave to help children get into their costumes and practice before performance of harvard application essay, church play; employee’s own testimony revealed her participation in this instance was more in the nature of a parental and social obligation); Redmond , 574 F.2d at 901 (employer liable for essay prompts for high school failing to accommodate employee’s participation in Saturday Bible classes; the court found his attendance to be pursuant to a sincerely held religious belief given that he was appointed to be lifetime leader of harvard essay prompt, his church Bible study class many years earlier, time of meeting was scheduled by church elders, and employee felt that his participation was at dictate of his elders and constituted a “religious obligation”); Weitkenaut v. On The. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co. Harvard Prompt. , 381 F. Supp. 1284, 1288?89 (D. Essays Business Plans. Vt. 1974) (employer liable for failing to protect minister’s attendance at monthly church organizational meetings where it was considered necessary to preparing for his pastoral duties and thus essential to his ability to lead his congregation). [30] Cf. LaFevers v. Saffle , 936 F.2d 1117 (10th Cir. 1991) (although not all Seventh-day Adventists are vegetarian, an university application essay individual adherent’s genuine religious belief in such a dietary practice warrants constitutional protection under the on the justice, First Amendment). [31] See, e.g., Wessling v. Harvard University Essay Prompt. Kroger Co. , 554 F. Supp. 548 (E.D.

Mich. 1982) (court held that plaintiff, who had volunteered to arrive at prompts for high, Church early to set up, decorate, and university application essay prompt, receive children prior to their performance of sox fatherhood, a play during Christmas Mass, was engaging in university prompt a social and on the justice, family obligation rather than a religious belief, practice, or observance). [32] See Dettmer v. Landon, 799 F.2d 929, 932 (4th Cir. 1986) (in First Amendment case, rejecting argument that witchcraft was a “conglomeration” of “various aspects of the harvard university essay prompt, occult” rather than a religion; religious beliefs need not be “acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others” to be protected); Washington Ethical Soc’y v. District of Columbia , 249 F.2d 127, 128 (D.C. Cir. Offshore. 1957) (Ethical Society qualifies as a “religious corporation or society” and its building is entitled to tax exemption; belief in a Supreme Being or supernatural power is not essential to qualify for university prompt tax exemption accorded to “religious corporations,” “churches” or “religious societies”); Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda , 315 P.2d 394 (Cal. App. 1957) (same holding with respect to Secular Humanists). [33] EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. , 2005 WL 2090677 (W.D. Wash.

Aug. 29, 2005) (denying employer’s motion for summary judgment on accommodation claim arising from employee’s refusal to cover his Kemetic religious tattoos in order to comply with employer’s dress code). [34] These facts are similar to those in Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp. , 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 2004). However, the court in Cloutier did not resolve the issue of whether or not the offshore essay, plaintiff’s facial piercing, which she alleged was displayed pursuant to her adherence to the beliefs of the Church of university essay, Body Modification, was part of essay prompts school seniors, a “religious” belief, practice, or observance, instead finding that the essay, proposed accommodation of allowing display of the piercing would have posed an usc emba essays undue hardship. [35] Seeger , 380 U.S. at 185 (“[w]hile the ‘truth’ of harvard university application essay, a belief is physics coursework resistance, not open to question, there remains the significant question of whether it is ‘truly held’”). [36] EEOC v. Union Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos, 279 F.3d 49, 56 (1st Cir. 2002) (evidence that Seventh-day Adventist employee had acted in ways inconsistent with the tenets of his religion, for example that he worked five days a week rather than the harvard university application essay, required six, had lied on an employment application, and usc emba essays, took an oath before a notary upon becoming a public employee, can be relevant to the evaluation of sincerity but is harvard university essay prompt, not dispositive); Hansard v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp ., 1973 WL 129 (E.D.

Tex. Feb. 16, 1973) (employee’s contention that he objected to Sunday work for religious reasons was undermined by his very recent history of Sunday work); see also Hussein v. Criminal. Waldorf-Astoria , 134 F. Supp. Harvard Application Prompt. 2d 591 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (employer had a good faith basis to doubt sincerity of employee’s professed religious need to wear a beard because he had not worn a beard at any time in his fourteen years of employment, had never mentioned his religious beliefs to anyone at the hotel, and simply showed up for essays plans work one night and application prompt, asked for an on-the-spot exception to gcse physics coursework the no?beard policy), aff’d , 2002 WL 390437 (2d Cir. Mar. 13, 2002) (unpublished). [37] EEOC v. Ilona of Hungary, Inc ., 108 F.3d 1569 (7th Cir. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. 1997) (en banc) (Jewish employee proved her request for leave to observe Yom Kippur was based on a sincerely held religious belief even though she had never in her prior eight-year tenure sought leave from work for a religious observance, and conceded that she generally was not a very religious person; the evidence showed that certain events in usc emba essays her life, including the birth of her son and the death of harvard university prompt, her father, had strengthened her religious beliefs over the years); Cooper v. Oak Rubber Co ., 15 F.3d 1375 (6th Cir.

1994) (that employee had worked the Friday night shift at plant for essay justice approximately seven months after her baptism did not establish that she did not hold sincere religious belief against working on Saturdays, considering that 17 months intervened before employee was next required to work on Saturday, and employee’s undisputed testimony was that her faith and commitment to her religion grew during this time); EEOC v. IBP, Inc., 824 F. Application. Supp. 147 (C.D. Ill. 1993) (Seventh-day Adventist employee’s previous absence of essays, faith and harvard prompt, subsequent loss of faith did not prove that his religious beliefs were insincere at the time that he refused to work on the Sabbath); s ee also Union Independiente, 279 F.3d at 57 n.8 (the fact that the alleged conflict between plaintiff’s beliefs and union membership kept changing might call into question the sincerity of the for high school seniors, beliefs or “might simply reflect an evolution in plaintiff’s religious views toward a more steadfast opposition to university prompt union membership”). [38] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1; Anderson v. U.S.F. Logistics (IMC), Inc. , 274 F.3d 470, 475 (7th Cir.

2001) (employee’s belief that she needed to use the phrase “Have a Blessed Day” was a religious practice covered by Title VII even though using the phrase was not a requirement of her religion); Rivera v. Choice Courier , 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (the statutory language providing that Title VII encompasses “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief,” means that Title VII “protects more than . . . practices specifically mandated by an employee’s religion”). [39] For the text of sox fatherhood essay, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), which applies to employers, see supra n.4. Under 42 U.S.C. Harvard University Prompt. § 2000e-2(b), it is unlawful for employment agencies to “fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his . Plans. . . religion . Harvard Essay Prompt. . . or to classify or refer for white essay employment any individual on the basis of his . . . religion . Harvard Essay. . Physics Coursework Resistance Wire. . .” Under 42 U.S.C. Harvard University. § 2000e-2(c), it is unlawful for unions to “(1) to usc emba essays exclude or expel from membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of harvard essay, his . . Sox Fatherhood. . Harvard University. religion . . . White Sox Fatherhood. ; (2) to limit, segregate or classify its membership or applicants . . Harvard Application Prompt. . or to refuse to refer for oil drilling employment any individual . . . because of such individual’s . . . Prompt. religion . . . ; or (3) to coursework wire cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate . . . in harvard violation of this section.” [40] See, e.g., Union Independiente, 279 F.3d 49; Bushouse , 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066. Prompts. See infra §§ II, III, and IV; see also § IV-C-5. [41] Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co . Application Prompt. 482 U.S.

656, 668-69 (1987) (unions violated “§ 703(c)(1) [of Title VII, which] makes it an prompts for high school seniors unlawful practice for a Union to ‘exclude or to expel from harvard university its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual’” when they “ignored [racial] discrimination claims . . . , knowing that the employer was discriminating in violation of the contract”). See, e.g., Perugini v. Safeway Stores, 935 F. 2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1991) (remand to white sox fatherhood determine whether union discriminatorily failed to challenge employer’s refusal to application essay give pregnant worker light duty); Rainey v. Town of Warren , 80 F. Supp. 2d 5, 17 (D.R.I. 2000) (“[i]t is axiomatic that a union’s failure to adequately represent union members in the face of employer discrimination may subject the union to essay prompts for high liability under either Title VII or its duty of fair representation”). To the extent it has been held that a union cannot be held liable where it knowingly acquiesces in discrimination, the university application prompt, EEOC disagrees.

See EEOC v. Pipefitters Ass’n Local Union 597 , 334 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2003). [42] Section 702(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1(a), provides: This subchapter shall not apply to . . . For High. a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society with respect to harvard application prompt the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on usc emba essays by such corporation, association, educational institution, or society of its activities. Section 703(e)(2) of university application essay, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Essays Plans. § 2000e-2(e)(2) provides: it shall not be an harvard essay prompt unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university, or educational institution or institution of white, learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the university application essay, curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of white, a particular religion.

While Congress did not include a definition of the § 702(a) term “religious corporation” in Title VII, at least one judge has argued that the legislative history indicates that Congress intended “the § 703(e)(2) exemption to require a lesser degree of association between an entity and a religious sect than what would be required under § 702(a).” See LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Cmty. Application Essay Prompt. Ctr. , 503 F.3d 217, 237 (3d Cir. 2007) (Rendell, J., dissenting). Executive Order 13279, Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations , issued on December 12, 2002, provides that certain faith-based organizations that provide social programs can deliver those services and make hiring decisions on essay the basis of their religious beliefs even if they receive federal funding. See 67 Fed. Reg.

77,141 (12/16/02). Harvard Prompt. The Guidance to Faith-Based and Community Organizations on Partnering with the Federal Government , http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/guidance_document_01-06.pdf (last visited July 2, 2008), issued by the White House Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives, explains that while religious organizations that receive federal funds to provide social services may choose to hire persons of the same religion, they are also subject to white federal, state, and local employment and harvard university application essay prompt, anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII. [43] Townley , 859 F.2d at 618; accord Hall v. Essay Criminal Justice. Baptist Mem. Health Care Corp. , 215 F.3d 618, 624-25 (6th Cir. 2000) (college of health sciences qualified as a religious institution under Title VII because it was an affiliated institution of a church-affiliated hospital, had direct relationship with the Baptist church, and the college atmosphere was permeated with religious overtones). [44] Townley, 859 F.2d at 618; see also Killinger v. Samford Univ. , 113 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1997) (Baptist university was “religious educational institution” where largest single source of funding was state Baptist Convention, all university trustees were Baptists, university reported financially to Convention and to Baptist State Board of university essay, Missions, university was member of usc emba essays, Association of Baptist Colleges and Schools, university charter designated its chief purpose as “the promotion of the Christian Religion throughout the university, world by maintaining and operating institutions dedicated to the development of Christian character in high scholastic standing,” and both Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Education recognized university as religious educational institution).

[45] Townley , 859 F.2d at 619 (manufacturer of mining equipment, whose owners asserted that they made a covenant with God that their business “would be a Christian, faith?operated business,” is not a religious organization because it is for profit; it produces mining equipment, a secular product; it is not affiliated with or supported by essay on the a church; and its articles of incorporation do not mention any religious purpose) . Cf. EEOC v. Kamehameha Sch./Bishop Estate , 990 F.2d 458, 461 (9th Cir. 1993) (non-profit school not “religious” for harvard university prompt Title VII purposes where ownership and affiliation, purpose, faculty, student body, student activities, and gcse, curriculum of the harvard essay, schools are either essentially secular, or neutral as far as religion is concerned). [46] See Corp. of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos , 483 U.S. 327 (1987) (a nonprofit church-run business does not violate Title VII if it refuses to hire anyone other than members of its own religion, even for enterprises or jobs that are not religious in nature). [47] Killinger , 113 F.3d at 200 (School of Divinity need not employ professor who did not adhere to the theology advanced by essay criminal justice its leadership); Tirpanlis v. Unification Theological Seminary , 2001 WL 64739 (S.D.N.Y.

Jan. 24, 2001) (seminary operated by harvard essay prompt Unification Church cannot be sued for prompts for high school religious discrimination by Greek Orthodox employee who was allegedly terminated for refusing to accept the teachings of the Unification Church). [48] Ziv v. Valley Beth Shalom , 156 F.3d 1242 (Table), 1998 WL 482832 (9th Cir. Aug. 11, 1998) (unpublished) (religious organization can be held liable for retaliation and national origin discrimination); DeMarco v. Holy Cross High Sch. Application Prompt. , 4 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 1993) (religious institutions may not engage in age discrimination). [49] EEOC v. On The Criminal Justice. Fremont Christian Sch. Harvard University Application Essay. , 781 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1986) (religious school violated Title VII and the Equal Pay Act when it provided “head of household” health insurance benefits only to single persons and married men). [50] McClure v. Salvation Army , 460 F.2d 553, 558-60 (5th Cir. 1972); s ee also Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc. Physics Resistance Wire. , 474 F.3d 223 (6th Cir.

2007) (applying ministerial exception to bar claim by essay resident in hospital’s pastoral care program who alleged disability discrimination); Tomic v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria , 442 F.3d 1036 (7th Cir. 2006) (applying ministerial exception to bar age discrimination claim brought by Catholic Diocese music director who was terminated following a dispute with the bishop’s assistant regarding what to play during the Easter Mass); Hankins v. Lyght , 441 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2006) (applying ministerial exception to bar age discrimination claim); Combs v. Central Texas Annual Conf. of United Methodist Church, 173 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 1999) (barring claim because court could not determine whether an employment decision concerning a minister was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds without entering the constitutionally impermissible realm of internal church management); EEOC v. Catholic Univ. of America , 83 F.3d 455 (D.C. About Business. Cir. 1996) (ministerial exception barred Title VII sex discrimination claim brought by tenured member of harvard university application essay, Catholic University’s department of religious canon law); DeMarco v. Usc Emba Essays. Holy Cross High School , 4 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 1993) (ministerial exception inapplicable to parochial school teacher’s age discrimination claim because employer’s contention that teacher was terminated specifically for failing to attend Mass and to lead his students in harvard university prompt prayers could be evaluated without risk of for high seniors, excessive entanglement between government and university, religious institution); Guianan v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of white sox fatherhood, Indianapolis, 42 F. Harvard. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D.

Ind. 1998) (ministerial exception inapplicable to parochial school teacher’s age discrimination claim, even though teacher taught at least one class in religion per term, and organized one worship service per month, since vast majority of teacher’s duties involved teaching math, science, and other secular courses). [51] Rayburn v. Gen. Conference of Seventh?Day Adventists , 772 F.2d 1164, 1169 (4th Cir. 1985). [52] Rweyemamu v. Cote , 520 F.3d 198 (2d Cir. 2008) (Title VII race discrimination claim by African-American Catholic priest challenging denial of coursework resistance wire, promotion and subsequent termination was barred by university application essay the ministerial exception); Petruska v. Usc Emba Essays. Gannon Univ. , 462 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2006) (ministerial exception bars Title VII sex discrimination claim by university essay female Catholic chaplain against school, alleging that she was forced out as chaplain after she advocated on for high school behalf of alleged victims of sexual harassment and university application prompt, spoke out against the school’s president regarding alleged sexual harassment and discrimination against female employees); Werft v. Desert Southwest Annual Conf. of the coursework wire, United Methodist Church , 377 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2004) (ministerial exception barred minister’s claim against church for failure to accommodate his disabilities). However, some courts have ruled that the ministerial exception does not bar harassment claims by ministers, but rather only applies to harvard university essay prompt claims involving matters such as hiring, promotion, and termination. See Elvig v. Criminal Justice. Calvin Presbyterian Church , 375 F.3d 951 (9th Cir.

2004) (ministerial exception does not bar sexual harassment claim by minister), reh’g denied , 397 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2005) (two concurring and three dissenting opinions); Bollard v. California Province of the Soc’y of university application prompt, Jesus , 196 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 1999) (novice’s sexual harassment claim could be maintained without excessive entanglement between church and essay criminal, state because religious order did not offer a religious justification for the alleged harassment, and plaintiff did not seek reinstatement or other equitable relief); Dolquist v. Heartland Presbytery, 342 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Kan. 2004) (First Amendment Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses did not preclude minister from pursuing Title VII sexual harassment claim against her church, because claims did not involve choice of clergy); see also Bryce v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of harvard university, Colorado, 289 F.3d 648, 657-59 (10th Cir. 2002) (although “employment decisions may be subject to Title VII scrutiny, where the decision does not involve the church’s spiritual functions,” minister’s Title VII harassment claim was subject to dismissal because it was based on offshore oil drilling communications protected by harvard application prompt the First Amendment under the “church autonomy” doctrine; the doctrine is broader than the essay on the justice, ministerial exception and bars civil court review of internal church disputes involving matters of harvard university essay prompt, doctrine and church governance). [53] Geary v. Visitation of Blessed Virgin Mary Parish Sch. About. , 7 F.3d 324 (3d Cir.

1993) (lay teacher at church?operated elementary school not a minister); Dole v. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. Shenandoah Baptist Church , 899 F.2d 1389 (4th Cir. Oil Drilling Essay. 1990) (lay teachers of private religious schools who “perform no sacerdotal functions [nor] serve as church governors [and] belong to no clearly delineated religious order” are not ministers despite their sincere belief that theirs is a ministry); but see EEOC v. Catholic Univ. of harvard university, America , 83 F.3d 455 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (ministerial exception barred Title VII sex discrimination claim brought by offshore oil drilling tenured member of harvard university application essay prompt, Catholic university’s department of religious canon law). [54] Alicea?Hernandez v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 320 F.3d 698 (7th Cir.

2003) (ministerial exception applied to Communications Director who was responsible for crafting the essays about business, Church’s message to harvard university application essay the Hispanic community); EEOC v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Raleigh, 213 F.3d 795 (4th Cir. Oil Drilling. 2000) (ministerial exception applies to cathedral’s director of music ministry and university essay, part-time music teacher); Rayburn , 772 F.2d at 1168 (ministerial exception applies to usc emba essays associate pastor who had completed seminary training but was not ordained); Starkman v. Evans , 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1999) (ministerial exception barred Americans with Disabilities Act claim by church choir director). [55] EEOC v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary , 651 F.2d 277, 283 (5th Cir. 1981) (“[w]hile religious organizations may designate persons as ministers for their religious purposes free from any governmental interference, bestowal of such a designation does not control their extra?religious legal status”). [56] Abramson v. William Paterson Coll. of university essay, N.J. , 260 F.3d 265, 281 (3d Cir. On The Criminal Justice. 2001) (prima facie case and evidentiary burdens of an harvard essay employee alleging religious discrimination mirror those of an essays business plans employee alleging race or sex discrimination).

A disparate impact analysis could also apply in the religion context, particularly in the area of recruitment and university application essay, hiring. Essays Plans. See, e.g., Barrow v. Greenville Indep. Application Essay Prompt. Sch. Dist. , 480 F.3d 377 (5th Cir. 2007) (affirming summary judgment, citing lack of statistical evidence, for employer on Title VII claim brought by teacher who asserted policy favoring teachers whose children attended the public schools had a disparate impact on those whose children attended private school for religious rather than secular reasons). However, because the reasonable accommodation/undue hardship analysis usually applies when a neutral work rule adversely affects religious practices, s ee infra § IV, disparate impact analysis is seldom if ever used in religion cases. [57] 42 U.S.C. Essay. § 2000e-2(e)(1); see also §§ I-C and II-D of this document. [58] See, e.g., EEOC v. Preferred Mgmt .Corp., 216 F. University Essay Prompt. Supp. 2d 763, 813 (S.D. Usc Emba Essays. Ind. 2002) (telling applicant that “[y]ou damned humanists are ruining the world” and harvard application prompt, will “burn in hell forever” raises reasonable inference that the failure to hire her was unlawfully based on religion).

[60] In Noyes v. Kelly Servs. Inc ., 488 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2007), the plaintiff alleged “reverse religious discrimination” when she was not promoted because she did not follow the religious beliefs of her supervisor and management, who were members of a small religious group and favored and promoted other members of the religious group. The court ruled that while the employee did not adhere to a particular religion, the fact that she did not share the employer’s religious beliefs was the basis for the alleged discrimination against her, and usc emba essays, the evidence was sufficient to create an issue for trial on whether the harvard application essay, employer’s decision to promote another employee was a pretext for religious discrimination. [61] Tincher v. Wal-Mart Stores , 118 F.3d 1125, 1131 (7th Cir. 1997) (reasonable jury could conclude that employer’s articulated reason for the discharge of a Seventh-day Adventist was pretextual and usc emba essays, that the real reason was religious discrimination because of the inconvenience caused by employee’s inability to work on Saturdays); s ee also Campos v. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. City of Blue Springs, 289 F.3d 546 (8th Cir. 2002) (evidence supported religiously motivated constructive discharge based on plaintiff’s Native American spiritual beliefs); EEOC v. University of Chicago Hospitals , 276 F.3d 326 (7th Cir. 2002) (evidence sufficient to proceed to trial in case brought on behalf of recruiter alleging constructive discharge based on her evangelical religious beliefs); Dachman v. Shalala , 2001 WL 533760 (4th Cir.

May 18, 2001) (unpublished) (Orthodox Jewish employee who was treated in the same manner as non-Jewish employees with similar performance and disciplinary records failed to show that she was terminated because of white essay, her religion); Altman v. Minn. Dep’t of Corr. , 251 F.3d 1199, 1203 (8th Cir. 2001) (in case raising both Title VII and First Amendment claims, holding that employer may not discipline employees for religiously based conduct because it is religious in university nature if it permits such conduct by other employees when not motivated by religious beliefs). Usc Emba Essays. However, not all employer decisions affect a term, condition, or privilege of employment as required to be actionable as disparate treatment. See, e.g. , Goldmeier v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 337 F.3d 629 (6th Cir.

2003) (resignation 53 days prior to effective date of employer’s policy that would have posed conflict with employees’ religious beliefs did not constitute constructive discharge); Shabat v. Blue Cross Blue Shield , 925 F. Supp. 977 (W.D.N.Y. University Application Prompt. 1996) (plaintiff’s contention that he received a promotion only by pressuring management did not allege an “adverse” employment action). [62] See infra § IV, Reasonable Accommodation. [63] 42 U.S.C. Coursework Resistance. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (discriminating in hiring, discharge, or otherwise with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment); see also 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(2) (discriminating by university prompt limiting, segregating, or classifying employees or applicants in a way which would deprive or tend to physics deprive employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect employment status); cf. Ansonia Bd. of harvard university essay prompt, Educ. v. Philbrook , 479 U.S. Gcse Resistance. 60, 71 (1986) (a benefit “that is part and parcel of the employment relationship may not be doled out in essay a discriminatory fashion, even if the employer would be free . . . not to provide the benefit at essay, all”) (quoting Hishon v. King Spalding , 467 U.S. 69, 75 (1984)). However, at least one court has held that a private employer providing company resources to application recognized employee “affinity groups” does not violate Title VII by denying this privilege to usc emba essays any group promoting or advocating any religious or political position, where the company excluded not only groups advocating a particular religious position but also those espousing religious indifference or opposition.

See Moranski v. Harvard Application. General Motors Corp. Essay. , 433 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2005). [64] Delelegne v. Kinney Sys., Inc., 2004 WL 1281071 (D. Mass. Harvard Application Essay. June 10, 2004) (Ethiopian Christian parking garage cashier could proceed to trial on white sox fatherhood claims of religious harassment and discriminatory termination where he was not allowed to university prompt bring a Bible to work, pray, or display religious pictures in his booth, while Somali Muslim employees were permitted to take prayer breaks and to on the criminal justice display religious materials in their booths). [65] This fact pattern may also give rise to a denial of accommodation claim. See infra § IV-C-6.

[66] Determining whether religious expression disrupts co-workers or customers is application essay prompt, discussed in §§ III-C and IV-C-6, infra . Additionally, in a government workplace, the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause and on the justice, Establishment Clause may affect the harvard prompt, employer’s or employee’s ability to restrict or engage in religious expression. Usc Emba Essays. See supra nn.11-15 infra nn.201-203 ; see also Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11, at sections 2-B and essay, 2-E, noting implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) for neutral rules that burden religion in the federal workplace. [67] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(g) (permitting covered entities to discharge or refuse to “hire and employ” or refer an individual who does not meet federal security requirements). However, the Commission is essays business, aware of harvard essay prompt, no statute or order that requires or permits distinctions based on religion. See infra § IV-B-5 (discussion of security requirements and essay, Title VII’s accommodation obligation). [69] Compare Abrams v. Baylor Coll. of Med. Harvard University Essay Prompt. , 805 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1986) (being non-Jewish was not a BFOQ for a university which had a contract to supply physicians on usc emba essays rotation at a Saudi Arabian hospital when the hospital presented no evidence to support its contention that Saudi Arabia would actually have refused an harvard application essay entry visa to a Jewish faculty member), and Rasul v. District of Columbia , 680 F. Supp.

436 (D.D.C. White Essay. 1988) (Department of Corrections failed to demonstrate that Protestant religious affiliation was a BFOQ for position as prison chaplain because chaplains were recruited and essay, hired on a facility-wide basis and about business plans, were entrusted with the job of planning, directing, and maintaining a total religious program for all inmates, whatever their respective denominations), with Kern v. Dynalectron Corp ., 577 F. Harvard University Application. Supp. 1196 (N.D. Tex. 1983) (requirement that pilot convert to Islam was a BFOQ which warranted employer’s refusal to hire him, inasmuch as requirement was not based on offshore essay a preference of contractor performing work in Saudi Arabia, but on the fact that non?Muslim employees caught flying into Mecca would, under Saudi Arabian law, be beheaded), aff’d , 746 F.2d 810 (5th Cir. 1984), and Pime v. Loyola Univ. of Chicago , 803 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1986) (although university was not a religious organization under Title VII, the court held that having some Jesuit presence in philosophy department was a BFOQ since university was founded by Jesuits, continues to have Jesuit tradition, and requires all of its undergraduates to take philosophy).

[70] Faragher v. Boca Raton , 524 U.S. Harvard University Essay Prompt. 775, 788 (1998) (harassment claims are actionable on sox fatherhood any of Title VII’s protected bases); Meritor Sav. Harvard University Prompt. Bank, FSB v. Vinson , 477 U.S. Essay On The. 57, 66 (1986) (the same Title VII harassment principle applies whether the university essay, harassment is based on race, national origin, religion, or sex); see also Abramson, 260 F.3d at 276; Hafford v. Seidner , 183 F.3d 506, 512 (6th Cir. 1999); Tillery v. Gcse Physics Coursework. ATSI, Inc. Essay Prompt. , 242 F. Supp. Essays About Business Plans. 2d 1051, 1063 (N.D. Ala. 2003), aff’d , 97 Fed.

Appx. 906 (11th Cir. University Essay. 2004) (Table). [71] See Venters v. City of Delphi , 123 F.3d 956 (7th Cir. 1997) (employee who was terminated after she disagreed with supervisor’s religious beliefs raised a triable Title VII harassment claim based on two separate theories of harassment liability: that a “tangible employment benefit” was conditioned upon usc emba essays acquiescing to her supervisor’s religious beliefs, and university, also that a hostile work environment was created). [72] Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 66 (1986) (prohibition on offshore discrimination “in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” requires employers to harvard university application essay maintain a workplace free from harassment based upon usc emba essays protected status).

[73] See, e.g., Venters , 123 F.3d at 964 (employee established that she was discharged on the basis of application essay, her religion after supervisor, among other things, repeatedly called her “evil” and gcse coursework resistance wire, stated that she had to harvard essay prompt share his Christian beliefs in order to be a good employee). [74] Many of the example’s facts are taken from Sattar v. Motorola, Inc ., 138 F.3d 1164 (7th Cir. For High. 1998). Essay Prompt. However, in Sattar the plaintiff did not prevail because the essays, plaintiff failed to harvard university application prompt prove that his discharge was linked to the harassment by his former supervisor. [75] Pederson v. Casey’s Gen. Stores, Inc. , 978 F. Supp.

926 (D. Neb. 1997) (employer’s refusal to accommodate employee’s need to have Easter day off, while knowing that she could not compromise her religious needs and where it would not have posed an essay criminal undue hardship, amounted to harvard prompt constructive discharge in violation of Title VII). [76] Venters , 123 F.3d at 972 (“the accommodation framework . For High School Seniors. . Essay Prompt. . has no application when the oil drilling essay, employee alleges that he was fired because he did not share or follow his employer’s religious beliefs”). [77] Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788 (environmental harassment claims are actionable on any of Title VII’s protected bases); Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 67 (same); see also EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by harvard university essay Supervisors (1999), available at usc emba essays, https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [78] Harris v. Harvard University Prompt. Forklift Sys., Inc. , 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993). [79] Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 67. [80] Marcus v. West , 2002 WL 1263999, *11 (N.D.

Ill. June 3, 2002) (mistreatment of Sanctified Pentecostal Christian employee was not because of religion; supervisor mistreated all of her employees and had poor management and interpersonal skills). [81] Turner v. Barr , 811 F. Supp. Usc Emba Essays. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1993) (hostile environment created where Jewish employee was subjected to a “joke” about the Holocaust, denied opportunity to work overtime, and ridiculed as a “turnkey”; although the harvard essay prompt, latter two incidents did not refer to religion, the facts showed that he was singled out for such treatment because of his religion). [82] See EEOC v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. , 521 F.3d 306 (4th Cir. 2008) (reversing summary judgment for the employer and remanding the case for white trial, the court ruled that a reasonable fact finder could conclude that a Muslim employee who wore a kufi as part of his religious observance was subjected to hostile work environment religious harassment when fellow employees repeatedly called him “Taliban” and “towel head,” made fun of his appearance, questioned his allegiance to the United States, suggested he was a terrorist, and made comments associating all Muslims with senseless violence); EEOC v. WCM Enter., Inc. , 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2007) (reversing summary judgment for the employer and harvard application essay, remanding the case for trial, the court ruled that a reasonable fact finder could conclude that harassment initiated after September 11, 2001, against a car salesman who was born in India and is a practicing Muslim was severe or pervasive and motivated by his national origin and religion). In Sunbelt , the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held: “we cannot regard as ‘merely offensive,’ and thus ‘beyond Title VII's purview,’ Harris , 510 U.S. at 21, constant and repetitive abuse founded upon misperceptions that all Muslims possess hostile designs against the United States, that all Muslims support jihad, that all Muslims were sympathetic to the 9/11 attack, and that all Muslims are proponents of radical Islam.” 521 F.3d at usc emba essays, 318. [83] See Abramson, 260 F.3d at 279 (supervisor’s criticism of professor’s refusal to work on her Sabbath, scheduling meetings on Jewish holidays, and charging her for leave on those holidays could be found to have “infected [professor’s] work experience” because of her religion). [84] Henson v. Harvard Application. City of Dundee , 682 F.2d 897, 903 (11th Cir.

1982). [86] See WCM Enter. Essay. , 496 F.3d at 400-01 (plaintiff’s religious and national origin harassment claim was based on having been referred to essay prompt as a “Muslim extremist,” and constantly called “Taliban” among other terms); Khan v. United Recovery Sys., Inc., 2005 WL 469603 (S.D. Gcse Coursework Resistance. Tex. 2005) (plaintiff’s religious harassment claim was based on alleged comments by co-worker that court characterized as “malicious and vitriolic,” including that all Muslims are terrorists who should be killed, that he wished “all these Muslims were wiped off the face of the earth,” that plaintiff might get shot for wearing an “Allah” pendant, and questioning plaintiff about what was being taught at her mosque and whether it was “connected with terrorists”; in addition, plaintiff alleged that her supervisor placed newspaper articles on university application prompt her desk about mosques in Afghanistan that taught terrorism, along with a note telling her to come into his office and justify such activity). [87] Human resources professionals who responded to a survey by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and essay for high school, the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding reported that 19% of the employees in harvard application prompt their organizations engaged in proselytizing to on the criminal co-workers. While 32% of the employees perceived increased cooperation and communication within their organizations due to harvard acceptance of religious diversity, 9% of the employees felt harassed by co-workers who expressed their religious beliefs.

Religion in offshore the Workplace Survey, at 24 (Society for Human Resource Management, 2001) (executive summary and information on obtaining report available at http://www.tanenbaum.org/research.html (last visited July 2, 2008)). [88] Venters , 123 F.3d at application prompt, 976 (because the employee made clear her objection to the comments by telling her supervisor he had “crossed the line,” she established that the comments were unwelcome). [89] Id. (“whatever questions there might have been as to whether Venters welcomed these discussions were answered as of th[e] date [that she told him he had crossed the line]”). [90] Harris , 510 U.S. at 21-22; Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788 (“We have made it clear that conduct must be extreme to amount to a change in the terms and conditions of employment.”). [91] Faragher , 524 U.S. at 787-88; Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs. , 523 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1998) (“[t]he real social impact of workplace behavior often depends on a constellation of surrounding circumstances, expectations, and relationships which are not fully captured by a simple recitation of the words used or the usc emba essays, physical acts performed”); Harris , 510 U.S. at 23.

[92] Bains LLC v. Arco Prods. Co ., 405 F.3d 74 (9th Cir. 2005) (upholding finding of liability for harvard university application prompt harassment in usc emba essays violation of university application, 42 U.S.C. Essay Prompts Seniors. § 1981 where Sikh employees were regularly called “rag-heads” and university application prompt, “towel-heads,” and were asked to essay school clean up fuel spills with their turbans). [93] Williams v. Gen. Motors Corp ., 187 F.3d 553, 564 (6th Cir. 1999) (“a work environment viewed as a whole may satisfy the legal definition of an abusive work environment, for purposes of university essay, a hostile environment claim, even though no single episode crosses the Title VII threshold”). [94] Jones v. United Space Alliance , 2006 WL 250761 (11th Cir. Feb. 3, 2006) (unpublished) (plaintiff, a member of the offshore oil drilling, Apostolic/Pentecostal faith, alleged that he was subjected to a hostile work environment based on religion when his manager made derogatory remarks to him based on his religion, a co-worker removed from the community bulletin board a flyer describing events at the plaintiff’s church, the plaintiff’s manager told him to remove the harvard university application essay, lanyard for his identification badge because it had “Jesus” on sox fatherhood essay it, his manager told him not to leave his Bible on his desk, he was asked to turn down the religious music that he played at work, and he was accused of having a conflict of interest with the space program because he was a pastor; in finding there was insufficient evidence of a hostile work environment, court ruled that the alleged incidents were not objectively severe or pervasive because none occurred on a repeated basis, none were physically threatening or humiliating, and none interfered with the harvard university prompt, plaintiff’s job performance).

[95] EEOC v. AKZ Mgmt., Inc. , Civil Action No. 07-8356 (S.D.N.Y. consent decree filed Sept. 26, 2007) (settlement of essay, religious harassment and disparate treatment claims on behalf of employees who were pressured by management to practice or conform to Scientology). See Johnson v. Spencer Press of Maine, Inc ., 364 F.3d 368 (1st Cir. 2004) (jury properly found harassment was severe and pervasive where supervisor repeatedly insulted plaintiff and prompt, mocked his religious beliefs, and threatened him with violence); Sattar , 138 F.3d at 1167 (employee harassed with a barrage of offshore oil drilling, e-mails with dire warnings of the university essay prompt, divine punishments that awaited those who refuse to follow Islam) ; Preferred Mgmt. Corp ., 216 F. Prompts For High School. Supp. Essay Prompt. 2d 763 (Christian employer violated Title VII by requiring employees to conform to her views). [96] Harris , 510 U.S. at about business plans, 21; Meritor , 477 U.S. at 64.

[97] Harris , 510 U.S. at 22 (“even without regard to harvard prompt these tangible effects, the offshore, very fact that the discriminatory conduct was so severe or pervasive that it created a work environment abusive to employees because of university essay prompt, their race, gender, religion, or national origin offends Title VII’s broad rule of criminal justice, workplace equality . . . . Certainly Title VII bars conduct that would seriously affect a reasonable person’s psychological well?being, but the statute is not limited to such conduct”); s ee Dey v. Essay. Colt Const. Essay Prompts. Dev. Co ., 28 F.3d 1446, 1454-55 (7th Cir. 1994) (“The mention in university application prompt Harris of an unreasonable interference with work performance was not intended to penalize the employee who possesses the dedication and offshore oil drilling, fortitude to harvard university prompt complete her assigned tasks even in the face of offensive and usc emba essays, abusive [conduct] . . . . As Justice Scalia separately explained in Harris , the test under Title VII ‘is not whether work has been impaired, but whether working conditions have been discriminatorily altered.’”) (citation omitted). [98] See Harris , 510 U.S. at 23 (“whether an environment is ‘hostile’ or ‘abusive’ can be determined only by looking at all the circumstances . . . Harvard. ; no single factor is required”). [99] Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788 (citing Oncale , 523 U.S. at 80); Sheikh v. Indep.

Sch. Essay Prompts School Seniors. Dist. 535 , 2001 WL 1636504 (D. Minn. Oct. 18, 2001) (a Muslim employee who was ostracized by colleagues because he refused to shake hands with female colleagues did not suffer a materially adverse change in the terms and harvard university prompt, conditions of employment). [100] See Marcus , 2002 WL 1263999 at *11 (asking very religious employee to swear on a Bible to resolve differences with a colleague and telling her that people did not like her “church lady act” are isolated incidents that were not severe or pervasive enough to essay criminal justice create a hostile work environment); Sublett v. Edgewood Universal Cabling Sys., Inc. Harvard Application. , 194 F. Supp. Essays About Business. 2d 692, 703 (S.D. Ohio 2002) (supervisor’s single comment to Rastafarian employee that “those dread things” made him look too “radical” was not sufficiently severe to create a hostile environment). [101] Cf.

Tessler v. KHOW Radio, Inc. , 1997 WL 458489 at *8 (D. Colo. Apr. 21, 1997). [102] Cf. Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 656-57 (it did not pose an undue hardship for employer to accommodate supervisor’s sporadic and prompt, voluntary prayers during workplace meetings). [103] Williams , 187 F.3d at essays business plans, 563 (in determining whether the university application essay, alleged conduct rises to the level of severe or pervasive, a court should consider the factual “totality of the circumstances”; using a “holistic perspective is essay for high, necessary, keeping in mind that each successive episode has its predecessors, that the impact of the separate incidents may accumulate, and that the work environment created thereby may exceed the sum of the prompt, individual episodes”). [104] Cf . Physics Coursework Resistance Wire. Johnson v. Spencer Press of Maine, Inc. , 364 F.3d 368 (1st Cir.

2004) (affirming jury verdict for plaintiff on application essay religious harassment claim, court noted that plaintiff testified supervisor who made ongoing derogatory remarks about plaintiff’s religion also once put the point of a knife under plaintiff’s chin, in addition to threatening to kill him with a hand grenade, run him over with a car, and shoot him with a bow and essay, arrow). [105] As with any harassment claim, employer liability will depend on essay prompt whether the employee can show, in a case of co-worker harassment, that the employer knew or should have known of the physics resistance, misconduct and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action. Additionally, in the case of harassment by non-employees, employer liability will depend on whether the employer had control over such individuals’ misconduct. For standards regarding liability for harassment by supervisors, see EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [106] See Peters v. Renaissance Hotel Operating Co. , 307 F.3d 535 (7th Cir. 2002) (the impact of actions not directed at a complaining employee is not as great as the impact of harassment directed at him and the combined impact of all the university application essay, comments was not severe or pervasive enough to create an unlawful hostile environment). [107] Burlington Indus., Inc. Prompts For High. v. Ellerth , 524 U.S. 742, 762 (1998); Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788; Preferred Mgmt. University. Corp. Physics Coursework Wire. , 216 F. Harvard. Supp. 2d at 839 n.25 (employer’s anti-harassment policy was inadequate because it did not include a prohibition on religious harassment, employer did not provide training on religious harassment, and managers responded to complaints of essay on the criminal, religious harassment by requiring employees to participate in university application essay a training program based on religious principles). However, under agency principles an employer is automatically liable for hostile work environment harassment even if it does not result in coursework a tangible employment action if “the agent’s high rank in the company makes him or her the employer’s alter ego.” Ellerth , 524 U.S. at harvard application essay prompt, 758.

If the harasser is of a sufficiently high rank to fall “within that class of an employer organization’s officials who may be treated as the white essay, organization’s proxy,” which would include officials such as a company president, owner, partner, or corporate officer, the harassment is automatically imputed to the employer and no affirmative defense can be raised. Faragher , 524 U.S. at 789 see also EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [108] Sheikh , 2001 WL 1636504 at *5 (employer not liable because it took steps to stop alleged harassment of Muslim employee by his co-workers); see Guidelines on Discrimination Because of National Origin , 29 C.F.R. § 1606.8(d) (employer liable for co-worker harassment about which it knew or should have known and failed to act). [109] Cf. Powell v. Yellow Book USA, Inc. , 445 F.3d 1074 (8th Cir. 2006) (employer not liable for religious harassment of plaintiff because upon harvard university application essay prompt learning of her complaints about a co-worker’s proselytizing, the employer promptly held a meeting and told the co-worker to stop discussing religion matters with plaintiff, and gcse physics resistance wire, there was evidence that the company continued to monitor the harvard university essay prompt, situation to ensure that the co-worker did not resume her proselytizing). [110] 29 C.F.R. § 1606.8(e). Berry v. Delta Airlines, Inc. , 260 F.3d 803 (7th Cir.

2001) (employer not liable for alleged sexual harassment of its female employee by a male contractor because it promptly investigated the essay, allegations, requested a change in the contractor’s shift so that he would not have contact with the employee, and asked that all contractors be required to view sexual harassment training video). [111] When asked whether they had discussed religion in application essay the workplace in the past twenty-four hours, 48% of Americans answered yes. See George Gallup, Jr. Timothy Jones, The Next American Spirituality: Finding God in the Twenty-First Century , at 72 (Cook Communication Ministries 2000). [112] Employers are permitted to seniors exercise their religion to the extent that such exercise does not infringe on their employees’ religious beliefs. Townley , 859 F.2d at 621 (“Where the religious practices of employers . . . and employees conflict, Title VII does not, and could not, require individual employers to abandon their religion. Rather, Title VII attempts to reach a mutual accommodation of the conflicting religious practices.”). [113] In a survey conducted by harvard university application essay prompt the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 66% of employees surveyed reported that they had witnessed religious discrimination in the workplace. Religious Bias in the Workplace: The Employee’s View (Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 1999) (executive summary available at http://www.tanenbaum.org/research_1999.html ) (last visited July 2, 2008).

[114] See Examples 15, 18-19, 27-28, 49-50. For a further discussion of the circumstances under which reasonable accommodation of religious expression in offshore oil drilling the workplace, including proselytizing, may be denied because it poses an university application undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business, see infra § IV-C-6. [115] Cf. Bodett v. CoxCom, Inc. , 366 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. For High School. 2004) (employer prevailed on claim brought by terminated employee for application essay prompt disparate treatment based on religion; employee’s violation of employer’s anti-harassment policy was a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for termination, even if the violations were motivated by the employee’s religious beliefs). [116] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j); Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(b). [117] Compare Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 84 (1977) (interpreting Title VII “undue hardship” standard, with 42 U.S.C. § 12111(10)(A) (defining ADA “undue hardship” standard); see infra n.139. [118] Protos v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 797 F.2d 129, 136 (3d Cir.

1986) (“[t]his is usc emba essays, . . . part of our ‘happy tradition’ of university essay, avoiding unnecessary clashes with the dictates of coursework resistance wire, conscience”) (citation omitted). [119] See Seshadri v. Kasraian , 130 F.3d 798, 800 (7th Cir. Harvard Application Prompt. 1997) (employee who seeks accommodation need not belong to an established church but cannot preclude inquiry into whether he has a religion); Chrysler Corp. Gcse Coursework Resistance Wire. v. Mann , 561 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir. Harvard University Prompt. 1977) (observing that the plaintiff “did little to acquaint Chrysler with his religion and its potential impact upon his ability to perform his job”); s ee also Redmond , 574 F.2d at 902 (relying on Mann , concluding that “an employee who is disinterested in informing his employer of his religious needs ‘may forego the right to have his beliefs accommodated by his employer’”). [120] See Heller , 8 F.3d at sox fatherhood essay, 1439 (employee’s request for leave to participate in religious conversion ceremony of his wife and children was sufficient to place employer on notice that this was pursuant to university prompt a religious practice or belief; an employer need have “only enough information about an employee's religious needs to permit the employer to understand the existence of a conflict between the employee's religious practices and wire, the employer's job requirements”); Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 654 (even though employee did not explicitly ask for a religious accommodation, court held employer was on notice of the need for accommodation given that it reprimanded employee for engaging in harvard application known religious activities); Hellinger v. Eckerd Corp., 67 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 1999) (although applicant did not himself inform employer about his religious conflict on his job application, employer had learned when he contacted applicant’s former supervisor for a reference that the applicant had refused to sell condoms at prior job due to a religious objection, and usc emba essays, was therefore on notice); cf. Wessling , 554 F. Supp. at 552 (employee’s request to leave work early in order to harvard university application arrive early for a Christmas play at her church in order to decorate and receive children was insufficient to about plans place her employer on notice of a religious practice; it was more in the nature of a social activity or family obligation that happened to be associated with the church). [121] Cary v. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. Carmichael, 908 F. Supp.

1334 (E.D. Va. 1995), aff’d , 116 F.3d 472 (4th Cir. Gcse Physics Coursework. 1997); see also Elmenayer v. Harvard. ABF Freight Sys. Essay Criminal. , 2001 WL 1152815 (E.D.N.Y. University Application Essay. Sept. 20, 2001) (employer not liable for usc emba essays disciplining employee for university application essay prompt tardiness where employee failed until after his discharge to explain that tardiness was because he attended a prayer service), aff’d on other grounds , 318 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2003). [122] Notwithstanding the different legal standards for prompts for high seniors determining when a failure to accommodate poses an undue hardship under Title VII and the ADA, see supra n.117, courts have endorsed a cooperative information-sharing process between employer and university application, employee, similar to the “interactive process” used for disability accommodation requests under the ADA. See, e.g., Thomas v. Nat’l Ass’n of Letter Carriers , 225 F.3d 1149, 1155 n.5 (10th Cir. Usc Emba Essays. 2000) (“the [ADA] ‘interactive process’ rationale is equally applicable to the obligation to harvard prompt offer a reasonable accommodation to about an individual whose religious beliefs conflict with an employment requirement”); Elmenayer , 2001 WL 1152815, at *5 (same), aff’d on other grounds , 318 F.3d 130 ; Kenner v. Domtar Indus., Inc ., 2006 WL 662466 (W.D.

Ark. Harvard Essay Prompt. Mar. 13, 2006) (“Title VII’s reasonable accommodation provisions contemplate an interactive process, with cooperation between the employer and sox fatherhood, the employee, but which must be initiated by the employer”); Cosme v. Henderson , 2000 WL 1682755, *6 (S.D.N.Y. University Application Essay. Nov. 9, 2000) (“[t]he process of finding a reasonable [religious] accommodation is intended to be an interactive process in which both the employer and employee participate”), aff’d , 287 F.3d 152 (3d Cir. 2002); cf. Ansonia Bd. of essays about plans, Educ. , 479 U.S. at 69 (“courts have noted that ‘bilateral cooperation is appropriate in the search for an acceptable reconciliation of the needs of the university application prompt, employee’s religion and the exigencies of the employer’s business’”) (quoting Brener v. Diagnostic Ctr. Hosp. , 671 F.2d 141, 145-46 (5th Cir. Usc Emba Essays. 1982)). [123] EEOC v. Arlington Transit Mix, Inc ., 957 F.2d 219, 222 (6th Cir.

1991) (“[a]fter failing to pursue [a voluntary waiver of harvard essay, seniority rights] or any other reasonable accommodation, the company is in no position to argue that it was unable to on the criminal justice accommodate reasonably [plaintiff’s] religious needs without undue hardship on harvard university application essay prompt the conduct of its business”); EEOC v. Ithaca Indus., Inc. Usc Emba Essays. , 849 F.2d 116 (4th Cir. 1988) (employer’s failure to attempt to accommodate violated Title VII). [124] Shelton v. Univ. of Med. Dentistry of harvard university, N.J. , 223 F.3d 220, 227 (3d Cir. 2000) (by refusing to meet with employer’s human resources department, employee failed to satisfy her duty to cooperate in finding a reasonable accommodation). [125] Ansonia Bd. of essay on the criminal, Educ. , 479 U.S. at harvard application, 69 (employer could satisfy its obligation by gcse resistance wire offering an alternative reasonable accommodation to harvard application essay the particular one proposed by the employee); Brener , 671 F.2d at 146 (“employee has a correlative duty to make a good faith attempt to satisfy his needs through means offered by the employer”); EEOC v. AutoNation USA Corp ., 2002 WL 31650749 (9th Cir.

Nov. 22, 2002) (unpublished) (employer satisfied its initial burden by showing that it suggested possible accommodations but that the employee short-circuited the process by resigning without first giving the proposed accommodations the opportunity to be implemented or tested); Chrysler Corp. v. Mann , 561 F.2d 1282, 1286 (8th Cir. For High School Seniors. 1977) (where employee “will not attempt to university prompt accommodate his own beliefs through the means already available to him or cooperate with his employer in offshore its conciliatory efforts, he may forego the right to have his beliefs accommodated”), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1039 (1978). [126] See also Bushouse , 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066. [127] Id. at 1078 n.18 (court held that union’s refusal to provide accommodation unless employee produced independent corroboration that his accommodation request was motivated by a sincerely held religious belief did not violate Title VII’s religious accommodation provision, but cautioned that the holding was limited to harvard university application essay prompt “the facts and circumstances of the offshore oil drilling, present case” and that “the inquiry [into sincerity] and scope of that inquiry will necessarily vary based upon the individual requesting corroboration and the facts and harvard university application prompt, circumstances of the request”).

[128] EEOC v. Tyson Foods, Inc ., Civil Action No. 99-5126 (W.D. Ark. Essays Business Plans. consent decree entered Aug. 14, 2000) (settlement of Title VII challenge to employer’s policy of requiring a letter from university essay a church in support of sox fatherhood essay, all accommodation requests). [129] See EEOC v. Ilona of Hungary, Inc. University Application Essay. , 108 F.3d 1569 (7th Cir. 1997) (employer did not satisfy reasonable accommodation requirement by offering to let Jewish employees take off a day other than Yom Kippur, because that would not eliminate the oil drilling essay, conflict between religion and work); Shelton , 223 F.3d at 225 (citing Ansonia Bd. of Educ ., 479 U.S. at 68-69) (employer’s accommodation of university, granting unpaid leave for offshore religious observance instead of allowing use of paid personal days provided for in collective bargaining agreement (CBA), was a reasonable accommodation as long as use of the paid days was not allowed for all purposes other than religious ones); cf. Bruff v. N. Mississippi Health Serv., Inc., 244 F.3d 495 (5th Cir.

2001) (hospital offered reasonable accommodation as a matter of law where it offered plaintiff who could not be accommodated in her current position thirty days and the assistance of its in-house employment counselor to find another position where the conflict between the duties and religious beliefs could be eliminated or reduced); EEOC v. Universal Mfg. Corp ., 914 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1990) (employer’s offer of five working days off or alternatively seven days off if employee worked one shift within that seven days, did not satisfy obligation to harvard university application prompt offer reasonable accommodation of her religious practice of refraining from work during seven-day religious festival, where employer did not show undue hardship). [130] See infra nn.131-133. Under the essay, Commission’s approach, a reasonable accommodation must eliminate the conflict between work and religion unless such accommodation would impose an undue hardship, i.e. , more than de minimis cost or disruption on harvard university essay the employer’s business. Some courts have approached the issue of what is usc emba essays, a reasonable accommodation in a manner that conflicts with longstanding Commission and judicial precedent. See, e.g., EEOC v. Firestone Fibers Textiles Co. , 515 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2008) (analyzing reasonableness of harvard application prompt, proposed accommodation based on facts typically considered as part of undue hardship analysis); Sturgill v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Essay. , 512 F.3d 1024 (8th Cir. Application Essay Prompt. 2008) (noting that terminology which describes a reasonable accommodation as one that eliminates any work-religion conflict is imprecise, because it may incorrectly imply that reasonableness is determined as a matter of gcse physics coursework resistance wire, law without regard to the facts of an individual case, or that an harvard university application essay prompt employer is coursework resistance, not permitted to choose among alternative accommodations, or that even accommodations which conflict with a CBA or otherwise pose an university undue hardship must be granted). The Commission’s approach is more straightforward and more in keeping with the purpose of Title VII’s accommodation requirement. Concerns about issues such as conflicts with a union contract or burdens on other employees’ settled expectations can and on the justice, should be addressed in the context of whether or not it would impose an university essay prompt undue hardship.

Moreover, the employer need not grant an employee’s requested reasonable accommodation if the employer wishes instead to physics coursework resistance wire offer an alternative accommodation of university essay prompt, its own choosing that also would eliminate the work-religion conflict and does not adversely affect the white, employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. [131] In Ansonia Bd. of Educ., 479 U.S. at university application essay, 68-69, the Court held that an usc emba essays employer has met its obligation under § 701(j) of Title VII when it demonstrates that it has offered a reasonable accommodation to the employee; “where the employer has already reasonably accommodated the application prompt, employee’s religious needs, the statutory inquiry is at an end. The employer need not further show that each of the employee’s alternative accommodations would result in undue hardship.” Cf. About Business Plans. Opuku?Boateng v. Harvard University Application Prompt. California, 95 F.3d 1461 (9th Cir. 1996) (where employer offered no accommodation and employee offered several possibilities, such as scheduling him instead for other equally undesirable shifts and essay prompts school, adopting a system of university prompt, voluntary or mandatory shift trades, the employer had to accept one of the employee’s proposals unless doing so would create an undue hardship). This section addresses only whether the accommodation was reasonable. An employer that does not provide a reasonable accommodation may nevertheless avoid liability if it shows that providing the accommodation would pose an undue hardship. Undue hardship is addressed below in § IV.B. [132] Ansonia Bd. of Educ. , 479 U.S. at 70-71 (“requiring [an employee] to take unpaid leave for justice holy day observance rather than use personal paid leave days provided for under CBA would generally be a reasonable accommodation” because it has “no direct effect upon either employment opportunities or job status,” but “unpaid leave is not a reasonable accommodation when paid leave is provided for all purposes except religious ones . . Application. . [s]uch an arrangement would display a discrimination against religious practices that is the antithesis of reasonableness”).

In cases involving requests for schedule changes or leave as an accommodation, an employer does not have to provide paid leave as an accommodation beyond that otherwise available to the employee, but may have to provide unpaid leave as an accommodation if it would not pose an undue hardship. [133] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c)(2)(ii) (“when there is about, more than one means of accommodation that would not cause undue hardship, the essay, employer or labor organization must offer the alternative which least disadvantages the individual’s employment opportunities”). The Commission’s guidelines do not require an employer to accept any alternative favored by the employee, and, thus, are not inconsistent with Ansonia . In fact, the offshore essay, Court in Ansonia recognized that the limitation in the Commission’s guidelines that alternatives must be considered if they will not “disadvantage an individual’s employment opportunities” distinguished the Commission’s position from the position of the Second Circuit that was rejected in Ansonia . Prompt. 470 U.S. at 69 n.6. Appellate courts in the wake of Ansonia have, as the Commission’s guidelines instruct, evaluated whether employer accommodations had a negative impact on offshore essay the individual’s employment opportunities. See Cosme v. Henderson , 287 F.3d 152, 160 (2d Cir. Harvard University Application Essay. 2002) (an accommodation might be unreasonable if it imposes a “significant work-related burden on the employee without justification”); Wright v. Runyon , 2 F.3d 214, 217 (7th Cir. 1993) (whether an accommodation is reasonable requires a more searching inquiry if an employee, “in order to essay seniors accommodate his religious practices, had to accept a reduction in university application essay pay or some other loss of benefits”). [134] Smith v. Pyro Mining Co. Essay Prompts School. , 827 F.2d 1081, 1085 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting Redmond , 574 F.2d at 902-03). [135] Baker v. Application Essay Prompt. Home Depot , 445 F.3d 541 (2d Cir.

2006) (employer’s offer to schedule employee to work in the afternoon or evenings on physics coursework resistance wire Sundays, rather than the harvard application, mornings, was not a “reasonable” accommodation under Title VII where employee’s religious views required not only attending Sunday church services but also refraining from usc emba essays work on Sundays). [136] Wilshin v. Allstate Ins. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. Co., 212 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Ga. 2002) (employer satisfied obligation to accommodate employee’s Saturday Sabbath observance by offering Sunday work hours instead, notwithstanding that employee would have preferred weekday hours). [137] Shelton , 223 F.3d at 226 (state hospital’s offer to transfer nurse to newborn intensive care unit was reasonable accommodation for her religious beliefs which prevented her from assisting in emergency procedures to terminate pregnancies, where nurse presented no evidence that transfer would affect her salary or benefits); see also Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F.3d 771 (7th Cir.

1998) (city’s offer to white essay allow police officer to exercise his right under CBA to transfer to a district with no abortion clinics resolved his religious objection to harvard university application essay prompt being assigned to guard such facilities; Title VII did not compel employer to instead grant his preferred accommodation of remaining in essay for high school his district but being relieved of essay prompt, such assignments); Wright , 2 F.3d at 217 (7th Cir. 1993) (employer reasonably accommodated employee by suggesting he exercise his rights under CBA to bid on jobs that would have eliminated the essay for high seniors, conflict between work and religion). [138] Townley , 859 F.2d at essay, 614 n.5 (citing Am. Postal Workers Union v. Postmaster , 781 F.2d 772, 774?75 (9th Cir. 1986)); see also Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 1996 WL 22964, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Essay School Seniors. Jan. 12, 1996) (rejecting employer’s argument that a threat of adverse action is not enough to state a claim; “it is nonsensical to suggest that an employee who, when forced by his employer to choose between his job and his faith, elects to avoid potential financial and/or professional damage by acceding to his employer’s religiously objectionable demands has not been the application, victim of religious discrimination”).

Moreover, a denial of accommodation claim can be brought if the white sox fatherhood, employer could have provided an accommodation absent undue hardship that did not disadvantage a term, condition, or privilege of application essay prompt, employment, but did not do so. For example, if a Muslim employee is transferred to non-customer service position because she refuses to usc emba essays stop wearing a religiously mandated headscarf, she states a claim for denial of accommodation under Title VII. Draper v. Harvard University Application Essay. U.S. Pipe Foundry Co. Essay On The Criminal Justice. , 527 F.2d 515 (6th Cir. Harvard. 1975) (resorting to transfer where accommodation was possible in employee’s current position is actionable as denial of reasonable accommodation). However, an employer need not accommodate an gcse resistance employee who chooses to resign before notifying the employer of the need for accommodation or fails to cooperate with the employer in harvard the accommodation process. See, e.g., Goldmeier v. Usc Emba Essays. Allstate Ins. Co. , 337 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2003) (resignation 53 days prior to effective date of harvard university essay prompt, employer’s policy that would have posed conflict with employees’ religious beliefs did not constitute constructive discharge); Lawson v. Sox Fatherhood Essay. Washington , 296 F.3d 799 (9th Cir. 2002) (Jehovah’s Witness who quit state patrol rather than salute the flag or take an oath in harvard university application violation of his religious beliefs was not constructively discharged and thus was not subject to an adverse employment action where, rather than request accommodation, he informed employer that he was resigning due to prompts for high seniors his religious conflict); Shelton v. Univ. of Med.

Dentistry of N.J. Essay Prompt. , 223 F.3d 220, 227 (3d Cir. 2000) (employee who refused to meet with employer’s human resources department to pursue alternative accommodations could not argue that accommodation employer offered was not reasonable). [139] Townley , 859 F.2d at 614 n.5 ; Rodriguez, 1996 WL 22964. [140] Cooper , 15 F.3d at 1379 (Seventh-day Adventist employee’s need for accommodation to observe Sabbath had changed in the 17 months since employer had last scheduled her to work on a Friday night or Saturday; her “undisputed testimony was that her faith and prompts school seniors, commitment to her religion grew during this time”). [141] See, e.g., Hardison, 432 U.S. at 84. This “more than de minimis ” Title VII undue hardship standard is substantially lower than the ADA undue hardship standard, which requires employers to show that the accommodation would cause “significant difficulty or expense.” [142] Both the harvard university application, statute, at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j), and the Commission Guidelines , at 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(b), require an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee’s or applicant’s religious beliefs and practices “unless the employer demonstrates” that doing so would pose an undue hardship. Even under the Fourth Circuit’s decision in EEOC v. Firestone , and the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Sturgill v. United Parcel Service , where courts focused on reasonableness before looking at plans, undue hardship, the employer still has the burden of persuasion. University. Firestone , 515 F.3d at 315; Sturgill , 512 F.3d at 1033 n.4. [143] Tooley v. Martin Marietta Corp. On The Criminal. , 648 F.2d 1239, 1243 (9th Cir. 1981).

[144] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e). [145] Compare Cooper , 15 F.3d at 1380(employee’s request not to be scheduled for harvard application essay Saturday work due to Sabbath observance posed undue hardship for employer because it would have required hiring an additional worker), and Beadle v. Tampa , 42 F.3d 633 (11th Cir. 1995) (requiring police department to alter training program schedule involving more than 900 employees to accommodate one employee’s religious needs amounts to more than de minimis cost and thus undue hardship), with Protos , 797 F.2d 129 (employee’s request not to be scheduled for Saturday work due to Sabbath observance did not pose undue hardship where employer made no showing that efficiency, production, or quality would be affected and entire assembly line remained intact notwithstanding employee’s Saturday absences). [146] See Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 601 F.2d 956, 960 (8th Cir. On The. 1979) (“projected ‘theoretical’ future effects cannot outweigh the undisputed fact that no monetary costs and de minimis efficiency problems were actually incurred during the three month period in university application essay prompt which [employee] was accommodated”); EEOC v. Prompts For High. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC , 432 F. Essay. Supp. 2d 1006 (D. Usc Emba Essays. Ariz. 2006) (employer incorrectly believed that if it allowed plaintiff to wear her religious headscarf it could not enforce its uniform policy with respect to other employees, and failed to harvard university essay show undue hardship based on its fear that allowing the accommodation would open “the floodgates to usc emba essays others violating the uniform policy”).

[147] Tooley , 648 F.2d at 1243 (“undue hardship cannot be supported by merely conceivable or hypothetical hardships . . . . The magnitude as well as the fact of harvard application essay, hardship must be determined by ‘actual imposition on co-workers or disruption of the work routine’”) (quoting Anderson v. Gen. White Sox Fatherhood Essay. Dynamics Convair Aerospace Div. , 589 F.2d 397, 406-07 (9th Cir. 1978)); EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC , 432 F. Supp. Harvard University Application Prompt. 2d at 1016 (“‘hypothetical hardships’” based on assumptions or “pure speculation” about accommodations which have never been put into practice are insufficient to show undue hardship”). [149] Id. Usc Emba Essays. Compare EEOC and Electrolux Reach Voluntary Resolution in Class Religious Accommodation Case (press release available at harvard university essay, https://www.eeoc.gov/press/9-24-03.html, Sept. 24, 2003) (settlement whereby employer agreed to accommodate the religious request of 165 Somali workers who, pursuant to the tenets of the Islamic faith, must offer at usc emba essays, least five daily prayers, two of which must be observed within a restricted time period of between one and two hours) with Farah v. Essay. Whirlpool Corp ., 3:02cv424 (M.D.

Tenn. Oct. 16, 2004) (jury verdict entered in favor of employer, which argued that allowing 40 Muslim factory workers to take a break from the line for their sunset prayers at the same time would result in an undue hardship because as a result of their absence, the physics resistance, line would have to be shut down). [150] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1). Under Title VII, for example, in Hardison , the payment of overtime (or premium pay) to another employee so that plaintiff could be off for weekly religious observance was an undue hardship. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. Id . By contrast, infrequent pay of premium wages for an occasional religious observance is not “more than de minimis .” See, e.g., EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Gcse Resistance. LP , 2007 WL 2891379 (E.D. Application Essay Prompt. Ark. Essays About Business. Oct. 3, 2007) (summary judgment for employer denied on university essay prompt claim by two employees that they were improperly denied leave for an annual religious observance that would have required company to pay two other workers overtime wages of approximately $220 each to fill in, where the facility routinely paid technicians overtime, the employer failed to business contact the union about harvard application, possible accommodation, the usc emba essays, policy providing for only one technician on leave per harvard prompt, day was not always observed, and justice, there was no evidence that customer service needs actually went unmet on the day at application, issue) (jury verdict for plaintiffs subsequently entered), appeal docketed , Case No.

08-1096 (8th Cir. filed Jan. Essays Business Plans. 10, 2008); Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp. , 601 F.2d at 959-60 (no more than de minimis cost imposed by allowing employee to leave work at Sundown on essay prompt Friday where he did not receive any pay for the time missed, a replacement worker was readily available to fill in for essay for high him on application prompt the shift during the hours he missed because the gcse coursework resistance, company maintained “extra board men” who were at university essay, all times available to replace unscheduled absences of regular employees); Burns v. S. Pac. Usc Emba Essays. Transp. Co. Application Prompt. , 589 F.2d 403, 407 (9th Cir. 1978) (excusing employee from paying his monthly $19 union dues due to physics resistance religious objection did not pose an undue hardship, where one union officer testified that the loss “wouldn’t affect us at all”; the loss was also de minimis because “even if so necessary to university application prompt its fiscal well?being that its equivalent would be collected from the criminal, Local’s 300 members at a rate of 2 cents each per month; an accommodation that would only result in an increase of other union members dues in amount of 24 cents per year was de minimis ; unions asserted fear that many more religious objectors would request similar accommodation, resulting in greater cost, was based on mere speculation); EEOC v. Harvard Application Essay Prompt. IBP, Inc. Resistance Wire. , 824 F. Supp. 147 (C.D. Ill. 1993) (adopting EEOC’s interpretation in university essay the Commission Guidelines that undue hardship means, with respect to costs for on the justice a substitute, “costs similar to the regular payment of premium wages,” and holding that “[i]nfrequent payment of harvard university application, premium wages made on white essay a temporary basis and administrative costs associated with implementing an accommodation are considered de minimis , although the ultimate determination is made with ‘due regard given to university essay the identifiable cost in relation to the size and operating cost of the employer.’ 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1)).” [151] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1); Redmond , 574 F.2d at 904 (employer could not demonstrate that paying replacement worker premium wages would cause undue hardship because plaintiff would have been paid premium wages for the hours at issue). [152] Protos , 797 F.2d at 134-35; Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 655 (allowing employee to assign secretary to type his Bible study notes posed more than de minimis cost because secretary would otherwise have been performing employer’s work during that time). [153] “[A]n employer need not accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs if doing so would result in discrimination against white essay, his co-workers or deprive them of contractual or other statutory rights.” Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir.

2004) (also holding that employee’s proposed accommodation of either allowing him to post religiously motivated messages intended to demean and harass co-workers, or the company deleting sexual orientation from its voluntarily adopted diversity and non-discrimination policy, would have posed an undue hardship on the employer); EEOC v. BJ Servs. Harvard University. Co. Essay Prompts For High School. , 921 F. Supp. 1509 (N.D. Tex. 1995) (employer was unable to accommodate employee’s religious request for certain day off because no other employees were available to harvard application essay prompt work, there were safety concerns regarding untrained substitute personnel, there were significant costs in bringing employees from other locations, and usc emba essays, this accommodation would deny other employees their day off); Virts v. Consol. Freightways Corp. of Delaware , 285 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2002) (trucking firm had no obligation under Title VII to accommodate a driver’s religious request for only male driving partners, where making assignments in this manner would have violated collective bargaining agreement). [154] BJ Servs. Co., 921 F. University Essay. Supp. at 1509; Balint v. Carson City, Nevada , 180 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Bhatia v. Physics. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. , 734 F.2d 1382, 1384 (9th Cir.1984) (cost of plaintiff’s requested accommodation was more than de minimis when it required co-workers to assume plaintiff’s share of the hazardous work)); Bruff 244 F.3d at offshore oil drilling, 501 (requiring co-workers of university essay prompt, plaintiff mental health counselor to prompts school seniors assume disproportionate workload to accommodate plaintiff’s request not to counsel certain clients on religious grounds would constitute undue hardship). [155] See, e.g., Sutton v. Providence St.

Joseph Med. Ctr. , 192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. Prompt. 1999) (employer not required to essays about business accommodate job applicant’s religiously based refusal to provide his social security number where employer sought it to comply with Internal Revenue Service and Immigration and Naturalization Service requirements). However, an employer should not assume that it would pose an undue hardship to harvard university prompt accommodate a religious practice that appears to conflict with a generally applicable safety requirement, but rather should assess whether an undue hardship is actually posed. For example, there are existing religious exemptions to the government enforcement procedures of some safety requirements.

See, e.g. , U.S. Essay. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration STD 1-6.5 (“Exemption for Religious Reason from Wearing Hard Hats”) (June 20, 1994) (exempting employers from citations for certain violations based on university application prompt religious objection of employee, but providing for oil drilling essay various reporting requirements). [156] See EEOC v. Oak-Rite Mfg. Corp. , 2001 WL 1168156 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 21, 2001) (manufacturing employee’s proposed accommodation of wearing close-fitting denim or canvas dress or skirt that extends to within two or three inches above the ankle would impose an undue hardship on employer by university application requiring it to experiment with employee safety, given the about, absence of evidence demonstrating safety of proposed accommodation in a comparable work setting); EEOC v. Brink’s Inc., No. 1:02-CV-0111 (C.D. Ill.) (consent decree filed Dec. Essay Prompt. 27, 2002) (settlement of offshore oil drilling essay, case alleging that employee was denied reasonable accommodation when she sought to wear culottes made out of harvard application essay prompt, messenger uniform material, rather than the required trousers, because her Pentecostal Christian beliefs precluded her from wearing pants); c f. Usc Emba Essays. Webb v. City of Philadelphia, 2007 WL 1866763 (E.D.

Pa. June 27, 2007) (undue hardship to university application prompt accommodate the wearing of coursework, a traditional religious headpiece called a khimar by a Muslim police officer while in uniform, where evidence showed dress code in para-military organization promotes cooperation, fosters esprit de corps, emphasizes the hierarchical nature of the police force, and portrays a sense of authority as well as public and religious neutrality to the public). [157] Hardison, 432 U.S. at harvard essay prompt, 80; Stolley v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. , 2007 WL 1010418 (5th Cir. March 28, 2007) (unpublished) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the employer, the court ruled that a newly-hired aircraft assembly line worker was not entitled to have the employer reassign him to a different shift as an usc emba essays accommodation for harvard essay prompt his Sabbath observance, because the employer’s union contract dictated that shift swapping and usc emba essays, transfers would be based on harvard seniority and the union was unwilling to offshore essay waive the contract in this case); see also Balint , 180 F.3d at harvard university prompt, 1054. [158] Balint, 180 F.3d at 1054; Killebrew v. Local Union 1683 of Am. Fed’n of plans, State, County, Mun. Employees, AFL-CIO, 651 F. Supp. 95 (W.D. University Prompt. Ky. 1986) (union not required to negotiate a change in the CBA to allow an employee to sox fatherhood essay bump another employee to obtain an university application prompt accommodation because bumping would have been detrimental to those bumped); see also Virts v. Consol. Freightways Corp. of Delaware , 285 F.3d 508 (6th Cir.

2002) (trucking firm had no obligation under Title VII to accommodate a driver’s religious request for only male driving partners, where making assignments in this manner would have violated CBA); Weber v. Roadway Express, Inc. , 199 F.3d 270 (5th Cir. Essays. 2000) (same); Thomas , 225 F.3d 1149 (because seniority system in CBA gave more senior employees first choice for job assignments, it would be an undue hardship for employer to harvard university application essay grant employee’s accommodation request not to be scheduled to work on Saturdays); Mann v. Essay. Frank , 7 F.3d 1365 (8th Cir.1993) (no violation of the duty to accommodate where the union refused the Postal Service’s request to university essay assign another worker to take plaintiff’s Saturday shift, which would have violated CBA’s provisions governing overtime). [159] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(2); Stolley , 2007 WL 1010418. [160] Lee v. ABF Freight Sys., Inc., 22 F.3d 1019 (10th Cir. 1994) (employer satisfied Title VII obligation when it suggested method by which driver would usually be able to oil drilling work the number of trips each week required under the union contract prior to the Sabbath, and university essay prompt, could use vacation time on other occasions; employer was not required to grant driver’s request to skip assignments, which would then have to be worked by other drivers, or his request to work less than other full-time drivers and gcse physics coursework resistance, reimburse employer for additional costs; or his request to application essay prompt transfer with no loss of seniority, which would violate its CBA, where the employer had sought but could not obtain a waiver from the union). [162] See Wilson v. U.S. West Communications, 58 F.3d 1337 (8th Cir. 1995) (employer reasonably accommodated an employee by asking her when she was outside her cubicle to cover up an anti-abortion button she wore containing a graphic photograph of a fetus because the essay prompts school, button so distracted other employees that it had caused a 40% reduction in productivity and application essay, some employees threatened to walk off their jobs). [163] Opuku-Boateng , 95 F.3d at 1473 (mere complaints by other employees did not constitute undue hardship; employer failed to establish undue hardship in accommodating employee’s religious holidays because it did not show hardship on offshore plaintiff’s co-workers or that accommodation required more than de minimis cost).

[164] Burns, 589 F.2d at 407 (“Undue hardship requires more than proof of harvard university application prompt, some fellow-workers’ grumbling or unhappiness with a particular accommodation to a religious belief. An employer or union would have to essay criminal show . . . actual imposition on co-workers or disruption of the work routine.”); accord Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 655; Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. 2004) (it would have posed an undue hardship for employer to accommodate employee’s religiously motivated posting of large signs in harvard application essay his cubicle which he “intended to be hurtful” and to demean and harass his co-workers; it also would have posed an physics coursework wire undue hardship for harvard university employer to eliminate a portion of its diversity program to which plaintiff had religious objections). [165] See nn.182-184, infra. However, a different result may obtain depending on the setting and the religious garb at essay school, issue. See United States v. New York State Dep’t of university application essay, Corr. Servs. Sox Fatherhood. , Civil Action No. 07-2243 (S.D.N.Y. settlement approved Jan. 18, 2008) (providing for application individualized review of correctional officers’ accommodation requests with respect to uniform and grooming requirements, and allowing employees to wear religious skullcaps such as kufis or yarmulkes if close fitting and solid dark blue or black in offshore essay color, provided no undue hardship was posed).

[166] For example, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 930 generally prohibits the possession of knives, including kirpans, with blades longer than 2.5 inches, in federal facilities, unless otherwise authorized. [167] The Commission’s regulations, Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d), set forth suggested methods of accommodating scheduling conflicts, but those methods are not intended to comprise an exhaustive list. Different factual circumstances will require different solutions. State wage and hour laws may provide certain limitations that impact an employer’s potential flexibility. [168] See “Electronics Manufacturer and Islamic Group Settle Muslim Prayer Issue in Georgia Factory,” Daily Labor Report (BNA), No. 230 (Dec. 1, 1999) (ISSN 1522-5968); see also supra n.149; George v. Harvard University Application. Home Depot , 2002 WL 31319124 (5th Cir. Sept. 22, 2002) (unpublished) (excusing employee who served as department “greeter” from working any Sundays would have posed an undue hardship, because she was the essays about, only greeter in the department; the store would have had to harvard do without a Sunday greeter or hire another employee in order to grant the essay, accommodation, both of which would have posed an undue hardship based on the evidence the employer provided regarding the need for the position); Brener , 671 F.2d 141 (requiring hospital to hire a substitute pharmacist for days employee sought not to work due to university application prompt religious observance involved more than a de minimis cost, and operating without him or having the pharmacy director substitute for him would have had an unacceptable adverse impact on functions of the pharmacy). [169] See U.S. About Plans. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority , Case No.

CV 04-07699 JFW (JTLx) (C.D. Cal. consent decree filed Oct. 2005) (lawsuit filed by essay prompt Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and resolved by consent decree prior to ruling by court on merits; the settlement provided that the employer would accept the applications of Sabbath-observant applicants; provide applicants with information about their accommodation rights; permit drivers to swap assignments with other drivers, and when no acceptable assignment is possible either through use of white essay, seniority rights or swaps, permit drivers to harvard university application essay prompt take temporary leaves of absence; and provide information about religious accommodation in marketing literature and in its training programs for supervisors). [170] EEOC v. White. Robert Bosch Corp. Harvard University Prompt. , 2006 WL 406296 (6th Cir.

Feb. 21, 2006) (unpublished) (in case involving request for sox fatherhood shift swap and relief from mandatory overtime to accommodate Sabbath observance, summary judgment for harvard university application employer reversed where reasonable factfinder could conclude that employer failed to provide reasonable accommodation based on evidence that plaintiff was told a shift swap would not be permitted and the employer’s policy was only designed to identify employees willing to work additional shifts, not to swap shifts); Beadle v. Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Dep’t , 29 F.3d 589 (11th Cir. 1994) (employer satisfied its accommodation obligation by allowing employee to justice make announcement on bulletin board and at employee meeting to seek out co-workers willing to swap); McGuire v. Gen. Motors Corp ., 956 F.2d 607 (6th Cir. 1992) (summary judgment for harvard prompt employer reversed where genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether employer’s accommodation of about business, allowing voluntary shift swaps was a reasonable accommodation where there was evidence employer may have intentionally or unintentionally inhibited volunteers from swapping shifts by university essay issuing a survey to employees regarding whether they would be willing to swap shifts in usc emba essays order to accommodate plaintiff); see also Beadle v. Tampa, 42 F.3d at university essay prompt, 636-37 (excusing police recruit from rotating training schedule would have posed undue hardship because it would undermine intended educational benefit of essays about, working with different training officers); Morrissette-Brown v. Mobile Infirmary Med. Ctr. , 2006 WL 1999133 (S.D. Ala. July 14, 2006) (in case brought by Seventh-day Adventist who requested not to harvard university work on her Sabbath, employer satisfied its accommodation obligation by maintaining a neutral shift rotation schedule, allowing plaintiff to arrange a shift swap with co-workers, and making available the schedules of other employees). [171] See, e.g., Pyro Mining Co. , 827 F.2d at essays business plans, 1088-89 (it would be a reasonable accommodation for university application prompt employer simply to be amenable to a shift swap; employer not required itself actively to solicit other employees to make such a swap unless plaintiff had religious constraints against arranging his own schedule swap with other employees; a CBA’s provision permitting religious observers to trade days off with other employees did not provide reasonable accommodation in prompts for high the case of an employee who had a religious objection to seeking such a trade); EEOC v. Texas Hydraulics, Inc. , Case No. 2:06-cv-161 (E.D. Tenn.

April 16, 2008) (employer's proposal that employee find another qualified candidate to take his Saturday shift was not a reasonable accommodation because the university prompt, employer was on notice that the employee considers it a sin for anyone to work on oil drilling essay Saturday, not just himself); EEOC v. Harvard Application Essay. Aldi , 2008 WL 859249 (W.D. Pa. March 28, 2008) (where an essays business plans employee sincerely believes that working on [his Sabbath] is morally wrong and harvard university, that it is a sin to try to induce another to work in his stead, then an employer's attempt at offshore oil drilling essay, accommodation that requires the employee to seek his own replacement is not reasonable ”) (emphasis in original) (citing Pyro Mining Co. University Essay Prompt. , 827 F.2d at 1088). [172] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. On The. § 1605.2(e)(1); Redmond. , 574 F.2d at 904 (employer could not demonstrate that paying replacement worker premium wages would cause undue hardship because plaintiff would have been paid premium wages for the hours at issue); EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Tel. University Essay Prompt. LP, 2007 WL 2891379 (E.D. Ark. Physics Coursework Resistance Wire. Oct. 3, 2007) (payment of university essay, premium wages for one day to allow two employees to attend a yearly Jehovah’s Witness convention as part of their religious practice, at an alleged cost of criminal justice, $220.72 per person in a facility that routinely paid overtime was not an undue hardship as a matter of law, where there was no evidence that customer service needs actually went unmet on harvard university the day at criminal, issue), appeal docketed , Case No.

08-1096 (8th Cir. filed Jan. 10, 2008). [173] U.S.F. Logistics (IMC), Inc. , 274 F.3d at 477 (“[i]n many cases, a company must modify its stated policies in practice to reasonably accommodate a religious practice”) (citing Minkus v. Metro. Sanitary Dist. , 600 F.2d 80 (7th Cir.1979) (municipal employer failed to accommodate a Jewish applicant when it followed its stated policy and scheduled civil service examinations only on Saturdays). [174] EEOC v. Harvard Essay Prompt. Razzoo’s , Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1781-L (N.D. Tex. consent decree filed June 18, 2007) (settlement of case alleging that restaurant unlawfully failed to accommodate server’s religious beliefs by excusing her from participating in usc emba essays singing “Happy Birthday” to celebrating customers). [175] Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network, Inc. Harvard. , 2007 WL 1302118 (7th Cir. May 2, 2007) (unpublished) (pharmacy reasonably accommodated employee by allowing him to transfer to co-worker any customer service involving contraceptives; employee’s proposed further accommodation of assigning responsibility for essay prompts for high school all initial customer contact to lower-paid technicians, even if it could be done, would impose an undue hardship because it would divert technicians from their assigned data input and insurance verification duties, resulting in uncompleted data work).

The reasonable accommodation that the employer was able to provide in Noesen might pose an undue hardship in a different case where there was no qualified co-worker on duty to whom such customer service duties could be transferred, or where it would otherwise pose more than a de minimis burden on university application prompt the operation of the essay on the criminal, employer’s business. [177] Draper , 527 F.2d at harvard university application essay prompt, 519-20 (transfer that involved substantial reduction in essay pay and would have “wasted [plaintiff’s] skills” would not be reasonable accommodation where plaintiff could have been accommodated in application his original position without undue hardship). [178] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d)(iii) (“When an employee cannot be accommodated either as to his or her entire job or an assignment within the job, employers and labor organizations should consider whether or not it is possible to change the job assignment or give the employee a lateral transfer.”); Rivera v. Choice Courier , 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (employer’s failure to consider transferring employee to position with less stringent dress code so that he could continue his religious practice of proselytizing by wearing patch stating “Jesus is Lord” may have violated Title VII). [179] See supra n.138; Rodriguez , 156 F.3d at 775-77 (permitting employee to exercise transfer rights under CBA to obtain equivalent position that eliminated religious conflict with duty assignment was a reasonable accommodation); see also Cook v. Lindsay Olive Growers , 911 F.2d 233, 241 (9th Cir. 1990) (under state law parallel to resistance wire Title VII, transfer of employee to a lower-level position was reasonable where no equivalent position was available); Bruff , 244 F.3d at 501 (accommodation by transfer to lower-paying non-counselor job could satisfy Title VII if plaintiff could not be accommodated in her current position or an essay equivalent position). [180] Shelton , 223 F.3d at physics coursework wire, 227 (offering transfer to nurse who had religious objection to abortion procedure sometimes performed in harvard essay prompt her department was a reasonable accommodation); EEOC v. Gcse Coursework. Dresser-Rand Co. , 2006 WL 1994792 (W.D.N.Y. Essay Prompt. July 14, 2006) (summary judgment for employer denied in gcse physics coursework wire case on university essay prompt behalf of a Jehovah’s Witness who allegedly was denied transfer to different assignment as an accommodation of his religious objection to working on military projects). But cf. supra n.138 (discussing when a lateral transfer might be an adverse employment action). At least one court has ruled that it is unreasonable for public protectors such as police officers or fire fighters to seek to be relieved from essays about business certain assignments as a religious accommodation.

See Endres v. Indiana State Police , 349 F.3d 922, 927 (7th Cir. 2003) (state police officer’s religious accommodation request not to be assigned to application essay prompt full-time, permanent work at a casino was unreasonable; police and fire departments “need the cooperation of all members” and need them to perform their duties “without favoritism”), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 989 (2004). Because public protectors, such as police officers and firefighters, are obliged to offshore essay serve and protect all under their care, and harvard university, their public responsibilities must take precedence over about business plans, their religious and other personal scruples, in some cases conflicts between the requirements of their job and their religious beliefs may not be able to harvard essay prompt be resolved. However, it is not per se unreasonable for public protectors to obtain changes in essay on the justice job assignments, schedule changes, or transfers in situations where a conflict between their job duties and their religious beliefs could be eliminated or reduced.

Therefore, the better approach is to determine on a case-by-case basis whether granting the request would pose an undue hardship. [181] See, e.g., EEOC v. United Parcel Serv. , 94 F.3d 314 (7th Cir. 1996) (genuine issue of application essay prompt, material fact regarding whether the employer reasonably accommodated the employee’s religious practice of wearing a beard precluded summary judgment for the employer); EEOC v. Gcse. Comair, Inc. , Civil Action No. 1:05-cv-0601 (W.D. Mich. consent decree filed Nov. 22, 2006) (settlement prior to ruling on merits of case on behalf of Rastafarian airline applicant alleging he was not hired because he refused to application prompt cut his hair to conform with the company’s grooming standards); EEOC v. Pilot Travel Ctrs .LLC , Civil Action No. 2:03-0106 (M.D. Tenn. consent decree filed April 9, 2004) (settlement prior to ruling on essay merits of claim on behalf of Messianic Christian maintenance worker, who wore beard as part of application essay, his religious practice, and offshore, was terminated for refusing to shave in compliance with employer’s no-beard policy). [182] United Parcel Serv ., 94 F.3d at 318-20; c ompare Daniels , 246 F.3d 500 (police department may be able to demonstrate that allowing an officer to wear a cross on his uniform would give the appearance of harvard university prompt, public agency endorsement of the officer’s religious views, in violation of the prompts seniors, department’s constitutional obligations, and essay prompt, therefore would pose an undue hardship under Title VII), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 951 (2001), with Draper v. Logan County Pub.

Library , 403 F. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D. Ky. 2005) (public library employee’s First Amendment free speech and free exercise rights were violated when she was prohibited from wearing a necklace with a cross ornament). [183] See, e.g., Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp. , 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir.

2004) (holding that it would pose “an undue hardship to sox fatherhood essay require Costco to grant an exemption because it would adversely affect the employer’s public image,” given Costco’s determination that facial piercings detract from the “neat, clean and professional image” that it aims to university essay prompt cultivate). [184] Denying the employer’s motion for summary judgment in EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. , 2005 WL 2090677 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 29, 2005), the usc emba essays, court ruled that notwithstanding the employer’s purported reliance on a company profile and customer study suggesting that it seeks to present a family-oriented and kid-friendly image, the company failed to demonstrate that allowing an employee to essay have visible religious tattoos was inconsistent with these goals. “Hypothetical hardships based on unproven assumptions typically fail to constitute undue hardship . . . . Red Robin must provide evidence of ‘actual imposition on co-workers or disruption of the white sox fatherhood, work routine’ to demonstrate undue hardship.” S ee also Brown v. University Application Prompt. F.L. Roberts , 419 F. Usc Emba Essays. Supp. 2d 7, 17 (D. Mass. University Application Essay. 2006) (district court held no Title VII violation occurred when employer transferred lube technician whose Rastafarian religious beliefs prohibited him from shaving or cutting his hair to a location with limited customer contact because he could not comply with a new grooming policy; stating it was bound to follow Cloutier as the law of the coursework resistance, circuit, the application, court nevertheless observed in dicta: “If Cloutier’s language approving employer prerogatives regarding ‘public image’ is read broadly, the implications for usc emba essays persons asserting claims for religious discrimination in the workplace may be grave. One has to wonder how often an employer will be inclined to cite this expansive language to terminate or restrict from customer contact, on image grounds, an employee wearing a yarmulke, a veil, or the mark on application prompt the forehead that denotes Ash Wednesday for business many Catholics. More likely, and more ominously, considerations of ‘public image’ might persuade an employer to tolerate the religious practices of predominant groups, while arguing ‘undue hardship’ and harvard university essay, ‘image’ in forbidding practices that are less widespread or well known.”); EEOC v. Usc Emba Essays. Chriskoll, Inc. , d/b/a Brookhaven Burger King, Civil Action No.

06-cv-1197 (E.D. Pa. consent decree filed December 3, 2007) (settlement of claim on behalf of Muslim employee who was terminated pursuant to restaurant appearance code requiring male employees to be clean-shaven notwithstanding that employer’s written policy had exception permitting beards required for religious reasons). [185] See generally EEOC v. American Airlines , Civil Action No. 02-C-6172 (N.D. Ill.) (Order of Resolution filed September 3, 2002) (resolving claim on behalf of employee who was not hired as passenger service agent because she wore a hijab for religious reasons in violation of the airline’s since-changed uniform policy; the airline’s current uniform policy specifically contemplates exceptions for religious accommodation of employees). [186] Webb v. University Application Prompt. City of seniors, Philadelphia, 2007 WL 1866763 (E.D.

Pa. Harvard University Application. June 27, 2007) (granting summary judgment to the employer, the court ruled that the essay criminal justice, City of harvard, Philadelphia established as a matter of physics wire, law that it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate the harvard prompt, wearing of a traditional religious headpiece called a khimar by usc emba essays a Muslim police officer while in uniform, in contravention of the department’s dress code directive). [187] See U.S. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. v. New York State Dep’t of criminal, Corr. Servs. University Application Prompt. , Civil Action No. 07-2243 (S.D.N.Y. On The Justice. settlement approved Jan. 18, 2008) (settlement of case brought on behalf of Muslim correctional officers by U.S. Department of Justice providing that employee requests for harvard university application religious exemptions from uniform and grooming requirements of state prison system would be determined on a case-by-case basis, and essays business, allowing employees to wear religious skullcaps such as kufis or yarmulkes if close fitting and solid dark blue or black in color, provided no undue hardship was posed). [188] See also Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11, at § 1.c (“Accommodation of Religious Exercise”), example (d) (under the First Amendment, government workplaces that allow employees to use facilities for non-work related secular activities generally are required to harvard application essay allow the privilege on equal terms for essay prompts school seniors employee religious activities). [189] See, e.g., Minkus , 600 F.2d 80; Cary , 908 F. Supp. at 1343-44 (employee failed to give employer proper notice so that it could attempt an accommodation of his religious objection to signing consent form for a drug test). [190] Minkus , 600 F.2d 80 (employer must demonstrate it would pose undue hardship to harvard essay prompt allow applicant to take exam at different time than others as a religious accommodation). [191] Sutton v. Providence St.

Joseph Med. Ctr. , 192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 1999) (hospital not liable for refusing to hire applicant who declined to provide social security number on white sox fatherhood religious grounds; because federal tax law required the hospital to obtain all employees’ social security numbers, accommodation of harvard application essay, applicant’s religious belief would pose undue hardship); Hover v. Florida Power Light Co., 1995 WL 91531 (S.D. Fla. Feb.

6, 1995) (employee’s proposed accommodation that employer “make up” a social security number rather than obtain employee’s actual social security number posed an undue hardship), aff’d , 101 F.3d 708 (11th Cir. 1996) (Table) (unpublished). [192] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d)(2); Tooley , 648 F.2d at 1242-44 (union cannot force an employer, under a contractual union security clause, to terminate three Seventh-day Adventists who offered to pay an amount equivalent to dues to a nonreligious charity because the union failed to show that such an accommodation would deprive it of funds needed for its maintenance and operation); EEOC v. White Sox Fatherhood. Univ. of application prompt, Detroit , 904 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990) (because employee’s religious objection was to union itself, reasonable accommodation required allowing him to make charitable donation equivalent to amount of union dues instead of paying dues); Int’l Assoc. of Machinists v. Boeing , 833 F.2d 165, 169 (9th Cir. 1987) (an employer may be required to accommodate an essay employee who has a sincerely held religious opposition to unionism by allowing an equivalent contribution to prompt a mutually agreeable charity in lieu of dues payment); Burns , 589 F.2d at 406-07 (allowing equivalent charitable contribution in lieu of dues did not constitute undue hardship notwithstanding administrative cost to union and “grumblings” by other employees); Cooper v. Gcse Coursework. General Dynamics, 533 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1976) (religious belief that supporting labor union violated precept of “love thy neighbor,” i.e., including employers, was subject to reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship); Reed v. UAW , 523 F. Supp. 2d 592 (E.D. Mich.

Oct. 19, 2007) (union was not liable for denial of reasonable accommodation to employee who objected to paying union dues for university application essay religious reasons, because union satisfied its accommodation obligation under Title VII by coursework wire requiring the employee to pay to a charity of his choice an amount equal to university application full union dues). [193] See McDaniel v. Essex Int’l, Inc. , 696 F.2d 34 (6th Cir. 1982) (finding employee’s proposal to essays about business donate amount equivalent to dues to a “mutually agreeable” charity was a reasonable accommodation that would not have posed an undue hardship) and harvard university prompt, EEOC v. Am. Physics Resistance Wire. Fed’n of university, State, County Mun. Employees , 937 F. Supp. Prompts Seniors. 166, 168 (N.D.N.Y.

1996) (referring to “mutually agreeable” charity as reasonable accommodation). Prompt. Some CBAs have charities listed in them, pursuant to the requirements of section 19 of the National Labor Relations Act. See 20 U.S.C. § 169. [194] Commission Guidelines, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e); Nottelson v. Offshore Oil Drilling Essay. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806 , 643 F.2d 445 (7th Cir. 1981) (charity-substitute religious accommodation for union dues did not pose undue hardship to union where loss of plaintiff’s dues represented only .02% of union’s annual budget, and the union presented no evidence that the loss of receipts from plaintiff would necessitate an increase in the dues of his co?workers); see also Burns , 589 F.2d at 407 (excusing employee from paying his monthly $19 union dues did not pose an university essay prompt undue hardship, where one union officer testified that the physics coursework resistance, loss “wouldn’t affect us at essay prompt, all” and union’s asserted fear of many religious objectors was based on mere speculation; the court noted, however, that if “in the about business plans, future, the expressed fear of widespread refusal to pay union dues on religious grounds should become a reality, undue hardship could be proved”). One court has held that it may be inappropriate to essay prompt require the religious objector to white sox fatherhood essay pay the full amount of the union dues to a charitable organization, however, if non-religious objectors are permitted to pay a reduced amount. See O’Brien v. Springfield Educ. Ass’n , 319 F. Supp. 2d 90 (D. Mass.

2003) (not a reasonable accommodation to require religious objector to application essay prompt pay full union dues where state statute permitted non-union members to white sox fatherhood pay a lower amount in application essay form of agency fee). Cf. Madsen v. Offshore Essay. Associated Chino Teachers, 317 F. Supp. 2d 1175, 1179 (C.D. Harvard University Essay. Cal. Offshore Essay. 2004) (holding that it was not disparate treatment under Title VII to harvard application essay prompt require religious objectors to essay seniors pay full amount of dues to harvard university essay prompt charity where non-religious objectors were only paying agency fee to union). [195] See EEOC v. Univ. of Detroit , 904 F.2d at 335; see also U.S. Justice. v. Ohio and EEOC v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association , Case No. 2:05-CV-799 (S.D.

Ohio consent decree filed Sept. Harvard University Application. 2006) (lawsuits filed by prompts school Civil Rights Division of U.S. Department of Justice and EEOC against harvard essay prompt, Ohio state agencies and their employee union, respectively, over their refusal to accommodate state employees’ religious objections to payment of union dues unless the offshore oil drilling essay, employees were members of churches that have “historically held conscientious objections to joining or financially supporting” unions; pursuant to settlement reached prior to application essay ruling by court on merits, the for high, consent decree provides that a state employee is permitted to harvard university application pay an amount equal to the union service fee to a mutually agreeable charity if he has sincerely held religious objections to supporting the union, even if he does not belong to such a church); Int’l Assoc. of Machinists , 833 F.2d 165, 169 (9th Cir. 1987) (explaining that because “Title VII defines religion as ‘all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief,’” a union may be required to accommodate an employee who has a sincerely held religious opposition to unionism by allowing equivalent contribution to mutually agreeable charity in lieu of dues payment, even if he “is not a member of an organized religious group that opposes unions”). [196] Wilson, 58 F.3d at 1341-42 (given disruption among co-workers actually caused in usc emba essays workplace, employee’s request to wear at essay, all times a button containing a graphic photograph of a fetus with anti-abortion message posed undue hardship; employer reasonably accommodated employee by offering her several alternatives, including to take the button off or cover up the photograph portion when she left her work cubicle); cf . Red Robin Gourmet Burgers , 2005 WL 2090677 (denying employer’s motion for white sox fatherhood essay summary judgment because issue of whether employee’s Kemetic religious wrist tattoos would disrupt work or otherwise pose an undue hardship raised a disputed factual question to university be decided by jury). [197] Wilson, 58 F.3d at 1341-42 (employer denied certain accommodation options because of demonstrated disruption to essays business plans co-workers); Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 656-57 (there was insufficient evidence to establish that supervisor’s occasional prayers in harvard university application prompt meetings posed an undue hardship because, although the employer asserted that the supervisor’s conduct had polarized employees along religious lines, it adduced no supporting evidence).

[198] EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [199] U.S.F. Logistics (IMC) , 274 F.3d at 476 (employer reasonably accommodated plaintiff’s religious practice of sporadically using the phrase “Have a Blessed Day” when it permitted her to use the essays about business, phrase with co-workers and supervisors who did not object, but prohibited her from using the phrase with customers where at least one regular client objected; allowing her to harvard university application essay use the phrase with customers who objected would have posed an essays about business undue hardship); Banks v. Application Essay Prompt. Serv. Am. Corp. , 952 F. Supp. 703 (D. Kan. 1996) (plaintiff food service employees at company cafeteria, who were terminated when they refused to stop greeting customers with phrases such as “God Bless You” and “Praise the Lord,” presented a triable issue of usc emba essays, fact regarding whether they could have been accommodated without undue hardship; in harvard application the absence of employer proof that permitting the statements was disruptive or that it had any legitimate reason to fear losing business, a reasonable jury could conclude that no undue hardship was posed; the employer received only 20 to 25 complaints while serving approximately 130,000 to 195,000 customers, which is a complaint rate of between .01025 and .01923%; and the employer produced no evidence of decreased use of the cafeteria or religious polarization among customers).

[200] See infra nn.201-203; see also Johnson v. Halls Merch. , 1989 WL 23201 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 17, 1989) (court found it would have posed undue hardship on employer to permit retail employee’s regular statement to customers “in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth,” because it offended the beliefs of some customers and therefore cost the company business). [201] See Knight , 275 F.3d at 164-65 (allowing employee to evangelize clients would cause undue hardship). Essay Prompts For High School. Compare Baz v. Walters , 782 F.2d 701 (7th Cir. Harvard University Application Essay Prompt. 1986) (government hospital did not violate employee chaplain’s Title VII religious accommodation or First Amendment Free Exercise rights by terminating him for usc emba essays evangelizing patients; it would have posed an undue hardship under Title VII, and would have violated the First Amendment Establishment Clause, to permit chaplain to remain employed given his intention to harvard prompt minister to patients), with Rivera v. Choice Courier Sys., Inc., 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether courier was denied reasonable accommodation where employer could have accommodated courier’s need to evangelize by transferring him to essays about a position with a less stringent dress code that would have allowed employee to continue wearing a patch stating “Jesus is Lord”). [202] Moreover, a private employer’s own rights under the First Amendment Free Speech Clause may provide a defense to harvard university prompt a Title VII accommodation claim, if the proposed accommodation would require the offshore oil drilling, private employer involuntarily to university prompt display a religious message that could be construed as its own.

See also infra § IV-C-7. Usc Emba Essays. Similarly, if XYZ were a government employer, the First Amendment Establishment Clause would likely justify its refusal to display a religious message. Harvard University Application Essay. However, Susan’s display probably would not violate the essay, Establishment Clause, or pose an university essay prompt undue hardship for Title VII purposes, because it has a minimal effect on any co-workers who saw it, whereas Roger’s display might be perceived to constitute government endorsement of a particular religion and gcse physics wire, pose an Establishment Clause violation. See Berry v. Dep’t of Social Servs. , 447 F.3d 642 (9th Cir. 2006) (accommodating social worker’s request to application prompt display religious items in his cubicle and to discuss religion with clients would have posed an undue hardship under Title VII on usc emba essays county social services department since the accommodations sought would create a danger of the application essay, employer violating the Establishment Clause); cf. Peloza v. Capistrano Unified Sch. Dist. , 37 F.3d 517 (9th Cir.

1994) (school district’s restriction on teacher’s First Amendment right of free speech in prohibiting teacher from usc emba essays talking with students about religion during school day was justified by school district’s interest in avoiding Establishment Clause violation); Draper v. Logan County Pub. Library , 403 F. Harvard Essay. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D. Ky. Gcse Physics. 2005) (public library’s decision to bar employee from wearing necklace with cross was not justified by library’s purported interest in avoiding Establishment Clause violation; “[a] different conclusion might be justified, if for example, the library allowed employees to actively proselytize or if it permitted religious banners or slogans to be hung from the rafters”). [203] Knight , 275 F.3d 156; Grant v. Fairview Hosp. Healthcare Serv., 2004 WL 326694 (D. Application. Minn. 2004) (ultrasound technician was offered a reasonable accommodation of about plans, his religious beliefs when hospital excused him from performing ultrasounds on university women contemplating abortions; hospital did not have to allow technician to provide pastoral counseling, as that accommodation would have posed an undue hardship); see also Grossman v. South Shore Pub.

Sch. Gcse Physics Resistance Wire. Dist. , 507 F.3d 1097 (7th Cir. 2007) (affirming summary judgment for school district on terminated guidance counselor’s First Amendment free exercise and Title VII claims, the harvard university essay prompt, court ruled that the school district was permitted to terminate counselor for her conduct, even if her actions of praying with students who approached her for guidance and throwing away school contraceptive education materials were motivated by her religious beliefs; there was insufficient evidence that her termination was based on her religious views alone as opposed to these actions, which the school district was entitled to prohibit). [204] See Townley, 859 F.2d at 619-21 (private employer has First Amendment free exercise right to offshore oil drilling express its religion in the workplace). [205] Young , 509 F.2d 140; see, e.g., EEOC v. Native Angels Homecare Agency , Civil Action No. Harvard Application. 7:06-cv-83 (E.D.N.C. consent decree filed March 22, 2007) (settlement prior to decision by usc emba essays court on the merits of claim alleging that a registered nurse was required to attend a “prayer circle” at work and was then terminated because she objected and refused to attend). [206] Townley, 859 F.2d at 620-21 (employer must accommodate an employee’s atheism; no undue hardship because excusing employee from services would not have cost anything nor caused a disruption; employer’s free exercise rights may be overridden where necessary to avoid religious discrimination in violation of Title VII). [207] Young , 509 F.2d 140 (employee was constructively discharged based on her religion in violation of essay, Title VII where her superior advised her that she had obligation to attend monthly staff meetings in their entirety and advised her that she could simply “close her ears” during religious exercises with which meetings began). [208] Although it is beyond the essay for high, scope of Title VII enforcement, we note for the sake of harvard essay prompt, completeness that the justice, U.S. Supreme Court has held that wreaths and application essay, Christmas trees are “secular” symbols, akin to items such as lights, Santa Claus, and reindeer, and offshore oil drilling essay, thus that government display of these items does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment. See County of Allegheny v. ACLU , 492 U.S.

573 (1989) (stand-alone crèche on university essay county courthouse steps violated establishment clause, but display elsewhere of Christmas tree next to a menorah and a sign proclaiming “liberty” did not); Lynch v. Donnelly , 465 U.S. 668 (1984) (holding that government-sponsored display of crèche did not violate establishment clause because it was surrounded by various secularizing symbols, thus precluding a perception of government endorsement of religion); Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11 at Section D (example (b)). For a discussion of both Title VII and establishment clause claims arising from holiday decorations in essay federal government employment context, see, e.g., Spohn v. Harvard University Essay. West , 2000 WL 1459981 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2000). In the private sector, establishment clause constraints would not apply. As a best practice, however, all employers may find that sensitivity to the diversity of their workplace promotes positive employee relations. [209] An employer may accommodate the employee’s religious belief by substituting an alternative technique or method that does not conflict with the employee’s religious belief or by excusing the employee from that part of the training program that poses a conflict, if doing so would not pose an undue hardship.

[210] Many employers have policies that require employees to treat each other with “courtesy, dignity and respect.” This terminology fits within the ambit of “professionally” as used in for high the example. See also Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. Harvard University. 2004) (it would have constituted undue hardship for employer to accommodate employee by eliminating portions of essay, its diversity program to which employee raised religious objections; to do so would have “infringed upon the company’s right to promote diversity and encourage tolerance and good will among its workforce”). If training conflicts with an employee’s religious beliefs, the content of the training materials may be determinative in deciding whether it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate an harvard university application essay employee by excusing him from the training or a portion thereof. If the training required or encouraged employees to value certain lifestyles or dimensions of oil drilling essay, diversity, it might be more difficult for an employer to establish that it would pose an harvard university application essay prompt undue hardship to for high seniors accommodate an employee who objects to participating on religious grounds. Buonanno v. ATT Broadband, LLC, 313 F. Supp.

2d 1069 (D. Harvard University Essay Prompt. Colo. 2004) (company can require and instruct employees to treat co-workers with respect in accordance with corporate diversity policy, but violation of Title VII occurred where company did not accommodate employee’s refusal on religious grounds to for high school sign diversity policy asking him to “value” homosexual co-workers, which he reasonably believed required him to subscribe to a certain belief system rather than simply agree to treat his co-workers appropriately). [211] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2. [212] EEOC v. Harvard University Application Prompt. WCM Enter., Inc. , 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir.

2007) (evidence was sufficient for employee to proceed to trial on claim that he was subjected to hostile work environment harassment based on both religion and national origin where harassment motivated both by on the his being a practicing Muslim and by having been born in application essay India); Vitug v. Multistate Tax Comm’n , 88 F.3d 506, 515 (7th Cir. 1996) (Catholic Filipino employee made out a prima facie case of offshore essay, national origin and essay, religious discrimination, although he did not prevail on the merits).